I do understand and NONE of those rationalizations are feeble. They
are all pointed and dealt with every day in real life...

It is entirely the Womans' choice until those that would deny that
right/choice step forward with a real solution and there is but ONE.
That is real life.

On Jan 13, 1:22 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
> That you pretend not to understand and offer feeble rationalizations
> makes you sound even worse.
>
> On Jan 13, 2:18 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It does or does not fit the definition ???  Why yes it does.
>
> > 1 : a person who exploits the hospitality of the rich and earns
> > welcome by flattery
> > 2 : an organism living in, with, or on another organism in parasitism
> > 3 : something that resembles a biological parasite in dependence on
> > something else for existence or support without making a useful or
> > adequate return.
>
> > It is just that until the person in whose womb it resides says otherwise.
>
> > On 1/13/09, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Referring to an unborn child as a parasite makes you look
> > > intentionally inflamatory and incredibly childish.
>
> > > On Jan 13, 1:58 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > We already assume responsibility for those that are not able to make
> > > > their own decisions, legally, mentally. as to euthanasia... it is
> > > > allowed in many countries as long as the person requesting it is found
> > > > CAPABLE of doing so. we already PERSONALLY fund whatever just
> > > > punishment is upheld by the courts or voted into law. This varies
> > > > state to state. we uphold the family right to pull the plug to AVOID
> > > > further costs on the extremely incapacitated.
>
> > > > This is NO different.  We must allow the vessel to expel unwanted
> > > > cargo. The person to be rid of the parasite. The responsible and able
> > > > to communicate party that is INVOLVED to make the decision.
>
> > > > If you remove ANY one of these rights YOU (pl) must be willing to pay
> > > > the consequences.
>
> > > > On 1/13/09, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > TAO,
>
> > > > > By this logic; must we assume responsibility for the elderly on life
> > > > > support in order to argue against euthanasia?  Must we take home or
> > > > > personally fund the incarceration of a convicted murderer in order to
> > > > > oppose capital punishment?
>
> > > > > On Jan 13, 12:03 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Quakko, how many have YOU adopted to support your position ??
>
> > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:00 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > when will your blood lust be satisfied murky?  when there are 50
> > > > > > > million bodies tossed in dumpsters?  60, 70, 100 million?  nazi.
>
> > > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:31 am, "florida mike  !" <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Thank god ! we still have doctors like this one who are willing 
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > treat women despite the Nazi like attacks by the right wing of 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > GOP
>
> > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:25 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > While Kansas doctor George Tiller is still fighting 
> > > > > > > > > accusations of
> > > > > > > > > illegally aborting 19 viable babies, an undercover sting 
> > > > > > > > > operation
> > > > > > > > > conducted by a pro-life organization revealed his clinic 
> > > > > > > > > intentionally
> > > > > > > > > underestimating fetal age and viability to dodge state laws.
>
> > > > > > > > > According to a sworn statement, a pregnant mother calling 
> > > > > > > > > herself
> > > > > > > > > "Shaye" received a sonogram from Tiller's clinic determining 
> > > > > > > > > her baby
> > > > > > > > > was beyond the allowed legal age of abortion, but the test's
> > > > > > > > > administrator "threw it into a trashcan" and recalculated a 
> > > > > > > > > lesser
> > > > > > > > > gestational age. The clinic scheduled Shaye for an abortion 
> > > > > > > > > four days
> > > > > > > > > later.
>
> > > > > > > > > Shaye, working undercover with the pro-life organization 
> > > > > > > > > Operation
> > > > > > > > > Rescue, later that day received two additional sonograms from 
> > > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > medical centers, both showing the baby beyond the legal 
> > > > > > > > > abortion age.
> > > > > > > > > Further, even at the age recalculated by Tiller's clinic, the 
> > > > > > > > > abortion
> > > > > > > > > four days later would have still been beyond the age of 
> > > > > > > > > viability.
>
> > > > > > > > > "This evidence warrants further investigation by law 
> > > > > > > > > enforcement
> > > > > > > > > authorities," said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman in a
> > > > > > > > > statement on ChristianNewsWire. "This is convincing proof 
> > > > > > > > > that, in
> > > > > > > > > spite of already facing 19 criminal charges, Tiller continues 
> > > > > > > > > to flout
> > > > > > > > > the law to the danger of women and their babies."
>
> > > > > > > > > As WND reported, Tiller, whose abortion work was featured in 
> > > > > > > > > a recent
> > > > > > > > > profile by WND columnist Jack Cashill, faces accusations for 
> > > > > > > > > aborting
> > > > > > > > > viable babies without obtaining the legally required, 
> > > > > > > > > independent
> > > > > > > > > second opinion affirming the medical necessity for late-term
> > > > > > > > > abortions.
>
> > > > > > > > >http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85944-Hidequot...-
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
> > > > Mark M. Kahle
> > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- 
> > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Mark M. Kahle
> > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- Hide 
> > quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to