KIT, Wait a minute here. What you are basically saying is that conservatives were outraged over many of Bush's policies same as liberals and/or Democrats BUT conservatives were outraged for the "right" reasons and Liberal and/or Democrats were NOT??? When the hell did Democrats and/or liberal NOT say WHY they were outraged?
Do you realize how illogical that is? On Aug 2, 11:18 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Richard, > > Geez......I am a bit surprised at this latest response by you. Republicans, > (I should say, "conservatives in the Republican Party") were not concerned > when Bush was not fiscally responsible? Conservatives were not outraged > when President Bush created the "Homeland Security" by merging several > bloated and broken federal bureauacracies? Conservatives did not feel > betrayed when President Bush asked all Americans to forego a number of their > unalienable rights in the name of security, but then failed to secure our > borders? > > With all due respect, you Sir, either have a selective memory, or what > you really meant to say, was that "Conservative Republicans actually knew, > understood, and comprehended why they were upset and outraged with the Bush > Administration, versus far left extremist socialist-elitist wacko > Moonbats such as Sugarshack Virtual-Truth, Studio and Holly, who, 'Hated > Bush, But Didn't Know Why' ". > > The outrage showed during last year's election, and two years previous to > last year's election. The reason that there is such a clusterfuck in > Washington, is because the conservatives didn't come out to support another > moderate/liberal Republican candidate. This will change next year in the > Congress, and mark Obama as another Jimmy Carter one term, "Bad > Experiment". > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:25 PM, RICHARD BROWN <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > Keith, > > Yes I am referring to Kosovo. > > > Hollywood, > > I was simply pointing out that when people become partisan, they will > > look the other way when their guy/gal does something they would > > otherwise raise hell about. I was using the bombing of Kosovo as a > > glaring example of how the left for the most part was silent until the > > bombing was almost over with before a few of them protested. > > So it is with creating the largest new federal agency in history. > > Since Bush did it, the Republicans were not concerned about it. If a > > Democratic president had pushed for it they would have screamed like > > banshees. > > I hope that explains it. I rarely answer a particular post but chime > > in on the thread with my own point of view. If I am answering your > > post, I address you as I have done so here. But thanks for asking. > > Richard > > > On Aug 1, 10:56 am, sILVER bELLE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My mutter (She does) has such a selective memory. Its VERY FRUSTRATING > > to those of us who KNOW we are right. > > > > sILVER bELLE who lives in Hell (Assisted living) > > > > sILVER bELLE > > > > > Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:34:31 -0700 > > > > Subject: Re: Obama passing new law to allow searching of PC's, Laptops, > > and media devices > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > In Transactional Analysis there are three ways of communicating, > > > > namely Adult, Parent or Child. The passing of information is Adult- > > > > Adult. The passing of insults is Child-Child. I have taken the > > > > previous posts by two of our members and removed the Child-Child > > > > parts. What do you think of the results? I would like to hear from > > > > Hollywood and Bruce on this too. I appreciate your posts when they > > > > are Adult-Adult. > > > > > (Hollywood) > > > > Bruce, Are you saying that when it was done under the Bush > > > > administration it was completely illegal? That's funny, I don't > > > > remember conservative Republicans OR Libertarians screaming bloody > > > > murder over it. > > > > > (Bruce) > > > > Yes but your memory may be selective. > > > > Ron Paul rallies, to take just one example, had thousands of people > > > > arguing against Bush and the Patriot Act. > > > > Janeane Garafalo said the tea party people didn't hold protest rallies > > > > when the President was white. Though they > > > > did at Ron Paul rallies among others > > > > Obama is going farther into fascism than Bush. His new website > > > > cars.gov for learning about "cash for clunkers"contains a disclosure > > > > that if you access the website your computer and all its files then > > > > belong to the federal government as soon as you log on > > > > > (Hollywood) > > > > Bruce, > > > > Well, I guess they did not yell loud enough, did they? Ron Paul did > > > > not get the nomination, did he? > > > > Oh, so you agree that Bush was a fascist. > > > > > (Bruce) > > > > You claimed no libertarian complained about Bush's violations of civil > > > > liberties, which you may have done to avoid the topic of Obama's more > > > > extensive violations of civil liberties. When this is pointed out to > > > > you, you say that the libertarians didn't win the election > > > > > (Hollywood) > > > > Bruce, > > > > No, I said "I don't remember conservative Republicans OR Libertarians, > > > > etc. etc" Did NOT say NONE did. > > > > > (Bruce) > > > > Are you back pedaling? > > > > > (Hollywood) > > > > bruce, > > > > Feel free to point our any falsehoods in my post. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for > > Hotmail®. > >http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/personalize.aspx?ocid=PI...- > >Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
