I have stated how I feel about the ban on smoking and why. What doyou want? Me to care that you are upset you can't light up nect to me because the law says you can't? That ain't gonna happen. I still thrilled I don't have to smell you or your tobacco 'scent'. So sue me. Banging your head agaisnt a wall?...... They say insanity is doing something over and over that doesn't have the outcome that you want or expect. That would make you crazy...because nothing you can write will make me change my mind on my happiness that you can't smoke in the same public building I'm in. You lost , get over it and smoke yourself silly in the cold. Or hey...do the smart thing and quit. You'll live longer and so will the victims of your exhaled poisons. But stop whinning about something that isn't going to change back to the old ways. The public demanded it , as they should.
On Mar 16, 3:10 am, "AmericanBuilt.us" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 15, 8:17 pm, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > what about restaurant owners in THEIR OWN bars? > > or business owners in THEIR OWN office buildings? > > ********************* > > As I said in my post. Not the same as a private home. The restuarants > > and bars have health codes they have to meet to serve the public. > > Smoking falls well within those health codes to be concerned about. > > The filtration systems weren't adequate enough, and didn't protect the > > workers health either. > > it's like banging my head against a wall... > > is this crap you've invented - or did a POLITICIAN feed it to you? > > "compare the typical amount of smoke in a bar with OSHA > requirements..." > > OSHA = Occupational Safety & Health Administrations > > = WORK HEALTH CODE > > and NOT ALL offices are public, mine wasn't > &WTF were small businesses REQUIRED to spend (taxable) $100,000s on > smoke eaters right before the ban???? > > Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) > > Because the organic material in tobacco doesn't burn completely, > cigarette smoke contains more than 4,700 chemical compounds. Although > OSHA has no regulation that addresses tobacco smoke as a whole, 29 CFR > 1910.1000 Air contaminants, limits employee exposure to several of the > main chemical components found in tobacco smoke. In normal situations, > exposures would not exceed these permissible exposure limits (PELs), > and, as a matter of prosecutorial discretion, OSHA will not apply the > General Duty Clause to ETS. > > For further information to offer to employers/employees as guidance, > you may wish to review a document published by the U.S. Environmental > Protection Agency (EPA) about the health effects from environmental > tobacco smoke, A Fact Sheet: Respiratory Health Effects of Passive > Smoking. Additional information on indoor air quality in general can > be found on the Indoor Air Quality Technical Links page on the OSHA > website. > > We hope you find this information helpful. If you have any questions, > please feel free to contact the Office of Health Enforcement at (202) > 693-2190 > > now call them and ASK WHY OSHA HAS "NO REGULATION THAT ADDRESSES > TOBACCO" > > ASK FOR A SCIENTIFIC REPORT THAT PROVES SMOKING CAUSES CANCER > > wow... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
