>From one of the 631 footnotes, please point out the unreliable parts of the footnote.....
321 See DIC Table: Unknown 1 (died in November 2002 in Afghanistan “Salt Pit” prison of hypothermia after being chained to the floor and left without blankets; official cause of death not released); Naseer (allegedly tortured to death by Army Special Forces soldiers in Mar. 2003; official investigation findings not released); al-Sumaidae (unarmed 21-year-old student allegedly killed in cold blood in June 2005 by Marine during a search of his home; case referred to Navy criminal investigators 10 days after death); Dababa (June 2003 autopsy indicates body covered by bruises and at least 50 abrasions, with head and neck suffering the most significant abuses, resulting in hemorrhaging throughout his brain; official cause of death not announced); Kenami (death after detainee subjected to extreme exercise, cuffed, hooded and left in overcrowded cell; cause officially undetermined); al-Izmerly (chief of forensics at Baghdad Hospital found January 2004 death was due to “massive blow” to head; investigation pending); Unknown 15 (U.S. forces allege male shot during home raid while reaching for a pistol; family alleges he was a physically disabled old man and reportedly provides medical records indicating a spinal condition or degeneration; no criminal investigation or any other action appears to have been initiated); Nasef Ibrahim (military ruled death due to natural causes; son, with him at the time, filed lawsuit alleging death from abuse); Khan (military initially stated death due to heart attack, until press reports of snakebite; family alleges abuse; no medical or other investigation records released since death in September 2004); A. Najem (military ruled death from natural causes after hunger strike, but no medical records or interviews in support); Zaid (U.S.-conducted autopsy stated accidental death from heat stroke; army official stated possibility that Zaid was not given enough water or proper care). Human Rights First asked the Department of Defense on January 20 and 26, 2006 the status of the investigations and any prosecutions in the following cases for which, as of February 10, we had received no response: Naseer; al-Sumaidae; Dababa; Kenami [sought comment on medical expert finding that death caused by suffocation]; al-Izmerly; Ibrahim; Khan; Zaid. On May 15, 9:17 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > As stated, (I think here, but possibly in Euwetopia) your claim that 98 > prisoners have been killed while in custody by the United States is > unsubstantiated claims made by the Socialist Workers Party, and a group > called, "Human Rights First", neither of which are considered credible, and > the claim is denied by the Pentagon. > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:42 AM, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Explain the 98 prisoners who died during 'questioning'? > > > If Bush REALLY had kept America safe 3000 Americans would > > not have died on 9/11. > > > On May 14, 10:10 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sugarshack, Sugarshack, Sugarshack, > > > > There was no torture. Yesterday's Hearing pretty much established that > > > fact. > > > > Get over it. Be thankful to the Bush Administration for keeping your > > > bitching, griping, socialist ass alive!! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
