Silver,

"Some politician" would include individual and collectively members of
the House and Senate.

On Jul 10, 8:54 pm, sILVER bELLE <[email protected]> wrote:
> The president of the USA does NOT make the decisions...its the HOUSE, THEN to 
> the Senate, THEN to the Pres. to sign or not.  Did yall ALL FAIL American 
> History??"  APPARENTY (misspelled)
>
> Obama can't do a damn thing without the HOUSE.
>
> Even BUSH did not 'run the country....
>
> Its the "We the People" ....Yall don't know your ass from your head.
>
>  sILVER bELLE
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:04:04 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Anyone see a problem with this logic_
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
>
> > Richard,
>
> > OK, in that respect I will have to agree with you. If there is a way
> > to circumvent the intent of the Constituion and/or Bill Of Rights some
> > politician will find it in such a matter asa to be able to insist he
> > obeyed the "letter of the law".
>
> > Of course he didn't, thanks to President Bush.
>
> > On Jul 10, 3:51 pm, RICHARD BROWN <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hollywood, it has zip to do with your question posed to Travis.  I was
> > > pointing out that all of our politicians do the same thing when using
> > > executive power.  They find ways around the other branches of
> > > government.  It is part of the power game that they all play.
> > > If Obama can commit the U.S. to in effect go along with the Kyoto
> > > Treaty without actually getting the Senate to approve it, he will.
> > > Politicians are very adroit at doing an end run around the opposition
> > > or side stepping the rules and regulations to get what they want.
> > > Did Obama go to Congress to get a declaration of war in Afghanistan
> > > before he sent an additional 30,000 troops there, or before he used
> > > drones to bomb Pakistan?
>
> > > On Jul 10, 1:41 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Richard,
>
> > > > What has that to do with the question I posed to Travis concerning
> > > > treaties?
>
> > > > On Jul 10, 3:04 pm, RICHARD BROWN <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > Did the President of the United States get a UN Resolution to use
> > > > > force, or did he get permission from the U.S. Congress to use force
> > > > > when we invaded Kosovo?  Did we have an exit strategy?  Do we plan on
> > > > > letting them become self-governing?
>
> > > > > On Jul 7, 9:26 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Travis,
>
> > > > > > Tell us how many times this has happened in our entire history.
>
> > > > > > On Jul 7, 11:22 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Dick:  Do you know how many senators it actually takes to approve 
> > > > > > > a treaty?
>
> > > > > > > Didn't think so.  Try TWO (2).
>
> > > > > > > That is all.  One (1) to preside over the senate and one (1) to 
> > > > > > > vote yes.
>
> > > > > > > That one (1) vote YES is two-thirds (2/3)  of the senators 
> > > > > > > present (1) and
> > > > > > > voting (again 1).
>
> > > > > > > This was a grave mistake the founding fathers made when they did 
> > > > > > > not make
> > > > > > > the vote a required two-thirds (2/3) of the senate.
>
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:14 AM, dick thompson 
> > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Sounds right to me.  I don't see where the president can just 
> > > > > > > > make the
> > > > > > > > treaty without the consent of the US Senate.  If I remember 
> > > > > > > > right it takes
> > > > > > > > both of them to approve the treaties.  It is not really a done 
> > > > > > > > deal if the
> > > > > > > > president signs it unless the senate also approves it.  Guess 
> > > > > > > > they forgot
> > > > > > > > that one.  Of course they also tried to forget that when it 
> > > > > > > > came to Kyoto
> > > > > > > > for a while as the Dems tried to force the US to implement a 
> > > > > > > > treaty that the
> > > > > > > > Senate never ratified.  Looks like another one coming along.
>
> > > > > > > > *The Constitution Imposes Severe Limits On A President's 
> > > > > > > > Treaty-Making
> > > > > > > > Powers:  * Here's the relevant 
> > > > > > > > section<http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_Am...>:
>
> > > > > > > > He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the 
> > > > > > > > Senate, to
> > > > > > > > make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present 
> > > > > > > > concur;
>
> > > > > > > > The Obama administration is finding that limitation 
> > > > > > > > inconvenient<http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/05/obama-hey-lets-bypass-the-senat...>,
> > > > > > > > and so they are thinking of "temporarily 
> > > > > > > > bypassing"<http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/07/us-russian-arms-negot...>the
> > > > > > > >  Senate.   Not on any important matter, just a little agreement 
> > > > > > > > with the
> > > > > > > > Russians on limiting nuclear arms.
>
> > > > > > > > I looked carefully through the Constitution, and could not find 
> > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > provision that allows a president to bypass, temporarily or 
> > > > > > > > otherwise, that
> > > > > > > > limit on his treaty-making powers.
>
> > > > > > > > Senator Byrd — among others — isn't going to like this one 
> > > > > > > > little bit.
> > > > > > > > - 8:08 AM, 6 July 2009   
> > > > > > > > [link]<http://www.seanet.com/~jimxc/Politics/July2009_1.html#jrm7578>
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage 
> limits.http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_...-
>  Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to