rigs, Perhaps you would be better served by reading what I actually say and not responding based on what you think I "really meant".
On May 14, 3:46 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for telling me that- and am glad you made it through. Pardon > my ignorance especially when I compare those six years. Too bad the > text/typing can't blush- it would be now. > > On May 13, 10:20 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > rigs, > > > Never said war was funny. I said the lie that "the war won't cost the > > American tax-payer practically anything, Iraqi oil will pay for it." > > That was what is funny. > > > i was a Marine Corps rifleman 1968-1974, I'm well aware war is not > > fuuny. > > > On May 13, 6:59 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Oh yes they were. Tell that to 4000+ graves The gravely wounded. ! > > > 00,000 more+ numbers unknown. Nothing is funny about war, Hollywood. > > > > On May 13, 6:30 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > rigs, > > > > > Yeah, that was really funny. But i don't think anyone was really dumb > > > > enough to believe that anyway. > > > > > On May 13, 4:38 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > How about Iraq's oil paying for the war? That didn't happen either. > > > > > Russia commands a strategic position via the Caspian Oil Basin- but so > > > > > does Iran and other bordering countries. The big problem is transport > > > > > through peaceful countries. > > > > > > On May 13, 4:20 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > jgg, > > > > > > > Yep, read a history book. Most wars have bben fought over one > > > > > > natural > > > > > > resource or another. > > > > > > We should have gotten deadly serious about alternatives to fossil > > > > > > fuels 35 years ago. But nooooooo that would have required a bit of > > > > > > sacrifice and actually looking and planning ahead. Can't be havin' > > > > > > THAT! > > > > > > > On May 13, 3:15 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > and the Democrats refused to consider the reality of the threat > > > > > > > in the > > > > > > > calculus in the debate on removing Saddam. Well folks -- Russia > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > is suggesting just that... So to the LW who either ignored that > > > > > > > reasoning OR who claimed Iraq was only about AMERICAN oil > > > > > > > supplies, > > > > > > > consider my logic prescient... > > > > > > > >http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/05/2009513141243951766.... > > > > > > > > Russia has warned that military conflicts over energy resources > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > erupt along its borders in the near future, as the race to secure > > > > > > > oil > > > > > > > and gas reserves gains momentum. > > > > > > > > A Kremlin policy paper, which maps out Russia's main challenges to > > > > > > > national security for the next decade, said "problems that > > > > > > > involve the > > > > > > > use of military force cannot be excluded" in competition for > > > > > > > resources.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
