jgg, Oh? And the auto dealers and manufacturers in no way benefit? Know many poor people that own car dealerships or manufacturing plants or banks? A car dealer does not benefit by moving stock of his lot, which of course he is paying interest on? A car manufacturer does not benefit by selling more cars to it's dealers? Banks do not benefit by making more loans for cars? Who's being "bribed" here?
On Aug 4, 10:55 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > The leaders in general reflect their political base -- my side's > benefit is your side's example of corruption... Take cash for > clunkers... Now who benefits??? The real clunkers are owned by the > poor who can not afford a new car... Instead of saving a mere 4 mpg > per vehicle why not 15 mph??? Because it is designed as a bribe to > the Democratic base... The leaders are probably LESS corrupt than > their supporters on the whole -- the leaders only have more > opportunity to be corrupt... > > On Aug 3, 1:19 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > jgg, > > > You're starting to understand. ALMOST ALL of our political leaders are > > corrupt, both Republican and Democrat. We are simply arguing in favor > > of our favorite fucking crook. Like a discussion over which was the > > "better" bank robber, Clyde Barrow or John Dillinger. (yeah Dillinger > > was a bank robber BUT he killed fewer people than the Barrow gang) > > > On Aug 3, 11:58 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 1) Under Bush, the DA in question refused to implement laws relating > > > to voting, even though it is the DOJ's job to set the type of case > > > priority.... > > > > 2) Bush never set aside default judgement > > > > In short, Obama efforts in politicizing the DOJ and IG is far greater, > > > and for a Party and their supporters who decried Bush refuse to decry > > > Obama is clear proof that the ENTIRE issue was for political gain > > > rather than principle... > > > > 3) Even out??? Nah, as I said Obama's action are greater in quantity > > > and scope... Not unlike Nixon, whose actions were also greater in > > > quantity and scope... Is Obama as corrupt as Nixon??? > > > > On Aug 1, 3:53 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > jgg, > > > > > Anf your voice was silent when Bush did it. That seems to even out. > > > > > On Aug 1, 10:11 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Democrats complained Bush did this, when in fact when Holder and Obama > > > > > ARE do it, their voice is silent... > > > > > >http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/799... > > > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
