Turtle: > I couldn't give a damn what you do.  You clearly are not a
> professional in this field.
Well, classy amd civil response aside, I didn't realize you were an
attorney specializing in Constitutional law. As the subject is not
guns but rather the laws regarding them, I wonder did you get your JD?
Because obviously, being a great singer doesn't make one a
"professional" in intellectual property law. And certainly, there are
whackjob survivalists on a compound in North Dakota somewhere, who
could tell me in detail, the rate of velocity based on caliber etc...
But obviously that doesn't make them a "professional" regarding
Constitutional Law. So Turtle, whereja get that law degree again?
;-)
I guess some people just don't have the class or strength to
respectfully disagree with differing opinions...



On Jun 28, 7:56 pm, The Supreme Turtle <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I couldn't give a damn what you do.  You clearly are not a
> professional in this field.  I know more about guns than you will ever
> know-in fact I suspect I daily forget more about guns than you will
> ever know.  Its illegal for a gang-banger to possess any firearm.  all
> gun laws do that restrict honest people from owning guns is to make
> them more likely to be crime victims.
>
> On Jun 28, 10:54 pm, Frederick The Moderate
>
>
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All gun laws do is make it less likely that
>
> > > the intended victim of such a nutcase are disarmed.
>
> > I disagree with you. I own a gun and do not go around armed.
> > Additionally, if any unregistered weapon found in the possession of a
> > gang-banger were grounds for immediate incarceration, I might have one
> > more friend who was alive. So I disagree with you on that point as
> > well.
> > I don't believe guns should be banned but we are obviously very far
> > apart on our views and neither of us will change our minds. So I will
> > respectfully agree to disagree.
>
> > On Jun 28, 7:23 pm, The Supreme Turtle <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Those intent on doing murder (ie violating the most serious felony
> > > statute on the books) aren't going to be deterred by a law making
> > > owning a gun a felony.  All gun laws do is make it less likely that
> > > the intended victim of such a nutcase are disarmed.
>
> > > On Jun 28, 2:33 pm, Frederick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > [image: Right to Bear Amrs.JPG]
>
> > > >  Right to Bear Amrs.JPG
> > > > 450KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to