dick,

Try reading posts made here over the past two years or so. Now, would
you care to explain the "logic" of KIT's post to me.

On Aug 2, 11:33 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> When did what they said they were outraged over made any sense?  
> Especially since now they think the same policies are just peachy keen
> when Zero uses them.
>
>
>
> Hollywood wrote:
> > KIT,
>
> > Wait a minute here. What you are basically saying is that
> > conservatives were outraged over many of Bush's policies same as
> > liberals and/or Democrats BUT conservatives were outraged for the
> > "right" reasons and Liberal and/or Democrats were NOT??? When the hell
> > did Democrats and/or liberal NOT say WHY they were outraged?
>
> > Do you realize how illogical that is?
>
> > On Aug 2, 11:18 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Richard,
>
> >> Geez......I am a bit surprised at this latest response by you.  
> >> Republicans,
> >> (I should say, "conservatives in the Republican Party") were not concerned
> >> when Bush was not fiscally responsible?  Conservatives were not outraged
> >> when President Bush created the "Homeland Security" by merging several
> >> bloated and broken federal bureauacracies?   Conservatives did not feel
> >> betrayed when President Bush asked all Americans to forego a number of 
> >> their
> >> unalienable rights in the name of security, but then failed to secure our
> >> borders?
>
> >> With all due respect, you Sir, either have a selective memory, or what
> >> you really meant to say, was that "Conservative Republicans actually knew,
> >> understood, and comprehended why they were upset and outraged with the Bush
> >> Administration, versus far left extremist socialist-elitist wacko
> >> Moonbats such as Sugarshack Virtual-Truth, Studio and Holly, who, 'Hated
> >> Bush, But Didn't Know Why' ".
>
> >>    The outrage showed during last year's election, and two years previous 
> >> to
> >> last year's election.  The reason that there is such a clusterfuck in
> >> Washington, is because the conservatives didn't come out to support another
> >> moderate/liberal Republican candidate.  This will change next year in the
> >> Congress, and mark Obama as another Jimmy Carter one term, "Bad
> >> Experiment".
>
> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:25 PM, RICHARD BROWN 
> >> <[email protected]
>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>> Keith,
> >>> Yes I am referring to Kosovo.
>
> >>> Hollywood,
> >>> I was simply pointing out that when people become partisan, they will
> >>> look the other way when their guy/gal does something they would
> >>> otherwise raise hell about.  I was using the bombing of Kosovo as a
> >>> glaring example of how the left for the most part was silent until the
> >>> bombing was almost over with before a few of them protested.
> >>> So it is with creating the largest new federal agency in history.
> >>> Since Bush did it, the Republicans were not concerned about it.  If a
> >>> Democratic president had pushed for it they would have screamed like
> >>> banshees.
> >>> I hope that explains it.  I rarely answer a particular post but chime
> >>> in on the thread with my own point of view.  If I am answering your
> >>> post, I address you as I have done so here.  But thanks for asking.
> >>> Richard
>
> >>> On Aug 1, 10:56 am, sILVER bELLE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>> My mutter (She does) has such a selective memory.  Its VERY FRUSTRATING
>
> >>> to those of us who KNOW we are right.
>
> >>>> sILVER bELLE who lives in Hell (Assisted living)
>
> >>>>  sILVER bELLE
>
> >>>>> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:34:31 -0700
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Obama passing new law to allow searching of PC's, Laptops,
>
> >>> and  media devices
>
> >>>>> From: [email protected]
>
> >>>  > > To: [email protected]
>
> >>>>> In Transactional Analysis there are three ways of communicating,
> >>>>> namely Adult, Parent or Child.  The passing of information is Adult-
> >>>>> Adult.  The passing of insults is Child-Child. I have taken the
> >>>>> previous posts by two of our members and removed the Child-Child
> >>>>> parts.  What do you think of the results?  I would like to hear from
> >>>>> Hollywood and Bruce on this too.  I appreciate your posts when they
> >>>>> are Adult-Adult.
>
> >>>>> (Hollywood)
> >>>>> Bruce, Are you saying that when it was done under the Bush
> >>>>> administration it was completely illegal? That's funny, I don't
> >>>>> remember conservative Republicans OR Libertarians screaming bloody
> >>>>> murder over it.
>
> >>>>> (Bruce)
> >>>>> Yes but your memory may be selective.
> >>>>> Ron Paul rallies, to take just one example, had thousands of people
> >>>>> arguing against Bush and the Patriot Act.
> >>>>> Janeane Garafalo said the tea party people didn't hold protest rallies
> >>>>> when the President was white. Though they
> >>>>> did at Ron Paul rallies among others
> >>>>> Obama is going farther into fascism than Bush. His new website
> >>>>> cars.gov for learning about "cash for clunkers"contains a disclosure
> >>>>> that if you access the website your computer and all its files then
> >>>>> belong to the federal government as soon as you log on
>
> >>>>> (Hollywood)
> >>>>> Bruce,
> >>>>> Well, I guess they did not yell loud enough, did they? Ron Paul did
> >>>>> not get the nomination, did he?
> >>>>> Oh, so you agree that Bush was a fascist.
>
> >>>>> (Bruce)
> >>>>> You claimed no libertarian complained about Bush's violations of civil
> >>>>> liberties, which you may have done to avoid the topic of Obama's more
> >>>>> extensive violations of civil liberties.  When this is pointed out to
> >>>>> you, you say that the libertarians didn't win the election
>
> >>>>> (Hollywood)
> >>>>> Bruce,
> >>>>> No, I said "I don't remember conservative Republicans OR Libertarians,
> >>>>> etc. etc" Did NOT say NONE did.
>
> >>>>> (Bruce)
> >>>>> Are you back pedaling?
>
> >>>>> (Hollywood)
> >>>>> bruce,
> >>>>> Feel free to point our any falsehoods in my post.
>
> >>>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for
>
> >>> Hotmail®.
> >>>http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/personalize.aspx?ocid=PI...Hide
> >>> quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to