1) Under Bush, the DA in question refused to implement laws relating to voting, even though it is the DOJ's job to set the type of case priority....
2) Bush never set aside default judgement In short, Obama efforts in politicizing the DOJ and IG is far greater, and for a Party and their supporters who decried Bush refuse to decry Obama is clear proof that the ENTIRE issue was for political gain rather than principle... 3) Even out??? Nah, as I said Obama's action are greater in quantity and scope... Not unlike Nixon, whose actions were also greater in quantity and scope... Is Obama as corrupt as Nixon??? On Aug 1, 3:53 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > jgg, > > Anf your voice was silent when Bush did it. That seems to even out. > > On Aug 1, 10:11 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Democrats complained Bush did this, when in fact when Holder and Obama > > ARE do it, their voice is silent... > > >http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/799... > > > - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
