Thank you for telling me that- and am glad you made it through. Pardon
my ignorance especially when I compare those six years. Too bad the
text/typing can't blush- it would be now.

On May 13, 10:20�pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
> rigs,
>
> Never said war was funny. I said the lie that "the war won't cost the
> American tax-payer practically anything, Iraqi oil will pay for it."
> That was what is funny.
>
> i was a Marine Corps rifleman 1968-1974, I'm well aware war is not
> fuuny.
>
> On May 13, 6:59�pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Oh yes they were. Tell that to 4000+ graves The gravely wounded. !
> > 00,000 more+ numbers unknown. Nothing is funny about war, Hollywood.
>
> > On May 13, 6:30 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > rigs,
>
> > > Yeah, that was really funny. But i don't think anyone was really dumb
> > > enough to believe that anyway.
>
> > > On May 13, 4:38 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > How about Iraq's oil paying for the war? That didn't happen either.
> > > > Russia commands a strategic position via the Caspian Oil Basin- but so
> > > > does Iran and other bordering countries. The big problem is transport
> > > > through peaceful countries.
>
> > > > On May 13, 4:20 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > jgg,
>
> > > > > Yep, read a history book. Most wars have bben fought over one natural
> > > > > resource or another.
> > > > > We should have gotten deadly serious about alternatives to fossil
> > > > > fuels 35 years ago. But nooooooo that would have required a bit of
> > > > > sacrifice and actually looking and planning ahead. Can't be havin'
> > > > > THAT!
>
> > > > > On May 13, 3:15 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > and the Democrats refused to consider the reality of the threat in 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > calculus in the debate on removing Saddam. Well folks -- Russia now
> > > > > > is suggesting just that... So to the LW who either ignored that
> > > > > > reasoning OR who claimed Iraq was only about AMERICAN oil supplies,
> > > > > > consider my logic prescient...
>
> > > > > >http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/05/2009513141243951766....
>
> > > > > > Russia has warned that military conflicts over energy resources 
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > erupt along its borders in the near future, as the race to secure 
> > > > > > oil
> > > > > > and gas reserves gains momentum.
>
> > > > > > A Kremlin policy paper, which maps out Russia's main challenges to
> > > > > > national security for the next decade, said "problems that involve 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > use of military force cannot be excluded" in competition for
> > > > > > resources.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to