what is dishonest is your claim of double voting ! this article you
posted as proof is pure bull shit as certified by the election board
and the courts who backed them up .
now either you have real proof or you do not which is it ?
On Feb 3, 12:41 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> If in a hill stop digging is the rule for most...  You hire a steam
> shovel to KEEP digging
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123111967642552909.html
>
> >>> Under Minnesota law, election officials are required to make a duplicate 
> >>> ballot if the original is damaged during Election Night counting. 
> >>> Officials are supposed to mark these as "duplicate" and segregate the 
> >>> original ballots. But it appears some officials may have failed to mark 
> >>> ballots as duplicates, which are now being counted in addition to the 
> >>> originals. This helps explain why more than 25 precincts now have more 
> >>> ballots than voters who signed in to vote. By some estimates this double 
> >>> counting has yielded Mr. Franken an additional 80 to 100 votes.
>
> This disenfranchises Minnesotans whose vote counted only once. And one
> Canvassing Board member, State Supreme Court Justice G. Barry
> Anderson, has acknowledged that "very likely there was a double
> counting." Yet the board insists that it lacks the authority to
> question local officials and it is merely adding the inflated numbers
> to the totals.
>
> You are dishonest IF you claim you kept up with the story and did not
> know about this...  You should not be so strident if you DID NOT keep
> up with the story...    Now READ the article and learn HOW Minnesota
> DID NOT compile with the basic tenets of Gore vs Bush...
>
> On Feb 3, 12:07 pm, "liberal mike532  !" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > lady if YOU had bothered to follow the election you would know that
> > there wasn't any double voting as certified by the election
> > committee . now if you have proof of your claims other than rumors
> > started by coleman and the fox channel please post them
>
> > On Feb 3, 9:42 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > If a precinct has 100 voters and they have 122 ballots which the
> > > Democrats insist on counting, there are 22 voters who voter twice...
> > > And that is what has happened in Minnesota...   If you had followed
> > > the recount closely, YOW WOULD HAVE KNOWN THIS...   But instead you
> > > call others names because pesky facts insist you extreme partisan
> > > positions are taken for party loyality rather than truth or honest
> > > debate...
>
> > > On Feb 3, 4:58 am, "liberal mike532  !" <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > sunshine you are full of shit post the proof that minnesota allowed
> > > > double voting !
>
> > > > On Feb 2, 9:12 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > You demand perfection from your opponents and excuse imperfection in
> > > > > your friends -- typical...  But for one who POV was willing to
> > > > > PERFECTLY willing to allow Saddam and family to remain in power, you
> > > > > claim democracy in Iraqi isn't because of glitches in voting...   FYI,
> > > > > it is NOT that glitches exist, but how the system handles them...  In
> > > > > Minnesota they allowed double voting, which I think is wrong...  Have
> > > > > a problem???  Ask why the Democrats in Minnestoa allow double
> > > > > voting...
>
> > > > > On Feb 2, 7:57 am, "liberal mike532  !" <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Calm Iraqi Election Marred as Thousands Were Denied 
> > > > > > Votehttp://www.truthout.org/020109C
> > > > > > Leila Fadel, McClatchy Newspapers: "Iraqis cast ballots in 14 of the
> > > > > > country's 18 provinces Saturday, selecting among 14,500 candidates
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > 440 seats on new provincial councils. The day was free of election-
> > > > > > related violence, but thousands of Iraqis were unable to vote 
> > > > > > because
> > > > > > their names were inexplicably missing from voter lists. Some 
> > > > > > confused
> > > > > > Iraqis even wandered neighborhoods looking for a polling place that
> > > > > > would accept their vote."- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to