How about Iraq's oil paying for the war? That didn't happen either.
Russia commands a strategic position via the Caspian Oil Basin- but so
does Iran and other bordering countries. The big problem is transport
through peaceful countries.

On May 13, 4:20�pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
> jgg,
>
> Yep, read a history book. Most wars have bben fought over one natural
> resource or another.
> We should have gotten deadly serious about alternatives to fossil
> fuels 35 years ago. But nooooooo that would have required a bit of
> sacrifice and actually looking and planning ahead. Can't be havin'
> THAT!
>
> On May 13, 3:15�pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > and the Democrats refused to consider the reality of the threat in the
> > calculus in the debate on removing Saddam. � Well folks -- Russia now
> > is suggesting just that... �So to the LW who either ignored that
> > reasoning OR who claimed Iraq was only about AMERICAN oil supplies,
> > consider my logic prescient...
>
> >http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/05/2009513141243951766....
>
> > Russia has warned that military conflicts over energy resources could
> > erupt along its borders in the near future, as the race to secure oil
> > and gas reserves gains momentum.
>
> > A Kremlin policy paper, which maps out Russia's main challenges to
> > national security for the next decade, said "problems that involve the
> > use of military force cannot be excluded" in competition for
> > resources.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to