Unfortunately it is apparent what Hollywood means. On May 15, 12:53�pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, but I couldn't help but think what you wrote to Rigs > yesterday; > > "Perhaps you would be better served by reading what I actually say and > not responding based on what you think I "really meant"." > > On May 15, 12:59�pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > frankg, > > > Then all he had to do at some point wa say "I was ONLY talking about > > The Socialist Workers Party of great Britain and NOT the Democratic > > party". > > > On May 15, 10:46�am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hollywood, > > > > Where did Keith tie the claim of 98 killed prisoners to the Democratic > > > Party? �He attributed the claim to the Socialist Workers Party and > > > Human Rights First. �You somehow morphed that into the National > > > Democratic Party. > > > > On May 15, 11:29�am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > KIT, > > > > > You know damned good and well it does not. > > > > Please tell me what position the ladies you mention hold in the > > > > Democratic Party, or for that matter the Socialist Workers Party of > > > > Britain. > > > > > Or did you mean to imply that any individual whom either you, or > > > > themselves, identify as a Demcoratic is automatically a spokesperson > > > > for the party? You DO understand that people can make staements as an > > > > individual and that does not necessarily reflect a position of the > > > > Party itself. > > > > I am a registered Democrat. If i say "the fuckin' Cubs suck" are you > > > > immediately going to bleat "The Democratic Party HATES baseball"? > > > > C'mon man, apply a little simple common sense. > > > > > On May 15, 9:48�am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Holly, > > > > > > I am assuming that your question that you are referring to, that I > > > > > purportedly did not answer, is: > > > > > > "Show me where authorized spokespersons for either the Socialist > > > > > Worker's > > > > > Party OR the Democratic Party issued such a statement." > > > > > > The initial report was made by two good wholesome, clean, Christian > > > > > oriented > > > > > Irish American gals by the name of Hina Shamsi and Edited by Deborah > > > > > Pearlstein. �Shamsi and Pearlstein released their report to the group > > > > > called, "Human Rights First", in February, 2006. � Here is a copy of > > > > > their > > > > > initial report: > > > > > > �http://www.humanrightsfirst.info/pdf/06221-etn-hrf-dic-rep-web.pdf > > > > > > The report is filled with half truths, prevaricate, misleading > > > > > statements, > > > > > and some downright untruthful allegations. � Look for yourself. > > > > > > After this less than scholarly Anti-American piece was penned, a > > > > > number of > > > > > far left, radical Anti-American groups picked up on the highlights of > > > > > the > > > > > paper, namely, that the United States had killed 98 detainees while in > > > > > captivity. �Folks like the Socialist Workers Party, and Sugarshack > > > > > had an > > > > > orgasm when they �read such Anti-American, prevaricate tripe, and have > > > > > continued to propagate the lies and innuendo, all based on a > > > > > fictitious > > > > > paper, written by two gals with an Anti-American agenda. > > > > > > Does that answer your question? > > > > > > . > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Hollywood > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > How nice. How does your post answer, or even address, the question > > > > > > Iposed to you? > > > > > > Extremists, of ALL types, tend to take things out of perspective? No > > > > > > shit, I THINK thats why they are called "extremists". > > > > > > > Now, let's get back to your claims of statements you claim were made > > > > > > by Britain's Socialist Workers party and/or the National democratic > > > > > > Party here in America. Still waiting to see your proof. > > > > > > > On May 15, 9:27 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I Googled "98 prisoners" and determined who came up with and > > > > > > > released the > > > > > > > story. � There is no documentation to support such a claim, it is > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > hyperbole. � I am sure that there was some abuse, and that some > > > > > > > detainees > > > > > > > died. � I also imagine that there were some who had been injured > > > > > > > prior to > > > > > > > their captivity who also died while in captivity. > > > > > > > > War is Hell. > > > > > > > > Far left extremists tend to take things out of perspective, and > > > > > > > forget > > > > > > that > > > > > > > aspect; e.g.; that folks tend to die in war. > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Hollywood > > > > > > > <[email protected] > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > Really? > > > > > > > > > Show me where authorized spokespersons for either the Socialist > > > > > > > > Worker's Party OR the Democratic Party issued such a statement. > > > > > > > > Hell, > > > > > > > > I'll even settle for senior elected officials of the National > > > > > > > > Democratic Party. > > > > > > > > Besides The Socialist Workers Party is in Britain, who gives a > > > > > > > > fuck > > > > > > > > what Brits say? > > > > > > > > > WOW, you don't think the Pentagon would actually LIE?? > > > > > > > > > On May 15, 8:17 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > As stated, (I think here, but possibly in Euwetopia) �your > > > > > > > > > claim that > > > > > > 98 > > > > > > > > > prisoners have been killed while in custody by the United > > > > > > > > > States is > > > > > > > > > unsubstantiated claims made by the Socialist Workers Party, > > > > > > > > > and a > > > > > > group > > > > > > > > > called, "Human Rights First", neither of which are considered > > > > > > credible, > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > the claim is denied by the Pentagon. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:42 AM, VT VirtualTruth < > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Explain the 98 prisoners who died during 'questioning'? > > > > > > > > > > > If Bush REALLY had kept America safe 3000 Americans would > > > > > > > > > > not have died on 9/11. > > > > > > > > > > > On May 14, 10:10 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Sugarshack, Sugarshack, Sugarshack, > > > > > > > > > > > > There was no torture. �Yesterday's Hearing pretty much > > > > > > established > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > fact. > > > > > > > > > > > > Get over it. � Be thankful to the Bush Administration for > > > > > > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > bitching, griping, socialist ass alive!!- Hide quoted > > > > > > > > > > > text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
