Holly, I am aware that you don't "deal" in a lot of facts, nor do you ever want to adddress far left extremists who are attempting to ruin our Nation.
You don't "deal" in any facts that adversely affect this Nation which are caused by far left extremists with an Anti-American agenda, but that doesn't make it right. Here is but one example of you being critical of one young man who was doing relatively little harm, yet you ignore the huge fraud by ACORN. That speaks volumes. On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote: > > KIT, > > Sorry, don't deal with "probably". Nor "relatively little". "IF this > kid had been caught doing,,,,,,,,"? > > > > > On Jun 19, 11:19 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Holly, > > > > It was documented happening in Pennsylvania and Ohio, but it happened in > > probably all 50 states. The organization is corrupt, the fact that they > > endorsed President Obama, (or any candidate, I would be outraged just the > > same if they had endorsed McCain!) and are taking tax dollars to > "community > > organize" and "Get Out The Vote", on behalf of any one candidate is not > only > > morally wrong, it is illegal. > > > > My point of the "Blogger" was just a jab, as Studio has pointed out, > there > > has been relatively little coverage of this kid out in Orange County, but > I > > surmise that this is because his alleged offense is minor. "IF" this > kid > > had been caught doing what those kids in Pennsylvania and Ohio had been > > doing, it is my sincere belief that there would have been a huge, > national > > media storm of coverage!! > > > > http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2009/05/7_pennsylvania_aco... > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Hollywood <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > All I ever saw was ACORN encouraging people to get out and vote for > > > the candidate of their choice. > > > > > Blog? Blogs are not the news media. Any fool can start a blog and say > > > whatever the fuck he/she wants to. > > > I sincerely hope any group of "dozens" who voted "hundreds of times" > > > was caught, prosecuted and sent to jail. Where did this happen? > > > > > On Jun 19, 10:45 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Holly, > > > > > > From a constitutional standpoint, I am not opposed to any group > > > encouraging > > > > individuals to vote, but not using my tax dollars while at the same > time > > > > endorsing a candidate that I don't support. That is illegal, and > ACORN > > > as > > > > well as "Get Out The Vote" got away with it, unscathed. > > > > > > What ABC News is doing here next week is unprecedented. You, I, or > no > > > other > > > > American has ever seen such a thing. There are laws that allow for > the > > > > President to be covered, on national television when he has a news > > > > conference. That is not what ABC News is doing. > > > > > > When I say, "hardly cover"; I am talking about the hypocrisy in > > > coverage. > > > > By example, Fat Boy out in Orange County made the Moonbat's blog (and > > > > probably the NYT's front page tomorrow). The dozens of ACORN Law > > > students > > > > who fraudulently voted hundreds of times didn't. > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Hollywood < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > What defines "enough" coverage for you? > > > > > How do you define "hardly cover"? > > > > > "Infomercial"? Any time the President of the United States opens > his > > > > > mouth, that's a legit news story. Sorry, that's the way it is. > > > > > > > Why would you be against ANY organization encouraging, even > helping, > > > > > people to exercise their Constituional right to vote? > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 9:52 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Holly & Studio, (And Richard!!) > > > > > > > > It's not that I dispute it, I just point out the hypocrisy. > > > RIchard's > > > > > > example of the New York Times and something like seven other > > > news/media > > > > > > organizations including McClatchie, Knight-Ridder, Hearst, Time > > > Magazine > > > > > and > > > > > > others, joined in, and under the Florida Sunshine laws gathered > the > > > > > > information that indisputably established that President Bush won > the > > > > > > election here in Florida, yet as Richard pointed out, the story > was > > > > > buried. > > > > > > This is true with so many stories, current events and issues, and > > > > > frankly, I > > > > > > don't recall our news organizations being so partisan and in the > tank > > > as > > > > > > they are today. > > > > > > > > Here is ABC News doing an "infomercial" in the White House next > week, > > > and > > > > > > hardly anyone or any media entity is mentioning this first of a > kind > > > > > event. > > > > > > > > Back to the point, I just sent links to a similar story that was > > > hardly > > > > > > covered only seven months ago, and yet the events surrounding > ACORN > > > and > > > > > "Get > > > > > > The Vote Out" was hardly covered by mainstream media. > > > > > > > > Neither Holly or Studio ever focus upon issues like this; it is > only > > > when > > > > > > FOX News doesn't cowtow to some far left, minute story. > > > > > > > > Incidentally, I have been watching CNN for the last hour and a > half, > > > and > > > > > > there has been nothing on CNN or Headline News regarding this > story > > > in > > > > > that > > > > > > amount of time..... > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Hollywood < > > > [email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > bruce, > > > > > > > > > Do you dispute it or not? Simple enough question. > > > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 9:30 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > lame response > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM, studio <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 7:36 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hey Studio!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > I say this respectfully......Yea......You are....... > > > > > > > > > > > Then I'm running dead last then. > > > > > > > > > > > I posted a story from a blog, and there's nothing > hypocritical > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > it unless it's the Fox News non-coverage of it because it's > GOP > > > > > > > > > related. > > > > > > > > > > > It might be one guy, I don't know, but he heads a company > that > > > does > > > > > > > > > it, and was found guilty. > > > > > > > > > > > Do you dispute this?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
