Hi Keith,
The left wing agenda is well documented and is being
exposed. David Horowitz a former marxist/ far lefty wrote a book
entitled " One-Party Classroom " . It describes how universities and
left wing professors are systematically indoctrinating students to far
left ideology through left wing courses and even intimidation. Again a
play out of the Saul Alinsky playbook !
********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
On Jun 20, 10:24 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Good Morning Studio!!
>
> Okay, I have to admit something. I don't read all of Travis's posts. I
> don't read all of Bruce's posts, and I don't read all of Dick's posts. I do
> read a lot of them, and I don't necessarily want to see them quit their
> style of posting, but I acknowledge that the three of them are "prolific"
> posters. What makes their posts seem more voluminous, is when there are no
> other members posting......Sort of.......
>
> Unlike Hollywood, other partisan Democrats, and especially other far left
> extremist radical socialist-elitists that frequently post here, I am
> critical of any policy that is outside of the scope of American interests.
> This can be witnessed by googling my name in the Search Engine here in the
> Group, and seeing how critical I was of a number of the past
> Administration's policies.
>
> Studio, I just saw your most recent post, and once again, you demonstrate
> your hypocrisy! First, I haven't seen this story regarding this kid in
> Orange County California on any other news channel. I've only seen it
> posted on the far left extremists' blog that you shared with the group
> yesterday. You had to dig to find this story, which is minor, as compared
> to the fraud that ACORN and "Get Out The Vote" perpetrated against
> Americans and our Nation. You have remained silent on this fraud, yet you
> choose to attack FOX News and conservatives in general over something that
> is "Much Ado About Nothing"; especially as compared to the ACORN fraud!!
>
> Good Morning Sage!!
>
> I agree whole heartedly, and this is clearly a trick by most far left
> extremists who either, (1) Are uninformed, and cannot have an intelligent
> discussion because they are literally uninformed, and end up slinging nasty
> personal barbs or attempt to try and change the subject if they cannot think
> of something nasty to hurl at their opponent; or (2) They have an
> Anti-American agenda, and are intent on seeing our Nation turned into a
> Third World, or Fourth World Nation-State. They care not what a reply or
> response is to their Anti-American rhetoric, they are only intent on getting
> out their hateful dogma and hope that it might strike a cord, especially
> with those who would like to lay around and have tax payers support them.
>
> Yes, it is clearly a page out of Saul Alinsky's playbook!!
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Keith,
>
> > As evidenced in this thread and others ( some ) are students of
> > semantics Bill Clinton style. They are not responding to a view but
> > splitting hairs. It is just another leftist Saul Alinsky tactic to
> > avoid truth & facts such as you have presented in this thread .
>
> > *************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
>
> > On Jun 20, 9:36 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Holly,
>
> > > I am aware that you don't "deal" in a lot of facts, nor do you ever want
> > to
> > > adddress far left extremists who are attempting to ruin our Nation.
>
> > > You don't "deal" in any facts that adversely affect this Nation which are
> > > caused by far left extremists with an Anti-American agenda, but that
> > doesn't
> > > make it right. Here is but one example of you being critical of one
> > young
> > > man who was doing relatively little harm, yet you ignore the huge fraud
> > by
> > > ACORN.
>
> > > That speaks volumes.
>
> > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > KIT,
>
> > > > Sorry, don't deal with "probably". Nor "relatively little". "IF this
> > > > kid had been caught doing,,,,,,,,"?
>
> > > > On Jun 19, 11:19 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Holly,
>
> > > > > It was documented happening in Pennsylvania and Ohio, but it happened
> > in
> > > > > probably all 50 states. The organization is corrupt, the fact that
> > they
> > > > > endorsed President Obama, (or any candidate, I would be outraged just
> > the
> > > > > same if they had endorsed McCain!) and are taking tax dollars to
> > > > "community
> > > > > organize" and "Get Out The Vote", on behalf of any one candidate is
> > not
> > > > only
> > > > > morally wrong, it is illegal.
>
> > > > > My point of the "Blogger" was just a jab, as Studio has pointed out,
> > > > there
> > > > > has been relatively little coverage of this kid out in Orange County,
> > but
> > > > I
> > > > > surmise that this is because his alleged offense is minor. "IF"
> > this
> > > > kid
> > > > > had been caught doing what those kids in Pennsylvania and Ohio had
> > been
> > > > > doing, it is my sincere belief that there would have been a huge,
> > > > national
> > > > > media storm of coverage!!
