AB,

There are reasons for debate. They are obviously lost on you as is the
ability to absorb a written document such as the Geneva Conventions... (yes
there are more than one and all are in effect). Now just exactly what part
of any of my posts do you find in error ??

Since I and Keith have backed our positions with existing law  and
conventions (that which you claim has been broken) and you cite "Blogs" I
wonder which is more accurate ??

As to regurgitation over and over.. yes I keep repeating myself as the law
and or conventions are finite documents much unlike your increasingly
child-like emotional "arguements" that have nothing to do with real life.

The definition of "Fact", by the way, is not "things I would like to
believe", or "things that match my position" or even "things I can twist
to mold my politics", your lord God Bush is gone.


On 2/9/09, AmericanBuilt.us <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 8, 5:31 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Mark!
> >
> > Well said......
>
> do i get this right? mark is losing a debate while HE is the
> MODERATOR....?
>
> and keith thinks that's "well"? is keith your cheerleader, markie?
>
> against people who are wrong 10 times per post. i shouldn't even have
> to debate. it really worries me that there might be people who are
> more naive than you - who'd believe the filthy propaganda you
> regurgeriterate over and over and over and over again. mark should
> just write 'i forfeit' as his sig and stop wasting his precious time
> posting...
> >
>


-- 
Mark M. Kahle,  ,
www.filacoffee.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to