KIT, Why are you telling me this? What do I care who "Sugarshack" hates or does not and his reasons? Talk to him, not me. Is he the only person that has posted here over the past two years or so? Whio are YOU to define what was/is a side-show issue?
On Aug 2, 1:34 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Holly, > > To date, Sugarshack has no clue as to why he hates Bush.... > > Most socialists detested Bush because, "He stole the election"; or "Bush > Lied", neither allegation being true.....There are so many examples of > stupid crap that the far left slung at President Bush that had not > substance, and rarely if ever were they critical of the things that > conservatives were critical of, you included. Come to think of it, I have > never seen you ever complain about any of the issues that most conservatives > were focused upon or outraged about. Instead, you were always on some side > show issue, or bashing Palin. > > Wanna start pulling up old posts from the last couple of years??? > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM, dick thompson <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > If you had bothered to read any of the media that is not bought and paid > > for by the DNC you would have realized that the conservative Republicans > > complained loud and long over a lot of the Bush policies. If you also > > bothered to read the votes for the policies, you would find that a lot of > > the Democrats voted for them to the point that the conservative votes would > > not matter. But of course you would not do that. You would rather point > > fingers and say they did it first!! They didn't but if it blows your skirt > > up lie all you want. You are only fooling yourself. > > > Hollywood wrote: > > > dick, > > > Try reading posts made here over the past two years or so. Now, would > > you care to explain the "logic" of KIT's post to me. > > > On Aug 2, 11:33 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > When did what they said they were outraged over made any sense? > > Especially since now they think the same policies are just peachy keen > > when Zero uses them. > > > Hollywood wrote: > > > KIT, > > > Wait a minute here. What you are basically saying is that > > conservatives were outraged over many of Bush's policies same as > > liberals and/or Democrats BUT conservatives were outraged for the > > "right" reasons and Liberal and/or Democrats were NOT??? When the hell > > did Democrats and/or liberal NOT say WHY they were outraged? > > > Do you realize how illogical that is? > > > On Aug 2, 11:18 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Richard, > > > Geez......I am a bit surprised at this latest response by you. > > Republicans, > > (I should say, "conservatives in the Republican Party") were not concerned > > when Bush was not fiscally responsible? Conservatives were not outraged > > when President Bush created the "Homeland Security" by merging several > > bloated and broken federal bureauacracies? Conservatives did not feel > > betrayed when President Bush asked all Americans to forego a number of their > > unalienable rights in the name of security, but then failed to secure our > > borders? > > > With all due respect, you Sir, either have a selective memory, or what > > you really meant to say, was that "Conservative Republicans actually knew, > > understood, and comprehended why they were upset and outraged with the Bush > > Administration, versus far left extremist socialist-elitist wacko > > Moonbats such as Sugarshack Virtual-Truth, Studio and Holly, who, 'Hated > > Bush, But Didn't Know Why' ". > > > The outrage showed during last year's election, and two years previous > > to > > last year's election. The reason that there is such a clusterfuck in > > Washington, is because the conservatives didn't come out to support another > > moderate/liberal Republican candidate. This will change next year in the > > Congress, and mark Obama as another Jimmy Carter one term, "Bad > > Experiment". > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:25 PM, RICHARD BROWN > > <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Keith, > > Yes I am referring to Kosovo. > > > Hollywood, > > I was simply pointing out that when people become partisan, they will > > look the other way when their guy/gal does something they would > > otherwise raise hell about. I was using the bombing of Kosovo as a > > glaring example of how the left for the most part was silent until the > > bombing was almost over with before a few of them protested. > > So it is with creating the largest new federal agency in history. > > Since Bush did it, the Republicans were not concerned about it. If a > > Democratic president had pushed for it they would have screamed like > > banshees. > > I hope that explains it. I rarely answer a particular post but chime > > in on the thread with my own point of view. If I am answering your > > post, I address you as I have done so here. But thanks for asking. > > Richard > > > On Aug 1, 10:56 am, sILVER bELLE <[email protected]> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My mutter (She does) has such a selective memory. Its VERY FRUSTRATING > > > to those of us who KNOW we are right. > > > sILVER bELLE who lives in Hell (Assisted living) > > > sILVER bELLE > > > Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:34:31 -0700 > > Subject: Re: Obama passing new law to allow searching of PC's, Laptops, > > > and media devices > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > In Transactional Analysis there are three ways of communicating, > > namely Adult, Parent or Child. The passing of information is Adult- > > Adult. The passing of insults is Child-Child. I have taken the > > previous posts by two of our members and removed the Child-Child > > parts. What do you think of the results? I would like to hear from > > Hollywood and Bruce on this too. I appreciate your posts when they > > are Adult-Adult. > > > (Hollywood) > > Bruce, Are you saying that when it was done under the Bush > > administration it was completely illegal? That's funny, I don't > > remember conservative Republicans OR Libertarians screaming bloody > > murder over it. > > > (Bruce) > > Yes but your memory may be selective. > > Ron Paul rallies, to take just one example, had thousands of people > > arguing against Bush and the Patriot Act. > > Janeane Garafalo said the tea party people didn't hold protest rallies > > when the President was white. Though they > > did at Ron Paul rallies among others > > Obama is going farther into fascism than Bush. His new websitecars.gov for > > learning about "cash for clunkers"contains a disclosure > > that if you access the website your computer and all its files then > > belong to the federal government as soon as you log on > > > (Hollywood) > > Bruce, > > Well, I guess they did not yell loud enough, did they? Ron Paul did > > not get the nomination, did he? > > Oh, so you agree that Bush was a fascist. > > > (Bruce) > > You claimed no libertarian complained about Bush's violations of civil > > liberties, which you may have done to avoid the topic of Obama's more > > extensive violations of civil liberties. When this is pointed out to > > you, you say that the libertarians didn't win the election > > > (Hollywood) > > Bruce, > > No, I said "I don't remember conservative Republicans OR Libertarians, > > etc. etc" Did NOT say NONE did. > > > (Bruce) > > Are you back pedaling? > > > (Hollywood) > > bruce, > > Feel free to point our any falsehoods in my post. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for > > > Hotmail®.http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/personalize.aspx?ocid=PI...quoted > > text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
