Thats gringo southerner slang shag, not british slang shag. (unfortunately)
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Cold Water <[email protected]> wrote: > *Let me get this straight Keith - you can shag on the dance floor in > South Carolina but you can't have a cigarette afterwards?* > ** > *CW <OH! That is just sooooo wrong ;-)>* > ** > ----- Original Message ----- *From:* Keith In Tampa<[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Monday, March 16, 2009 01:33 > *Subject:* Re: Smoking bans at restaurants are more of a workplace health > issue > > As I shared with Mrs. R several weeks ago, I believe that I am quite > dashing, debonair, ("De Bone Are"??) and just downright graceful on the > dance floor, but only after I have had five beers. Can't be four beers, > can't be six beers; but only five beers. Back when I lived in the > Carolinas, we would go down to Myrtle Beach for their shagging > contests......No one except me and a couple of right healthy women thought > that I was all that good however, except as stated, these couple of rather > healthy gals....I would say something to them like, "Hon, that diet is > working for ya!! You are definitely looking light on your feet out there on > the dance floor tonight! You have really slimmed your vehicle down!! They > voted for me!!! > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Mrs. Rabbit > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> There were sooooo many people packed into this little ocean front bar >> till there was no room for dancing! Like you, after a couple of >> drinks, I could be on Dancing with the stars, otherwise, it's prolly >> best to just stay seated at the bar. ;o) >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mar 16, 12:23 pm, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Morning sweetie! Thankyou for being so conscience of others breathing >> > issues. Sounds like a lovely evening out. Did you kick up t he dance >> > floor too? I love to dance after a couple of drinks. ;-) Not very >> > good at it, but its fun. >> > >> > On Mar 16, 7:48 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Mornin' chick! >> > >> > > Congrats on putting the cigs down! It's HARD as hell, but can be >> > > done! >> > >> > > Believe it or not, but hubby actually took me OUT this weekend. It >> > > was a small bar, with a live band (hubby is good friends with a member >> > > or else we wouldn't have been there) and smoking wasn't allowed on the >> > > inside of the building, only on the outside deck facing the ocean. It >> > > was a nice set up. However, I was concerned before getting there how >> > > smokey it would be once inside. I was pleased to see the smokers >> > > being directed outside due to the smoking ban. Now, as a smoker, I >> > > wouldn't have mind going outside because I know there are people who >> > > have breathing problems including but not limited to asthma. Ever >> > > seen the pic of a fish lying beside a fishbowl full of water? The >> > > caption below is burned in my mind....Asthma is like being a fish out >> > > of water... >> > >> > > On Mar 16, 9:29 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > Morning rigsy. I hate over use of perfums also. I have gotten more >> > > > sensitive to those kinds of sscents over the years. I always wonder >> > > > what they are trying to hide? Bathing and a lite spritz goes a long >> > > > way in smelling acceptable. >> > > > As far as Obama smoking...I think he's a bad example in that. I >> > > > understand the addiction and his right to do it. But there is no >> doubt >> > > > in my mind that some kid is going to see him and emulate him because >> > > > hey...if the president thinks its ok.... just saying.... >> > >> > > > On Mar 16, 6:51 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > The public changed government's mind about Prohibition so the same >> > > > > could happen to smoking- one cannot be sure of anything >> absolutely. >> > > > > Sorry you don't like the smell of tobacco. I do- especially pipes >> or >> > > > > cigars. What I can't stand is getting into an elevator with overly >> > > > > perfumed women. Or wondering how many germs are mutating under >> long >> > > > > painted fingernails. BTW, Obama smokes- what do you think of that? >> > >> > > > > On Mar 16, 7:19 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > I have stated how I feel about the ban on smoking and why. What >> doyou >> > > > > > want? Me to care that you are upset you can't light up nect to >> me >> > > > > > because the law says you can't? That ain't gonna happen. I still >> > > > > > thrilled I don't have to smell you or your tobacco 'scent'. So >> sue me. >> > > > > > Banging your head agaisnt a wall?...... They say insanity is >> doing >> > > > > > something over and over that doesn't have the outcome that you >> want or >> > > > > > expect. That would make you crazy...because nothing you can >> write will >> > > > > > make me change my mind on my happiness that you can't smoke in >> the >> > > > > > same public building I'm in. You lost , get over it and smoke >> yourself >> > > > > > silly in the cold. Or hey...do the smart thing and quit. You'll >> live >> > > > > > longer and so will the victims of your exhaled poisons. But stop >> > > > > > whinning about something that isn't going to change back to the >> old >> > > > > > ways. The public demanded it , as they should. >> > >> > > > > > On Mar 16, 3:10 am, "AmericanBuilt.us" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > On Mar 15, 8:17 pm, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > > > what about restaurant owners in THEIR OWN bars? >> > > > > > > > or business owners in THEIR OWN office buildings? >> > > > > > > > ********************* >> > > > > > > > As I said in my post. Not the same as a private home. The >> restuarants >> > > > > > > > and bars have health codes they have to meet to serve the >> public. >> > > > > > > > Smoking falls well within those health codes to be concerned >> about. >> > > > > > > > The filtration systems weren't adequate enough, and didn't >> protect the >> > > > > > > > workers health either. >> > >> > > > > > > it's like banging my head against a wall... >> > >> > > > > > > is this crap you've invented - or did a POLITICIAN feed it to >> you? >> > >> > > > > > > "compare the typical amount of smoke in a bar with OSHA >> > > > > > > requirements..." >> > >> > > > > > > OSHA = Occupational Safety & Health Administrations >> > >> > > > > > > = WORK HEALTH CODE >> > >> > > > > > > and NOT ALL offices are public, mine wasn't >> > > > > > > &WTF were small businesses REQUIRED to spend (taxable) >> $100,000s on >> > > > > > > smoke eaters right before the ban???? >> > >> > > > > > > Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) >> > >> > > > > > > Because the organic material in tobacco doesn't burn >> completely, >> > > > > > > cigarette smoke contains more than 4,700 chemical compounds. >> Although >> > > > > > > OSHA has no regulation that addresses tobacco smoke as a >> whole, 29 CFR >> > > > > > > 1910.1000 Air contaminants, limits employee exposure to >> several of the >> > > > > > > main chemical components found in tobacco smoke. In normal >> situations, >> > > > > > > exposures would not exceed these permissible exposure limits >> (PELs), >> > > > > > > and, as a matter of prosecutorial discretion, OSHA will not >> apply the >> > > > > > > General Duty Clause to ETS. >> > >> > > > > > > For further information to offer to employers/employees as >> guidance, >> > > > > > > you may wish to review a document published by the U.S. >> Environmental >> > > > > > > Protection Agency (EPA) about the health effects from >> environmental >> > > > > > > tobacco smoke, A Fact Sheet: Respiratory Health Effects of >> Passive >> > > > > > > Smoking. Additional information on indoor air quality in >> general can >> > > > > > > be found on the Indoor Air Quality Technical Links page on the >> OSHA >> > > > > > > website. >> > >> > > > > > > We hope you find this information helpful. If you have any >> questions, >> > > > > > > please feel free to contact the Office of Health Enforcement >> at (202) >> > > > > > > 693-2190 >> > >> > > > > > > now call them and ASK WHY OSHA HAS "NO REGULATION THAT >> ADDRESSES >> > > > > > > TOBACCO" >> > >> > > > > > > ASK FOR A SCIENTIFIC REPORT THAT PROVES SMOKING CAUSES CANCER >> > >> > > > > > > wow...- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> > >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> >> -- Mark M. Kahle, , www.filacoffee.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
