The fact that an Electoral College exists disproves your arguement... next try please.
Furthermore you have not addressed any point I made... please, do try to disprove any one of them with fact. On Feb 1, 10:23 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote: > if it is not a majority nation, then what do you call one person, one > vote. majority rules. oh wait, that's right, that only last long > enough for the libs to find an activist liberal judge to over rule the > majority's will. > > On Feb 1, 11:00 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ohio mark, > > > I think that that is your problem.... The US is NOT a majority rule nation. > > It never was. Where did you get that idea ?? > > > It is a REPUBLIC which is a RULE of LAW nation that has a constitution. Yes > > those local rules are placed at the behest of the "majority" but are > > subservient to and MUST comply with the constitution which requires a > > "super" majority to change (even that must be done by "constitutional" > > methods). > > > Until you cancel all equal protection and equal opportunity sections of the > > constitution itself that guarantees that all rights and priveledges are > > granted to all people on US soil EQUALLY you will just have to let them have > > it "up the ass" from their spouses or friends. > > > To NOT allow any citizen his/her equal rights and protections is indeed to > > spit on and or wipe your ass with that hallowed document. > > > You seem to want to do just that. > > > On 2/1/09, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > getting it in the ass is what they like. and like it or not this is > > > still a majority rules country. and if the majority says this is the > > > way it is, then so be it. if we did what the fool libs want and cater > > > to everyones individual wants, we would have nothing but chaos. > > > > On Feb 1, 9:26 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Travis, > > > > > Tell me if I have this arguement correct. > > > > > One group of citizens/people that claim to hold the constitution > > > > "sacred" > > > > are allowed a certain priveledge/right and they do not want another > > > > group > > > of > > > > citizens that same priveledge/right. > > > > > The group of citizens that is being denied this equality of > > > priveledge/right > > > > is boycotting and or legally harrassing the people and businesses of > > > those > > > > people that donated money to enforce this denial of priveledge/right. > > > > > Now the people that favored/supported the denial are trying to call > > > "foul" > > > > because they are being held accountable for their own beliefs/actions by > > > the > > > > group they sought to deny the rights to. > > > > > If I've got this correct, then I agree with you. > > > > > but could we change it to rock salt ?? > > > > > On 2/1/09, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Maybe a few of them will get a load of buckshot in their asses. > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Ohio mark <[email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > >> let us sit back and see what happens to these people when their names > > > > >> are disclosed. the limp wristers are foaming at the mouth to get at > > > > >> them. or maybe that isn't foam. > > > > > >> On Feb 1, 6:28 am, swamp fox <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > fine with me ! > > > > > >> > On Feb 1, 6:21 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > And while I am at it, all doners to all non-profit and > > > not-for-profit > > > > >> should > > > > >> > > be public. And that includes all religious donations too. > > > > > >> > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Travis <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > Keep it simple. All doners of any amount to all political > > > causes, > > > > >> pacs, > > > > >> > > > campaigns, etc should be public. > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:03 AM, swamp fox < > > > [email protected]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> this thread is about the bigots in Cal trying to stay hidden > > > under > > > > >> > > >> cover not the Americans who donated to obama . do try to keep > > > up > > > > >> > > >> streak ! > > > > > >> > > >> On Jan 31, 10:15 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > >> > So should Obama be required to publicly disclose all HIS > > > > >> donors??? > > > > >> > > >> > Something his refused to do... Guess Mickey Mouse and > > > Donald > > > > >> Duck > > > > >> > > >> > are haPPY AS THEIR STATUS CAN BE REMAIN HIDDEN... > > > > > >> > > >> > On Jan 31, 7:07 am, swamp fox <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > Prop. 8 Campaign Can't Hide Donors' Nameshttp:// > > > > >> > > >>www.truthout.org/013009O > > > > >> > > >> > > Bob Egelko, The San Francisco Chronicle: "Proposition 8 > > > > >> proponents' > > > > >> > > >> > > complaint that a California campaign-finance disclosure > > > > >> > > >> > > law > > > has > > > > >> led > > > > >> > > >> > > to > > > > >> > > >> > > harassment of same-sex marriage opponents failed today to > > > sway > > > > >> a > > > > >> > > >> > > federal judge, who refused to throw out the law or shield > > > > >> donors' > > > > >> > > >> > > names. Lawyers for Protect Marriage, sponsor of the > > > > >> constitutional > > > > >> > > >> > > amendment that won voter approval Nov. 4, said > > > > >> > > >> > > contributors > > > > >> have > > > > >> > > >> > > already faced consumer boycotts, picketing and even death > > > > >> threats > > > > >> > > >> > > after the state posted their names and other information > > > > >> > > >> > > in > > > > >> mandatory > > > > >> > > >> > > campaign reports."- Hide quoted text - > > > > > >> > > >> > - Show quoted text - > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > > >> > > > *~@):~{> > > > > > >> > > -- > > > > >> > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text - > > > > > >> > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > > > > Mark M. Kahlewww.filacoffee.com > > > -- > > Mark M. Kahlewww.filacoffee.com- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
