dick, You're just not listening.
On Aug 4, 5:30 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > Didn't need 15 months - just needed 6 months. > > > > Hollywood wrote: > > dick, > > > Some details: > > The "clunker" must have been licensed and insured by the person > > turning it in for a minimum of the preceding 12 months. > > It must be traded in for a car that gets better gas milage. > > It must be turned in for a new car. > > Do you think anyone saw this coming 13 months in advance? > > How does your post, even if 100% true, negate any of the things I said > > in my post? > > You want NO stimulus to our economy unless it can be proven to be > > permanent? > > > If the poor don't have the credit to buy new cars anyway, no matter > > the clunker program I repeat my question. Who is it the Democrats are > > "bribing"? > > > On Aug 4, 3:17 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> You evidently missed the point that people saw this cash for clunkers > >> coming and held up buying their new cars until the program started. > >> That way they got $4500 better cost for the car they were going to buy > >> anyway. And the rest of the people don't have the credit to get the > >> cars in the first place. Once you get the initial cash program then > >> there will be no more cars sold. Lose - lose. > > >> Hollywood wrote: > > >>> jgg, > > >>> Oh? And the auto dealers and manufacturers in no way benefit? Know > >>> many poor people that own car dealerships or manufacturing plants or > >>> banks? A car dealer does not benefit by moving stock of his lot, which > >>> of course he is paying interest on? > >>> A car manufacturer does not benefit by selling more cars to it's > >>> dealers? Banks do not benefit by making more loans for cars? > >>> Who's being "bribed" here? > > >>> On Aug 4, 10:55 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> The leaders in general reflect their political base -- my side's > >>>> benefit is your side's example of corruption... Take cash for > >>>> clunkers... Now who benefits??? The real clunkers are owned by the > >>>> poor who can not afford a new car... Instead of saving a mere 4 mpg > >>>> per vehicle why not 15 mph??? Because it is designed as a bribe to > >>>> the Democratic base... The leaders are probably LESS corrupt than > >>>> their supporters on the whole -- the leaders only have more > >>>> opportunity to be corrupt... > > >>>> On Aug 3, 1:19 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> jgg, > > >>>>> You're starting to understand. ALMOST ALL of our political leaders are > >>>>> corrupt, both Republican and Democrat. We are simply arguing in favor > >>>>> of our favorite fucking crook. Like a discussion over which was the > >>>>> "better" bank robber, Clyde Barrow or John Dillinger. (yeah Dillinger > >>>>> was a bank robber BUT he killed fewer people than the Barrow gang) > > >>>>> On Aug 3, 11:58 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> 1) Under Bush, the DA in question refused to implement laws relating > >>>>>> to voting, even though it is the DOJ's job to set the type of case > >>>>>> priority.... > > >>>>>> 2) Bush never set aside default judgement > > >>>>>> In short, Obama efforts in politicizing the DOJ and IG is far greater, > >>>>>> and for a Party and their supporters who decried Bush refuse to decry > >>>>>> Obama is clear proof that the ENTIRE issue was for political gain > >>>>>> rather than principle... > > >>>>>> 3) Even out??? Nah, as I said Obama's action are greater in quantity > >>>>>> and scope... Not unlike Nixon, whose actions were also greater in > >>>>>> quantity and scope... Is Obama as corrupt as Nixon??? > > >>>>>> On Aug 1, 3:53 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> jgg, > > >>>>>>> Anf your voice was silent when Bush did it. That seems to even out. > > >>>>>>> On Aug 1, 10:11 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> Democrats complained Bush did this, when in fact when Holder and > >>>>>>>> Obama > >>>>>>>> ARE do it, their voice is silent... > > >>>>>>>>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/799... > > >>>>>>>> - Hide quoted text - > > >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
