Travis, Tell me if I have this arguement correct.
One group of citizens/people that claim to hold the constitution "sacred" are allowed a certain priveledge/right and they do not want another group of citizens that same priveledge/right. The group of citizens that is being denied this equality of priveledge/right is boycotting and or legally harrassing the people and businesses of those people that donated money to enforce this denial of priveledge/right. Now the people that favored/supported the denial are trying to call "foul" because they are being held accountable for their own beliefs/actions by the group they sought to deny the rights to. If I've got this correct, then I agree with you. but could we change it to rock salt ?? On 2/1/09, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe a few of them will get a load of buckshot in their asses. > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Ohio mark <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> let us sit back and see what happens to these people when their names >> are disclosed. the limp wristers are foaming at the mouth to get at >> them. or maybe that isn't foam. >> >> On Feb 1, 6:28 am, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote: >> > fine with me ! >> > >> > On Feb 1, 6:21 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > And while I am at it, all doners to all non-profit and not-for-profit >> should >> > > be public. And that includes all religious donations too. >> > >> > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Keep it simple. All doners of any amount to all political causes, >> pacs, >> > > > campaigns, etc should be public. >> > >> > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:03 AM, swamp fox <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > >> this thread is about the bigots in Cal trying to stay hidden under >> > > >> cover not the Americans who donated to obama . do try to keep up >> > > >> streak ! >> > >> > > >> On Jan 31, 10:15 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > So should Obama be required to publicly disclose all HIS >> donors??? >> > > >> > Something his refused to do... Guess Mickey Mouse and Donald >> Duck >> > > >> > are haPPY AS THEIR STATUS CAN BE REMAIN HIDDEN... >> > >> > > >> > On Jan 31, 7:07 am, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Prop. 8 Campaign Can't Hide Donors' Nameshttp:// >> > > >>www.truthout.org/013009O >> > > >> > > Bob Egelko, The San Francisco Chronicle: "Proposition 8 >> proponents' >> > > >> > > complaint that a California campaign-finance disclosure law has >> led >> > > >> > > to >> > > >> > > harassment of same-sex marriage opponents failed today to sway >> a >> > > >> > > federal judge, who refused to throw out the law or shield >> donors' >> > > >> > > names. Lawyers for Protect Marriage, sponsor of the >> constitutional >> > > >> > > amendment that won voter approval Nov. 4, said contributors >> have >> > > >> > > already faced consumer boycotts, picketing and even death >> threats >> > > >> > > after the state posted their names and other information in >> mandatory >> > > >> > > campaign reports."- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > >> > - Show quoted text - >> > >> > > > -- >> > > > *~@):~{> >> > >> > > -- >> > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> >> >> > -- Mark M. Kahle www.filacoffee.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
