Dumb Dumb, first you posted this to ANOTHER board, we are having this conversation else where.
Second HealthCare as a WHOLE may be over a Trillion dollars, but the Kennedy plan is over 10 years, not a Trillion dollars the first year which is what you said. It is hard to have an intelligent conversation with your Ilk. You all disdain actually doing the research and rely on the Drug addict to give you your talking points. On Jun 24, 8:49 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Uhm......Sugarshack, > > I don't know why I bother, I guess it is because I like you, but like any > child, sometimes there comes a time when I must take your pants down and > spank you. > > From the Congressional Budget Office: > > "The federal government’s financing of health care will total more than $1 > trillion in 2009, " > > http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc10311/06-16-ConradLetter.htm > > As usual, you are ignoring the facts, and like most Moonbats, you seem to > want to cherry pick. Even Kennedy's plan will cost over one trillion > initially. You might want to look at the numbers, and here is an article > that frames the actual costs a little better. > > Can you say, "One Point Six Trillion"??? (Just in the first year, and this > doesn't cover everyone!!!) > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/18/AR200... > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:06 AM, VT VirtualTruth > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Keith, your 99% sure is usually 100% wrong, > > It is 10 years. > > >http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre55e74c-us-usa-healthcare-cbo/ > > > On Jun 23, 7:09 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sean, > > > > I don't have the numbers in front of me, and I don't have time to go and > > > look for them now, but I am 99 percent positive, that the Democrat plan, > > > (all versions of it) were not 1 trillion in ten years. The plan(s) were > > one > > > trillion in one year, like by 2010, and that was using low ball numbers. > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:57 PM, VT VirtualTruth > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > So let's do the math, $250 a month for basic > > > > high deductible health insurance. That comes to > > > > $3000 a year per person. > > > > > 40,000,000 Uninsured people. > > > > > Total cost $120,000,000,000 a year. > > > > or 1.2 Trillion in 10 years, > > > > > The No-Publicans were against The Democrat health > > > > plan because in 10 years it would cost over $1 Trillion. > > > > > I am using LOW numbers by the way.....My insurance > > > > costs $1400 a month for a family with dental. > > > > > On Jun 23, 5:20 pm, snarky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If so, what are your thoughts? > > > > > >http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123931859150606821.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
