Keith,
Leftist,socialist liberals have difficulty with definitions
of words, like ' the right to bare arms "; yet they want to take them
away. What is so difficult to understand in these words? Where did
they go to school?
Another word they don't seem to comprehend is ' illegal " as in "
illegal immigration ". They think it means " undocumented " as in "
undocumented immigrants ". The murder of Mary Jo Kopechne ; now that
is undocumented. Twenty minutes in a court room by Teddy; now that is
documented ! Another word is " war " ! They think war is some hide and
seek or tag game, " terrorist" to them means an excuse for "fear".
The greatest danger to our country at this time is Obama and his
administration, and that we should all fear. The only thing Obama has
been able to stimulate so far is Chris Matthews with a tingle up his
leg.
The government cannot deny our second amendment right to bare arms and
they are wasting their time in trying to do so.
*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
On Jun 28, 4:43 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fred,
>
> I am not sure where you are going with this, and I read your message in
> another post; something to the effect that the government should restrict
> folks from bringing firearms (I think you referenced a bazooka) to a
> baseball game.....Or something or other.
>
> You have literally been brainwashed by far left extremists who don't like
> our Constitution, especially the Clause that allows for Americans to defend
> themselves. The Second Amendment has worked just fine throughout our
> History, and has proven to be one of the reasons that we continue to remain
> a vibrant, free Nation-State.
>
> I strongly encourage you to go and read the Federalist, as well as the
> Anti-Federalist Papers, both of which supported the language contained
> within the Second Amendment.
>
> There were three major reasons for placing and documenting this unalienable
> right on paper:
>
> 1. For Americans to be able to protect their homes and personal affects
> from domestic threats, to include, thieves, rogues, bandits, wildlife, axe
> murderers, etc.;
>
> 2. For Americans to deter any acts of aggression from foreign invaders;
> but most importantly,
>
> 3. To insure that our government was kept in check.
>
> This third prong is the part that folks like Chuckie Schumer, DiFi, Babs
> Boxer, Maxine Waters, Bella Pelosi, and a host of other confused
> socialist-elitists who have an Anti-American agenda cannot stand, and wish
> to see done away with.
>
> In other words, if the government has a tank, then I should have the right
> to have a tank.
>
> There should be no restrictions on any law abiding citizen from owning
> whatever firearm he so chooses, it has nothing to do with hunting, it has to
> do with deterrence!!
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Frederick <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > [image: Right to Bear Amrs.JPG]
>
>
>
> Right to Bear Amrs.JPG
> 450KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
