frankg, Then all he had to do at some point wa say "I was ONLY talking about The Socialist Workers Party of great Britain and NOT the Democratic party".
On May 15, 10:46 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hollywood, > > Where did Keith tie the claim of 98 killed prisoners to the Democratic > Party? He attributed the claim to the Socialist Workers Party and > Human Rights First. You somehow morphed that into the National > Democratic Party. > > On May 15, 11:29 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > KIT, > > > You know damned good and well it does not. > > Please tell me what position the ladies you mention hold in the > > Democratic Party, or for that matter the Socialist Workers Party of > > Britain. > > > Or did you mean to imply that any individual whom either you, or > > themselves, identify as a Demcoratic is automatically a spokesperson > > for the party? You DO understand that people can make staements as an > > individual and that does not necessarily reflect a position of the > > Party itself. > > I am a registered Democrat. If i say "the fuckin' Cubs suck" are you > > immediately going to bleat "The Democratic Party HATES baseball"? > > C'mon man, apply a little simple common sense. > > > On May 15, 9:48 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Holly, > > > > I am assuming that your question that you are referring to, that I > > > purportedly did not answer, is: > > > > "Show me where authorized spokespersons for either the Socialist Worker's > > > Party OR the Democratic Party issued such a statement." > > > > The initial report was made by two good wholesome, clean, Christian > > > oriented > > > Irish American gals by the name of Hina Shamsi and Edited by Deborah > > > Pearlstein. Shamsi and Pearlstein released their report to the group > > > called, "Human Rights First", in February, 2006. Here is a copy of their > > > initial report: > > > > http://www.humanrightsfirst.info/pdf/06221-etn-hrf-dic-rep-web.pdf > > > > The report is filled with half truths, prevaricate, misleading statements, > > > and some downright untruthful allegations. Look for yourself. > > > > After this less than scholarly Anti-American piece was penned, a number of > > > far left, radical Anti-American groups picked up on the highlights of the > > > paper, namely, that the United States had killed 98 detainees while in > > > captivity. Folks like the Socialist Workers Party, and Sugarshack had an > > > orgasm when they read such Anti-American, prevaricate tripe, and have > > > continued to propagate the lies and innuendo, all based on a fictitious > > > paper, written by two gals with an Anti-American agenda. > > > > Does that answer your question? > > > > . > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Hollywood > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > KIT, > > > > > How nice. How does your post answer, or even address, the question > > > > Iposed to you? > > > > Extremists, of ALL types, tend to take things out of perspective? No > > > > shit, I THINK thats why they are called "extremists". > > > > > Now, let's get back to your claims of statements you claim were made > > > > by Britain's Socialist Workers party and/or the National democratic > > > > Party here in America. Still waiting to see your proof. > > > > > On May 15, 9:27 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I Googled "98 prisoners" and determined who came up with and released > > > > > the > > > > > story. There is no documentation to support such a claim, it is all > > > > > hyperbole. I am sure that there was some abuse, and that some > > > > > detainees > > > > > died. I also imagine that there were some who had been injured > > > > > prior to > > > > > their captivity who also died while in captivity. > > > > > > War is Hell. > > > > > > Far left extremists tend to take things out of perspective, and forget > > > > that > > > > > aspect; e.g.; that folks tend to die in war. > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Hollywood > > > > > <[email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > Really? > > > > > > > Show me where authorized spokespersons for either the Socialist > > > > > > Worker's Party OR the Democratic Party issued such a statement. > > > > > > Hell, > > > > > > I'll even settle for senior elected officials of the National > > > > > > Democratic Party. > > > > > > Besides The Socialist Workers Party is in Britain, who gives a fuck > > > > > > what Brits say? > > > > > > > WOW, you don't think the Pentagon would actually LIE?? > > > > > > > On May 15, 8:17 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > As stated, (I think here, but possibly in Euwetopia) your claim > > > > > > > that > > > > 98 > > > > > > > prisoners have been killed while in custody by the United States > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > unsubstantiated claims made by the Socialist Workers Party, and a > > > > group > > > > > > > called, "Human Rights First", neither of which are considered > > > > credible, > > > > > > and > > > > > > > the claim is denied by the Pentagon. > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:42 AM, VT VirtualTruth < > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Explain the 98 prisoners who died during 'questioning'? > > > > > > > > > If Bush REALLY had kept America safe 3000 Americans would > > > > > > > > not have died on 9/11. > > > > > > > > > On May 14, 10:10 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sugarshack, Sugarshack, Sugarshack, > > > > > > > > > > There was no torture. Yesterday's Hearing pretty much > > > > established > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > fact. > > > > > > > > > > Get over it. Be thankful to the Bush Administration for > > > > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > bitching, griping, socialist ass alive!!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
