Why do you post on the same thread with different names? On Jan 13, 2:57 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > We are one and the same. > > On Jan 13, 1:52 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > That post you just responded to was to THE ANNOINTED ONE. > > > On Jan 13, 2:41 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Late term abortion and an attempted sting to prove a doctor was > > > performing them illegally ?? > > > > No. I didn't get that. But I did address it.... > > > > If you do not obey the law expect to go to jail. > > > > remember that ?? > > > > On 1/13/09, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Read back throught the thread and understand what we're talking about > > > > before you jump in. > > > > > On Jan 13, 2:31 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I do understand and NONE of those rationalizations are feeble. They > > > > > are all pointed and dealt with every day in real life... > > > > > > It is entirely the Womans' choice until those that would deny that > > > > > right/choice step forward with a real solution and there is but ONE. > > > > > That is real life. > > > > > > On Jan 13, 1:22 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > That you pretend not to understand and offer feeble rationalizations > > > > > > makes you sound even worse. > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 2:18 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > It does or does not fit the definition ??? Why yes it does. > > > > > > > > 1 : a person who exploits the hospitality of the rich and earns > > > > > > > welcome by flattery > > > > > > > 2 : an organism living in, with, or on another organism in > > > > > > > parasitism > > > > > > > 3 : something that resembles a biological parasite in dependence > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > something else for existence or support without making a useful or > > > > > > > adequate return. > > > > > > > > It is just that until the person in whose womb it resides says > > > > > > > otherwise. > > > > > > > > On 1/13/09, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Referring to an unborn child as a parasite makes you look > > > > > > > > intentionally inflamatory and incredibly childish. > > > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 1:58 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > We already assume responsibility for those that are not able > > > > > > > > > to make > > > > > > > > > their own decisions, legally, mentally. as to euthanasia... > > > > > > > > > it is > > > > > > > > > allowed in many countries as long as the person requesting it > > > > > > > > > is found > > > > > > > > > CAPABLE of doing so. we already PERSONALLY fund whatever just > > > > > > > > > punishment is upheld by the courts or voted into law. This > > > > > > > > > varies > > > > > > > > > state to state. we uphold the family right to pull the plug > > > > > > > > > to AVOID > > > > > > > > > further costs on the extremely incapacitated. > > > > > > > > > > This is NO different. We must allow the vessel to expel > > > > > > > > > unwanted > > > > > > > > > cargo. The person to be rid of the parasite. The responsible > > > > > > > > > and able > > > > > > > > > to communicate party that is INVOLVED to make the decision. > > > > > > > > > > If you remove ANY one of these rights YOU (pl) must be > > > > > > > > > willing to pay > > > > > > > > > the consequences. > > > > > > > > > > On 1/13/09, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > TAO, > > > > > > > > > > > By this logic; must we assume responsibility for the > > > > > > > > > > elderly on life > > > > > > > > > > support in order to argue against euthanasia? Must we take > > > > > > > > > > home or > > > > > > > > > > personally fund the incarceration of a convicted murderer > > > > > > > > > > in order to > > > > > > > > > > oppose capital punishment? > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 12:03 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Quakko, how many have YOU adopted to support your > > > > > > > > > > > position ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:00 am, Ohio mark > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > when will your blood lust be satisfied murky? when > > > > > > > > > > > > there are 50 > > > > > > > > > > > > million bodies tossed in dumpsters? 60, 70, 100 > > > > > > > > > > > > million? nazi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:31 am, "florida mike !" > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank god ! we still have doctors like this one who > > > > > > > > > > > > > are willing to > > > > > > > > > > > > > treat women despite the Nazi like attacks by the > > > > > > > > > > > > > right wing of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > GOP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 6:25 am, Ohio mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While Kansas doctor George Tiller is still fighting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accusations of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > illegally aborting 19 viable babies, an undercover > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sting operation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > conducted by a pro-life organization revealed his > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clinic intentionally > > > > > > > > > > > > > > underestimating fetal age and viability to dodge > > > > > > > > > > > > > > state laws. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > According to a sworn statement, a pregnant mother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > calling herself > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Shaye" received a sonogram from Tiller's clinic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > determining her baby > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was beyond the allowed legal age of abortion, but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the test's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > administrator "threw it into a trashcan" and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recalculated a lesser > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gestational age. The clinic scheduled Shaye for an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > abortion four days > > > > > > > > > > > > > > later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Shaye, working undercover with the pro-life > > > > > > > > > > > > > > organization Operation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rescue, later that day received two additional > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sonograms from other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > medical centers, both showing the baby beyond the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > legal abortion age. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Further, even at the age recalculated by Tiller's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clinic, the abortion > > > > > > > > > > > > > > four days later would have still been beyond the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > age of viability. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "This evidence warrants further investigation by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > law enforcement > > > > > > > > > > > > > > authorities," said Operation Rescue President Troy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Newman in a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > statement on ChristianNewsWire. "This is convincing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > proof that, in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spite of already facing 19 criminal charges, Tiller > > > > > > > > > > > > > > continues to flout > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the law to the danger of women and their babies." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As WND reported, Tiller, whose abortion work was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > featured in a recent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > profile by WND columnist Jack Cashill, faces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accusations for aborting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > viable babies without obtaining the legally > > > > > > > > > > > > > > required, independent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > second opinion affirming the medical necessity for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > late-term > > > > > > > > > > > > > > abortions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85944-Hidequot... > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle > > > > > > > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the > > > > > > > > > difference.... Me- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle > > > > > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... > > > > > > > Me- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > -- > > > Mark M. Kahle > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- > > > Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
