getting it in the ass is what they like.  and like it or not this is
still a majority rules country.  and if the majority says this is the
way it is, then so be it.  if we did what the fool libs want and cater
to everyones individual wants, we would have nothing but chaos.

On Feb 1, 9:26 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> Travis,
>
> Tell me if I have this arguement correct.
>
> One group of citizens/people that claim to hold the constitution "sacred"
> are allowed a certain priveledge/right and they do not want another group of
> citizens that same priveledge/right.
>
> The group of citizens that is being denied this equality of priveledge/right
> is boycotting and or legally harrassing the people and businesses of those
> people that donated money to enforce this denial of priveledge/right.
>
> Now the people that favored/supported the denial are trying to call "foul"
> because they are being held accountable for their own beliefs/actions by the
> group they sought to deny the rights to.
>
> If I've got this correct, then I agree with you.
>
> but could we change it to rock salt ??
>
> On 2/1/09, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Maybe a few of them will get a load of buckshot in their asses.
>
> > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Ohio mark 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> let us sit back and see what happens to these people when their names
> >> are disclosed.  the limp wristers are foaming at the mouth to get at
> >> them.  or maybe that isn't foam.
>
> >> On Feb 1, 6:28 am, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > fine with me !
>
> >> > On Feb 1, 6:21 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > And while I am at it, all doners to all non-profit and not-for-profit
> >> should
> >> > > be public.  And that includes all religious donations too.
>
> >> > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > Keep it simple.  All doners of any amount to all political causes,
> >> pacs,
> >> > > > campaigns, etc should be public.
>
> >> > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:03 AM, swamp fox <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > > >> this thread is about the bigots in Cal trying to stay hidden under
> >> > > >> cover not the Americans who donated to obama . do try to keep up
> >> > > >> streak !
>
> >> > > >> On Jan 31, 10:15 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > >> > So should Obama be required to publicly disclose all HIS
> >> donors???
> >> > > >> > Something his refused to do...   Guess Mickey Mouse and Donald
> >> Duck
> >> > > >> > are haPPY AS THEIR STATUS CAN BE REMAIN HIDDEN...
>
> >> > > >> > On Jan 31, 7:07 am, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > >> > > Prop. 8 Campaign Can't Hide Donors' Nameshttp://
> >> > > >>www.truthout.org/013009O
> >> > > >> > > Bob Egelko, The San Francisco Chronicle: "Proposition 8
> >> proponents'
> >> > > >> > > complaint that a California campaign-finance disclosure law has
> >> led
> >> > > >> > > to
> >> > > >> > > harassment of same-sex marriage opponents failed today to sway
> >> a
> >> > > >> > > federal judge, who refused to throw out the law or shield
> >> donors'
> >> > > >> > > names. Lawyers for Protect Marriage, sponsor of the
> >> constitutional
> >> > > >> > > amendment that won voter approval Nov. 4, said contributors
> >> have
> >> > > >> > > already faced consumer boycotts, picketing and even death
> >> threats
> >> > > >> > > after the state posted their names and other information in
> >> mandatory
> >> > > >> > > campaign reports."- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > *~@):~{>
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Mark M. Kahlewww.filacoffee.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to