KIT, Yeah, but they didn't seem enraged enough to effectively and publically oppose it.
On May 15, 6:40 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Sarge, > > Just to correct the "You" part of your missive: Most conservatives were > outraged with certain portions of the Patriot Act, as well as the > "Responsible Electronic Surveillance Act" of 2007. Most conservatives were > unhappy that President Bush endorsed this Bill, without specific language > that protected American citizens, but our outrage should be at the Congress > who actually passed this heinous legislation. There was language that was > omitted that would have protected American citizens, and been congruous to > the 4th and 5th Amendment to the Constitution, which was specifically left > out of both pieces of legislation. The result is, that the Justice > Department can run roughshod over any American, if they so choose. > > I haven't seen the Obama Administration, (who, Obama, Emanuel and Clinton > voted for this legislation!!) come to advocate the reversal of this > law..... > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:49 PM, SgtUSMC <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We were telling you cons for years this was going to happen. You let > > them get away with wire-tapping just the foreign half (LOL, they never > > heard the US half!!) of a conversation and next thing you know they're > > sitting in your living room with cameras. But you people said it was > > ok if they listen to your phone conversations. So don't complain about > > it, this is exactly what you wanted the government to do.- Hide quoted text > > - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
