Yeah, I noted the WH agreed to the expense.. that was Bush, who never
said no to an expense and that's exactly what pisses me off.

I'm not trying to attack Pelosi here. I'm saying this is a needless
expense. Government is way too quick to spend my/our money for
bullshit expenses. If it was THEIR money they would probably find
another way.

I'm not aware of whether Pelosi is using the old plane or not, but if
she is I would imagine it's only because the new one isn't ready yet.
My argument is with the request and the approval, and no one raising
an objection along the way. Whether she's actually using the new plane
or not is moot.

> And I was a critic of her asking for something larger.
> These planes are about as nice as they come!

So we agree then!

On Jan 28, 3:38 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2:37 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Studio,
>
> > I agree that Pelosi is not the first Speaker to get their own jet, but
> > there is still debate over the justification and sanity of upgrading
> > to a 757 class aircraft, all because the existing Lear class aircraft
> > can’t make CA without stopping for refueling. The issues I have with
> > this are;...
>
> As far as I'm aware, Pelosi is still using the original Gulfstream
> (not Lear or Boeing 757) she was assigned by the
> Sergeant At Arms of the House.
>
> That said; The White House also agreed with her request for a larger
> plane.
> Read about it here.
>
> http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp
>
> A picture of her plane was posted by me here in the Files section.
> ro939ck (50)
> And I was a critic of her asking for something larger.
> These planes are about as nice as they come!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to