>
> >http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2009/05/7_pennsylvania_aco...
>
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Hollywood <
> > [email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > KIT,
>
> > > > > > All I ever saw was ACORN encouraging people to get out and vote for
> > > > > > the candidate of their choice.
>
> > > > > > Blog? Blogs are not the news media. Any fool can start a blog and
> > say
> > > > > > whatever the fuck he/she wants to.
> > > > > > I sincerely hope any group of "dozens" who voted "hundreds of
> > times"
> > > > > > was caught, prosecuted and sent to jail. Where did this happen?
>
> > > > > > On Jun 19, 10:45 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > Holly,
>
> > > > > > > From a constitutional standpoint, I am not opposed to any group
> > > > > > encouraging
> > > > > > > individuals to vote, but not using my tax dollars while at the
> > same
> > > > time
> > > > > > > endorsing a candidate that I don't support. That is illegal, and
> > > > ACORN
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > > well as "Get Out The Vote" got away with it, unscathed.
>
> > > > > > > What ABC News is doing here next week is unprecedented. You, I,
> > or
> > > > no
> > > > > > other
> > > > > > > American has ever seen such a thing. There are laws that allow
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > > President to be covered, on national television when he has a
> > news
> > > > > > > conference. That is not what ABC News is doing.
>
> > > > > > > When I say, "hardly cover"; I am talking about the hypocrisy in
> > > > > > coverage.
> > > > > > > By example, Fat Boy out in Orange County made the Moonbat's blog
> > (and
> > > > > > > probably the NYT's front page tomorrow). The dozens of ACORN Law
> > > > > > students
> > > > > > > who fraudulently voted hundreds of times didn't.
>
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Hollywood <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > KIT,
>
> > > > > > > > What defines "enough" coverage for you?
> > > > > > > > How do you define "hardly cover"?
> > > > > > > > "Infomercial"? Any time the President of the United States
> > opens
> > > > his
> > > > > > > > mouth, that's a legit news story. Sorry, that's the way it is.
>
> > > > > > > > Why would you be against ANY organization encouraging, even
> > > > helping,
> > > > > > > > people to exercise their Constituional right to vote?
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 9:52 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Holly & Studio, (And Richard!!)
>
> > > > > > > > > It's not that I dispute it, I just point out the hypocrisy.
> > > > > > RIchard's
> > > > > > > > > example of the New York Times and something like seven other
> > > > > > news/media
> > > > > > > > > organizations including McClatchie, Knight-Ridder, Hearst,
> > Time
> > > > > > Magazine
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > others, joined in, and under the Florida Sunshine laws
> > gathered
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > information that indisputably established that President Bush
> > won
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > election here in Florida, yet as Richard pointed out, the
> > story
> > > > was
> > > > > > > > buried.
> > > > > > > > > This is true with so many stories, current events and issues,
> > and
> > > > > > > > frankly, I
> > > > > > > > > don't recall our news organizations being so partisan and in
> > the
> > > > tank
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > they are today.
>
> > > > > > > > > Here is ABC News doing an "infomercial" in the White House
> > next
> > > > week,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > hardly anyone or any media entity is mentioning this first of
> > a
> > > > kind
> > > > > > > > event.
>
> > > > > > > > > Back to the point, I just sent links to a similar story that
> > was
> > > > > > hardly
> > > > > > > > > covered only seven months ago, and yet the events surrounding
> > > > ACORN
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > "Get
> > > > > > > > > The Vote Out" was hardly covered by mainstream media.
>
> > > > > > > > > Neither Holly or Studio ever focus upon issues like this; it
> > is
> > > > only
> > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > FOX News doesn't cowtow to some far left, minute story.
>
> > > > > > > > > Incidentally, I have been watching CNN for the last hour and
> > a
> > > > half,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > there has been nothing on CNN or Headline News regarding this
> > > > story
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > amount of time.....
>
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Hollywood <
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > bruce,
>
> > > > > > > > > > Do you dispute it or not? Simple enough question.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 9:30 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > lame response
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM, studio <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 7:36 pm, Keith In Tampa <
> > [email protected]
>
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
