There were sooooo many people packed into this little ocean front bar till there was no room for dancing! Like you, after a couple of drinks, I could be on Dancing with the stars, otherwise, it's prolly best to just stay seated at the bar. ;o)
On Mar 16, 12:23 pm, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > Morning sweetie! Thankyou for being so conscience of others breathing > issues. Sounds like a lovely evening out. Did you kick up t he dance > floor too? I love to dance after a couple of drinks. ;-) Not very > good at it, but its fun. > > On Mar 16, 7:48 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Mornin' chick! > > > Congrats on putting the cigs down! It's HARD as hell, but can be > > done! > > > Believe it or not, but hubby actually took me OUT this weekend. It > > was a small bar, with a live band (hubby is good friends with a member > > or else we wouldn't have been there) and smoking wasn't allowed on the > > inside of the building, only on the outside deck facing the ocean. It > > was a nice set up. However, I was concerned before getting there how > > smokey it would be once inside. I was pleased to see the smokers > > being directed outside due to the smoking ban. Now, as a smoker, I > > wouldn't have mind going outside because I know there are people who > > have breathing problems including but not limited to asthma. Ever > > seen the pic of a fish lying beside a fishbowl full of water? The > > caption below is burned in my mind....Asthma is like being a fish out > > of water... > > > On Mar 16, 9:29 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Morning rigsy. I hate over use of perfums also. I have gotten more > > > sensitive to those kinds of sscents over the years. I always wonder > > > what they are trying to hide? Bathing and a lite spritz goes a long > > > way in smelling acceptable. > > > As far as Obama smoking...I think he's a bad example in that. I > > > understand the addiction and his right to do it. But there is no doubt > > > in my mind that some kid is going to see him and emulate him because > > > hey...if the president thinks its ok.... just saying.... > > > > On Mar 16, 6:51 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The public changed government's mind about Prohibition so the same > > > > could happen to smoking- one cannot be sure of anything absolutely. > > > > Sorry you don't like the smell of tobacco. I do- especially pipes or > > > > cigars. What I can't stand is getting into an elevator with overly > > > > perfumed women. Or wondering how many germs are mutating under long > > > > painted fingernails. BTW, Obama smokes- what do you think of that? > > > > > On Mar 16, 7:19 am, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I have stated how I feel about the ban on smoking and why. What doyou > > > > > want? Me to care that you are upset you can't light up nect to me > > > > > because the law says you can't? That ain't gonna happen. I still > > > > > thrilled I don't have to smell you or your tobacco 'scent'. So sue me. > > > > > Banging your head agaisnt a wall?...... They say insanity is doing > > > > > something over and over that doesn't have the outcome that you want or > > > > > expect. That would make you crazy...because nothing you can write will > > > > > make me change my mind on my happiness that you can't smoke in the > > > > > same public building I'm in. You lost , get over it and smoke yourself > > > > > silly in the cold. Or hey...do the smart thing and quit. You'll live > > > > > longer and so will the victims of your exhaled poisons. But stop > > > > > whinning about something that isn't going to change back to the old > > > > > ways. The public demanded it , as they should. > > > > > > On Mar 16, 3:10 am, "AmericanBuilt.us" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 15, 8:17 pm, NavyBrat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > what about restaurant owners in THEIR OWN bars? > > > > > > > or business owners in THEIR OWN office buildings? > > > > > > > ********************* > > > > > > > As I said in my post. Not the same as a private home. The > > > > > > > restuarants > > > > > > > and bars have health codes they have to meet to serve the public. > > > > > > > Smoking falls well within those health codes to be concerned > > > > > > > about. > > > > > > > The filtration systems weren't adequate enough, and didn't > > > > > > > protect the > > > > > > > workers health either. > > > > > > > it's like banging my head against a wall... > > > > > > > is this crap you've invented - or did a POLITICIAN feed it to you? > > > > > > > "compare the typical amount of smoke in a bar with OSHA > > > > > > requirements..." > > > > > > > OSHA = Occupational Safety & Health Administrations > > > > > > > = WORK HEALTH CODE > > > > > > > and NOT ALL offices are public, mine wasn't > > > > > > &WTF were small businesses REQUIRED to spend (taxable) $100,000s on > > > > > > smoke eaters right before the ban???? > > > > > > > Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) > > > > > > > Because the organic material in tobacco doesn't burn completely, > > > > > > cigarette smoke contains more than 4,700 chemical compounds. > > > > > > Although > > > > > > OSHA has no regulation that addresses tobacco smoke as a whole, 29 > > > > > > CFR > > > > > > 1910.1000 Air contaminants, limits employee exposure to several of > > > > > > the > > > > > > main chemical components found in tobacco smoke. In normal > > > > > > situations, > > > > > > exposures would not exceed these permissible exposure limits (PELs), > > > > > > and, as a matter of prosecutorial discretion, OSHA will not apply > > > > > > the > > > > > > General Duty Clause to ETS. > > > > > > > For further information to offer to employers/employees as guidance, > > > > > > you may wish to review a document published by the U.S. > > > > > > Environmental > > > > > > Protection Agency (EPA) about the health effects from environmental > > > > > > tobacco smoke, A Fact Sheet: Respiratory Health Effects of Passive > > > > > > Smoking. Additional information on indoor air quality in general can > > > > > > be found on the Indoor Air Quality Technical Links page on the OSHA > > > > > > website. > > > > > > > We hope you find this information helpful. If you have any > > > > > > questions, > > > > > > please feel free to contact the Office of Health Enforcement at > > > > > > (202) > > > > > > 693-2190 > > > > > > > now call them and ASK WHY OSHA HAS "NO REGULATION THAT ADDRESSES > > > > > > TOBACCO" > > > > > > > ASK FOR A SCIENTIFIC REPORT THAT PROVES SMOKING CAUSES CANCER > > > > > > > wow...- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
