KIT, Oh hell Keith, be a man and punch him with your fist. :-)
On May 15, 8:10 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > I would love to literally, open palm bitch slap that guy!! > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Cold Water <[email protected]> wrote: > > I love Ann!!! At the risk of (once again) being un-PC - does anyone > > question the wisdom of having a flamboyant, in-your-face gay male like Perez > > Hilton as a judge of the Miss USA pageant? > > > CW > > ----- Original Message ----- *From:* Keith In > > Tampa<[email protected]> > > *To:* politicalforum <[email protected]> ; > > Coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia > > © <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Thursday, May 14, 2009 10:38 > > *Subject:* Coulter: Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California > > > *Liberal Taliban Issues Fatwa Against Miss California* by Ann Coulter > > Posted 05/13/2009 ET > > Updated 05/13/2009 ET > > >http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=31863 > > > Not even Dick Cheney can incite the blood-curdling rage of liberals at the > > sight of a sexy Evangelical Christian. Paula Jones, Katherine Harris, > > Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and, most recently, Miss California, Carrie > > Prejean, have all come under a frenzy of attacks from liberals. > > > Christians are supposed to be fat, balding sweaty little men with bad > > complexions. It's liberals who are supposed to be the sexy ones. (I know > > that from watching "The West Wing" and all movies starring Julia Roberts.) > > > But sadly for liberals, in real life, the fat, balding sweaty little guy > > with the bad complexion is Perez Hilton and the smoking-hot babe is Carrie > > Prejean. > > > This apparent contradiction incites violent anger in liberals, triggering > > their famous "flight or flight" response. So liberal masturbators are, once > > again, launching furious attacks on a beautiful Christian in a fit of pique > > similar to the one directed at Joan of Arc. > > > First, the Miss USA contest held a press conference to announce that > > Prejean had breast implants. Take a Christian position in public and Satan's > > handmaidens will turn all your secrets into front-page news. > > > Next, a photographer released a single cheesecake photo of Prejean. This > > prompted liberal reporters who have never met a Christian to proclaim that > > Christians were outraged by the photo. Liberals believe abortion is a > > sacrament, but smoking, wearing short skirts and modeling lingerie are > > mortal sins. (And if wearing women's underwear is a basis for being > > disqualified from the pageant, that's the end of Perez Hilton's judging > > career.) > > > Then on Monday some genuine "semi-nude" photos were released. These were > > not what we'd call appropriate for a Christian. In a curiously similar > > attack, the left's final attempt to destroy Paula Jones was to lure her into > > appearing naked in Penthouse magazine. Oh well. > > > Christians aren't people who believe they are without sin; they're people > > who know they're sinners and are awestruck by God's grace in sending his > > only Son to take the punishment they deserve. > > > This is in contradistinction to liberals, all of whom believe they're on a > > fast track to heaven on the basis of being "basically good" people -- and > > also believe that anyone who disagrees with that theological view is evil. > > > Finally (so far, anyway), reporters gleefully released the divorce records > > of Prejean's parents. Because when you want the truth, what is more reliable > > than angry accusations traded in the middle of an acrimonious divorce? > > > Liberals used the divorce papers to argue that Prejean had some deep-seated > > psychological disturbance causing her to oppose gay marriage. Symptoms of > > this debilitating illness include a belief in some sort of "god" and a > > reverence for the Bible. > > > It's not as if Prejean's special talent in the Miss USA contest was to > > perform an opposite-sex marriage. (Or, as the president and I call it, > > "marriage.") She didn't even volunteer her "controversial" views on > > marriage. Rather, she was asked for her opinion on gay marriage and gave it > > -- in an answer wrapped in so many layers of sugar it took 10 minutes to get > > to the point. > > > "Well, I think it's great that Americans are able to choose one way or the > > other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite > > marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that > > marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out > > there. But that's how I was raised, and I believe that it should be between > > a man and a woman." > > > What a vicious hate-monger! Any second there I was expecting her to bust > > out a "by golly!" or an "oh my gosh!" Angry gay-marriage supporters should > > be happy they didn't get my version of that answer. It contains some terms > > you won't find in your Bible. > > > Liberals wouldn't attack James Dobson with the amount of bile they've > > directed at a 21-year-old beauty contestant. It's not just Christianity -- > > it's women liberals hate. > > > From Jean-Paul Sartre, Pablo Picasso and Bertrand Russell, who treated > > women -- mostly their mistresses -- like dogs, to Teddy Kennedy and Bill > > Clinton in our own day, liberals are ferocious misogynists. They share > > Muslims' opinion of women, differing only to the extent that liberals also > > support a women's right to have an abortion and to perform lap dances. > > > You'd be better off in a real burqa than under the authority of a liberal > > American male. > > > I'm not sure we needed a psychological profile of Prejean to figure out why > > she holds the same position on gay marriage as: the president, the vice > > president, the secretary of state, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards > > and his mistress, and the vast majority of the American people. > > > But what is crying out for an explanation is why every bubble-head TV news > > anchorette from a nice, churchgoing red state ends up adopting the political > > views of Karl Marx. > > > From Katie Couric on CBS to Norah O'Donnell on MSNBC, the whole stable of > > TV anchorettes weirdly have the exact same politics as their liberal > > masters. It's the ideological burqa women are required to wear to work in > > the mainstream media. As with a conventional burqa, it enforces conformity > > and severely restricts the vision. > > > The only way to protect yourself is to do the liberal male's bidding, as > > the bubble-head anchorettes do, or stand on the rock of Christianity. > > > Now, another beautiful Christian has thrown off the liberal burqa, thereby > > inciting mass hysteria throughout the liberal establishment. Prejean doesn't > > care. She is blazing across the sky, as impotent nose-pickers jockey for a > > piece of her reflected light by hurling insults at her.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
