Fred,
Good Gotcha! I inadvertently used the proper form
or spelling of the word " bear ". However I still know what ' the
right to bear arms " means and it doesn't mean what those who would
dis-credit the second amendment want it to mean... that is; gun
owners arms should be " bare " of guns and the right to own them.
Thank you for the correction Fred.
*********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
On Jun 30, 1:26 pm, Frederick The Moderate
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Sage2 <[email protected] wrote: "Leftist,socialist liberals have
>
> difficulty with definitions of words, like ' the right to bare arms "
> Where did they go to school?"
>
> ROFL! I love this kind of irony! It's like when Bush said "Many
> illegal immigrants can't even read good". I guess all those Lefties
> went to school in a place where they would realize that the "Right to
> BARE arms" would mean the right to short sleeves!
> LOL!
> "The government cannot deny our second amendment right to bare
> arms..." LOL!
> Where did THIS Captain of Intellect go to school?
>
> On Jun 28, 8:51 pm,
>
>
>
> > Keith,
>
> > yet they want to take them
> > away. What is so difficult to understand in these words?
> > Another word they don't seem to comprehend is ' illegal " as in "
> > illegal immigration ". They think it means " undocumented " as in "
> > undocumented immigrants ". The murder of Mary Jo Kopechne ; now that
> > is undocumented. Twenty minutes in a court room by Teddy; now that is
> > documented ! Another word is " war " ! They think war is some hide and
> > seek or tag game, " terrorist" to them means an excuse for "fear".
> > The greatest danger to our country at this time is Obama and his
> > administration, and that we should all fear. The only thing Obama has
> > been able to stimulate so far is Chris Matthews with a tingle up his
> > leg.
> > The government cannot deny our second amendment right to bare arms and
> > they are wasting their time in trying to do so.
>
> > *******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
> > On Jun 28, 4:43 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Fred,
>
> > > I am not sure where you are going with this, and I read your message in
> > > another post; something to the effect that the government should restrict
> > > folks from bringing firearms (I think you referenced a bazooka) to a
> > > baseball game.....Or something or other.
>
> > > You have literally been brainwashed by far left extremists who don't like
> > > our Constitution, especially the Clause that allows for Americans to
> > > defend
> > > themselves. The Second Amendment has worked just fine throughout our
> > > History, and has proven to be one of the reasons that we continue to
> > > remain
> > > a vibrant, free Nation-State.
>
> > > I strongly encourage you to go and read the Federalist, as well as the
> > > Anti-Federalist Papers, both of which supported the language contained
> > > within the Second Amendment.
>
> > > There were three major reasons for placing and documenting this
> > > unalienable
> > > right on paper:
>
> > > 1. For Americans to be able to protect their homes and personal affects
> > > from domestic threats, to include, thieves, rogues, bandits, wildlife, axe
> > > murderers, etc.;
>
> > > 2. For Americans to deter any acts of aggression from foreign invaders;
> > > but most importantly,
>
> > > 3. To insure that our government was kept in check.
>
> > > This third prong is the part that folks like Chuckie Schumer, DiFi, Babs
> > > Boxer, Maxine Waters, Bella Pelosi, and a host of other confused
> > > socialist-elitists who have an Anti-American agenda cannot stand, and wish
> > > to see done away with.
>
> > > In other words, if the government has a tank, then I should have the right
> > > to have a tank.
>
> > > There should be no restrictions on any law abiding citizen from owning
> > > whatever firearm he so chooses, it has nothing to do with hunting, it has
> > > to
> > > do with deterrence!!
>
> > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Frederick
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > [image: Right to Bear Amrs.JPG]
>
> > > Right to Bear Amrs.JPG
> > > 450KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
