Mrs. Rabbit, LOL! When were you guaranteed it would be safe to live as a free person under our Constituion and Bill of Rights? Have Americans become sniveling cowards? You GOD-DAMN right there are limitations on how we are protected . How about the Govt. ban the private ownership of firearms so you can feel safer? That OK with you?
How about the govt. require an internal passport and have you ask permission to travel outside your home county? Report where your going and why and for how long you'll be gone? Have to keep track of the movements of "potential terrorists and trouble-makers" don't they? You don't think the govt. would give "national security" as the reason you doing such a thing? YOU are the one that needs to "cowboy up" and understand that our rights as Americans under the Constituion and Bill of Rights are more important that the lives of a few thousand Americans or even a few million. Why yes, I usually do cry when I lose a member of my family. I grieve for awhile and then go on with my life. What's your point? Oh hell, why bother. Maybe you really are as dull-witted as you pretend to be. YOU are the coward dear lady. Your precious life is more important to you than your Constituion, your freedom and worse the freedom of generations of Americans yet unborn. On Jun 29, 11:51 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: > nanana boo....stick your head in....well, you get the picture...:D > > Seriously Holly, do you want to limit HOW we are protected?? What if > you have your way...and GOD forbid anything else happens on US > soil....OBL or some other mad man/woman repeats similar acts as > 9/11....your family members are victims...you would cry like a stuck > pig because your family wasn't protected... whine whine whine. Good > lord man, suck it up... > > Studio will be posting his 9/11 conspiracy theories again! > > On Jun 29, 12:37 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Mrs, Rabbit, > > > Once again, your position is only you and your life to be important, > > that principles and legal prededents are not. OK, if that's the way > > you want to play it. > > Methinks you are pretending to be a lot more dull-witted than you > > actually are. > > > On Jun 29, 11:15 am, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > OMG Hollywood, here we go chasing tails again.....sigh. > > > > Regardless of what you *hear* or read, as Dick mentioned, they have > > > and will continue to do these acts. Not that Obama will admit it, but > > > he stays up late at night reading your post....yeah, he's on to you. > > > Better get a wireless cards, but then again, they have GPS....oh well, > > > looks like your screwed! j/k > > > > I understand your point Hollywood, really I do. But I do not do > > > anything that would warrant me to live such a secrect life. Like I > > > said, if Obama, yo mama, Bush or even Rush the band wanted to listen > > > to each and every phone call in and out of here, then so be it. I > > > have nothing to hide, so there is no reason to *protect family > > > members* from ease dropping. Besides, we only pay for the USE of the > > > lines/airwaves....they do not belong to us, we rent them. Mama always > > > said to never say anything you would be ashamed of or regret and if > > > any member of my family is using MY service to break the law, then > > > they need to be caught, period. What do you think Obama would do with > > > the information about my kids latest boyfriend saga? Or my Dads > > > latest lawn report? Zip, nodda dang thang! > > > > Ok, I've humored you, feel better now? :D > > > > On Jun 29, 11:13 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Mrs. Rabbit, > > > > > Ok, you asked for it. > > > > > YOU have nothing to hide? So, your personal little life is the only > > > > consideration here? The Constituion and Bill of Rights is not > > > > important? You don't believe in a basic right of privacy.? All the > > > > govt. has to do is mutter, "well, it's for your own good" and you will > > > > go down on bended knee and submit to anything you're told to submit > > > > to? > > > > Yes, THEY tell you that they are only listening for hints of terrorist > > > > and/or criminal activity. But just who is it that gets to define just > > > > what a "suspected terrorist or criminal is"? How are you going to stop > > > > the govt. from using ANY information they might aquire with such > > > > "taps", in ANY matter they choose? > > > > A "suspected terrorist" is anyone the govt. says is one. You would > > > > hand the govt. the tools to supress any one they want to? > > > > > "He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy > > > > from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a > > > > precedent that will reach to himself." THOMAS PAINE > > > > > On Jun 28, 11:21 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I am not opposed to wire tapping, period. I have nothing to hide and > > > > > if they want to listen to my father complain about his aches and pains > > > > > or my teens latest boyfriens news or me getting Grandma's recipe, then > > > > > so be it. If it helps keep me and mine safe, then why would I oppose > > > > > it? > > > > > > On Jun 29, 12:06 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Mrs. Rabbit, > > > > > > > Are you serious? You sure that's the tactic you want to take? MUST I > > > > > > take the time to refute such an obviously flawed arguement? Think > > > > > > about it a bit more. > > > > > > > On Jun 28, 10:53 pm, "Mrs. Rabbit" <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > LOL, name calling is so second grade Fred! > > > > > > > > So I take it you oppose wiretapping? What are you afraid of? If > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > are doing the right thing, then what does it matter? As many > > > > > > > phones > > > > > > > calls made on a daily basis, there is NO way of being able to > > > > > > > listen > > > > > > > to them all anyways. It's the people who are sending up red > > > > > > > flags, > > > > > > > people of interest, whom they seek and monitor. > > > > > > > > BTW, which branch of the military were you in? > > > > > > > > On Jun 28, 11:35 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > So what do all those "Constitutionalists" Republicans and > > > > > > > > Conservatives think about his criminal acts in this regard? > > > > > > > > Or is the Constitution only important until it interferes with > > > > > > > > the GOP > > > > > > > > agenda?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
