Uhm......Sugarshack, I don't know why I bother, I guess it is because I like you, but like any child, sometimes there comes a time when I must take your pants down and spank you.
>From the Congressional Budget Office: "The federal government’s financing of health care will total more than $1 trillion in 2009, " http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc10311/06-16-ConradLetter.htm As usual, you are ignoring the facts, and like most Moonbats, you seem to want to cherry pick. Even Kennedy's plan will cost over one trillion initially. You might want to look at the numbers, and here is an article that frames the actual costs a little better. Can you say, "One Point Six Trillion"??? (Just in the first year, and this doesn't cover everyone!!!) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/18/AR2009061804109.html On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:06 AM, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]>wrote: > > Keith, your 99% sure is usually 100% wrong, > It is 10 years. > > http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre55e74c-us-usa-healthcare-cbo/ > > On Jun 23, 7:09 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sean, > > > > I don't have the numbers in front of me, and I don't have time to go and > > look for them now, but I am 99 percent positive, that the Democrat plan, > > (all versions of it) were not 1 trillion in ten years. The plan(s) were > one > > trillion in one year, like by 2010, and that was using low ball numbers. > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:57 PM, VT VirtualTruth > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > So let's do the math, $250 a month for basic > > > high deductible health insurance. That comes to > > > $3000 a year per person. > > > > > 40,000,000 Uninsured people. > > > > > Total cost $120,000,000,000 a year. > > > or 1.2 Trillion in 10 years, > > > > > The No-Publicans were against The Democrat health > > > plan because in 10 years it would cost over $1 Trillion. > > > > > I am using LOW numbers by the way.....My insurance > > > costs $1400 a month for a family with dental. > > > > > On Jun 23, 5:20 pm, snarky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If so, what are your thoughts? > > > > > >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123931859150606821.html > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
