Hi Keith,
As evidenced in this thread and others ( some ) are students of
semantics Bill Clinton style. They are not responding to a view but
splitting hairs. It is just another leftist Saul Alinsky tactic to
avoid truth & facts such as you have presented in this thread .
*************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
On Jun 20, 9:36 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Holly,
>
> I am aware that you don't "deal" in a lot of facts, nor do you ever want to
> adddress far left extremists who are attempting to ruin our Nation.
>
> You don't "deal" in any facts that adversely affect this Nation which are
> caused by far left extremists with an Anti-American agenda, but that doesn't
> make it right. Here is but one example of you being critical of one young
> man who was doing relatively little harm, yet you ignore the huge fraud by
> ACORN.
>
> That speaks volumes.
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > KIT,
>
> > Sorry, don't deal with "probably". Nor "relatively little". "IF this
> > kid had been caught doing,,,,,,,,"?
>
> > On Jun 19, 11:19 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Holly,
>
> > > It was documented happening in Pennsylvania and Ohio, but it happened in
> > > probably all 50 states. The organization is corrupt, the fact that they
> > > endorsed President Obama, (or any candidate, I would be outraged just the
> > > same if they had endorsed McCain!) and are taking tax dollars to
> > "community
> > > organize" and "Get Out The Vote", on behalf of any one candidate is not
> > only
> > > morally wrong, it is illegal.
>
> > > My point of the "Blogger" was just a jab, as Studio has pointed out,
> > there
> > > has been relatively little coverage of this kid out in Orange County, but
> > I
> > > surmise that this is because his alleged offense is minor. "IF" this
> > kid
> > > had been caught doing what those kids in Pennsylvania and Ohio had been
> > > doing, it is my sincere belief that there would have been a huge,
> > national
> > > media storm of coverage!!
>
> > >http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2009/05/7_pennsylvania_aco...
>
> > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > KIT,
>
> > > > All I ever saw was ACORN encouraging people to get out and vote for
> > > > the candidate of their choice.
>
> > > > Blog? Blogs are not the news media. Any fool can start a blog and say
> > > > whatever the fuck he/she wants to.
> > > > I sincerely hope any group of "dozens" who voted "hundreds of times"
> > > > was caught, prosecuted and sent to jail. Where did this happen?
>
> > > > On Jun 19, 10:45 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Holly,
>
> > > > > From a constitutional standpoint, I am not opposed to any group
> > > > encouraging
> > > > > individuals to vote, but not using my tax dollars while at the same
> > time
> > > > > endorsing a candidate that I don't support. That is illegal, and
> > ACORN
> > > > as
> > > > > well as "Get Out The Vote" got away with it, unscathed.
>
> > > > > What ABC News is doing here next week is unprecedented. You, I, or
> > no
> > > > other
> > > > > American has ever seen such a thing. There are laws that allow for
> > the
> > > > > President to be covered, on national television when he has a news
> > > > > conference. That is not what ABC News is doing.
>
> > > > > When I say, "hardly cover"; I am talking about the hypocrisy in
> > > > coverage.
> > > > > By example, Fat Boy out in Orange County made the Moonbat's blog (and
> > > > > probably the NYT's front page tomorrow). The dozens of ACORN Law
> > > > students
> > > > > who fraudulently voted hundreds of times didn't.
>
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Hollywood <
> > [email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > KIT,
>
> > > > > > What defines "enough" coverage for you?
> > > > > > How do you define "hardly cover"?
> > > > > > "Infomercial"? Any time the President of the United States opens
> > his
> > > > > > mouth, that's a legit news story. Sorry, that's the way it is.
>
> > > > > > Why would you be against ANY organization encouraging, even
> > helping,
> > > > > > people to exercise their Constituional right to vote?
>
> > > > > > On Jun 19, 9:52 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Holly & Studio, (And Richard!!)
>
> > > > > > > It's not that I dispute it, I just point out the hypocrisy.
> > > > RIchard's
> > > > > > > example of the New York Times and something like seven other
> > > > news/media
> > > > > > > organizations including McClatchie, Knight-Ridder, Hearst, Time
> > > > Magazine
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > others, joined in, and under the Florida Sunshine laws gathered
> > the
> > > > > > > information that indisputably established that President Bush won
> > the
> > > > > > > election here in Florida, yet as Richard pointed out, the story
> > was
> > > > > > buried.
> > > > > > > This is true with so many stories, current events and issues, and
> > > > > > frankly, I
> > > > > > > don't recall our news organizations being so partisan and in the
> > tank
> > > > as
> > > > > > > they are today.
>
> > > > > > > Here is ABC News doing an "infomercial" in the White House next
> > week,
> > > > and
> > > > > > > hardly anyone or any media entity is mentioning this first of a
> > kind
> > > > > > event.
>
> > > > > > > Back to the point, I just sent links to a similar story that was
> > > > hardly
> > > > > > > covered only seven months ago, and yet the events surrounding
> > ACORN
> > > > and
> > > > > > "Get
> > > > > > > The Vote Out" was hardly covered by mainstream media.
>
> > > > > > > Neither Holly or Studio ever focus upon issues like this; it is
> > only
> > > > when
> > > > > > > FOX News doesn't cowtow to some far left, minute story.
>
> > > > > > > Incidentally, I have been watching CNN for the last hour and a
> > half,
> > > > and
> > > > > > > there has been nothing on CNN or Headline News regarding this
> > story
> > > > in
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > amount of time.....
>
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Hollywood <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > bruce,
>
> > > > > > > > Do you dispute it or not? Simple enough question.
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 9:30 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > lame response
>
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM, studio <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 7:36 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Hey Studio!!!
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I say this respectfully......Yea......You are.......
>
> > > > > > > > > > Then I'm running dead last then.
>
> > > > > > > > > > I posted a story from a blog, and there's nothing
> > hypocritical
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > it unless it's the Fox News non-coverage of it because it's
> > GOP
> > > > > > > > > > related.
>
> > > > > > > > > > It might be one guy, I don't know, but he heads a company
> > that
> > > > does
> > > > > > > > > > it, and was found guilty.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Do you dispute this?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
