Sage2,

Wrong.

On Oct 22, 4:33 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote:
>                 It could be Obama is not nti-American!?  He is however
> pro-socialist which makes him anti-American.
>
> ***************************************************************************­**********************************************
>
> On Oct 21, 4:49 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >  « Obama and Ahmadinejad — the Love
> > Song<http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/obama-and-ahmadinehad-the-love...>
>
> > The gay agenda <http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/the-gay-agenda/> »
>
> > Is Barack Obama anti-American?
> > *UPDATED*<http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/is-barack-obama-anti-american/>
>
> > Bookworm <http://www.bookwormroom.com/author/bookworm/> on Oct 18 2009 at
> > 12:48 pm | Filed under:
> > Anti-Americanism<http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/anti-americanism/>,
> > Barack Obama <http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/barack-obama/>,
> > Freedom<http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/freedom/>
>
> > 23 <http://tweetmeme.com/story/219069223/>
>
> > tweets <http://tweetmeme.com/story/219069223/>
>
> > retweet
>
> > A couple of weeks ago, I included in a post the statement that Barack Obama
> > is anti-American.  A dear and respected friend suggested that I was
> > exaggerating.  Obama may have a different vision of or goal for America, he
> > said, but that’s scarcely the same as being anti-American.  I’ve been
> > thinking that over for a while and, after a lot of mental give and take
> > about what it means to be “anti-” anything, have now decided that Barack
> > Obama is indeed anti-American.
>
> > Everything has a fundamental essence, a quality that makes it uniquely
> > itself.  Take an orange, for example.  It’s not only citrus fruit, *it’s an
> > orange colored *citrus fruit.  Horticulturists can alter its size, its
> > texture, it’s sweetness, and the purity of its orange color, but it still
> > remains an orange because that color is its definition.  Change the color,
> > however, and suddenly, you have the un-orange, the anti-orange.  You have
> > something completely different that no longer contains within it the essence
> > of the original fruit.  Lose the essence and you lose the orange.
>
> > America has an essence too, and that essence is liberty.  America since its
> > inception has been defined by liberty, both the liberty of the individual
> > and the liberty of the nation.  Individual liberty means that Americans
> > should be subject to minimal government constraints.  The state exists to
> > serve the individual (commerce, transportation, security), not to control
> > the individual.  That’s why the Bill of Rights focuses so closely on
> > individual freedoms:  the freedom to speak, the freedom to write, the
> > freedom to worship, the freedom to defend oneself with arms, the freedom
> > from searches and seizures, etc.  Liberty also extends to the nation.  Both
> > the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are replete with
> > examples of the Founders’ absolute obsession with national sovereignty.
> > Just recently, we’ve been reminded of the fact that the Founders didn’t even
> > want the appearance of impropriety and the risk of influence, since they
> > specifically prohibited foreign emoluments for our presidents.
>
> > Despite blunders of enormous magnitude (slavery, the treatment of Native
> > Americans, and the imprisonment of American Japanese), Americans have, for
> > the most part, taken these freedoms with the utmost seriousness.  We are a
> > nation “of the people, by the people and for the people.”  We have not
> > allowed ourselves to be ruled by tyrannies, dictators or bureaucracies.  We
> > like our taxes low and our freedoms high.  In the past 100 years, when we
> > fight wars, we do not fight wars to conquer other people, we fight wars to
> > free other people from tyrannies.  Those on the Left who sneer at our
> > “imperialist ventures” implicitly side with Hitler, with the North Koreans,
> > with the Communist North Vietnamese, and with Saddam Hussein (mass murderer
> > of his own people).  While ordinary Americans shed blood so that others on
> > foreign shores can live free, the Left cheers on those who would deny their
> > own citizens (or the citizens of conquered nations) the same freedoms we
> > unthinkingly enjoy.
>
> > All the freedoms I’ve discussed can very quickly be distilled into a single
> > essence, *an American essence*:  American individuals are free from control
> > by and fear of their own government, and the American nation is free from
> > control by other nations.
>
> > Barack Obama is anti-American because he wants to change this American
> > essence.  His domestic policy is directed at increasing government control
> > in every area, which decreases individual liberty.  Here’s an incomplete
> > bullet-point list of his anti-liberty goals on the home front:
>
> >    - He wants to remove any last vestiges of the marketplace from
> >    individuals’ control over their own health care, and put the government
> >    entirely in charge.
> >    - He’s willing to give government control over American businesses (i.e.,
> >    Bank takeover ands Government Motors).
> >    - His administration, while on record as opposing the Fairness Doctrine,
> >    is aggressively exploring a backdoor regulatory
> > scheme<http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1484968/obama_and_the_fairne...>that
> > would have precisely the same practical effect as the Fairness
> >    Doctrine:  it would impose government restrictions on content, rather 
> > than
> >    allowing the market (that means us, the consumers) to control content.
> >    - His FCC wants to control the
> > internet<http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/new_fcc_chairman_targets_inter...>,
> >    which is a humming beehive of free speech, much of it critical of Obama.
> >    - Although he’s mostly erased the record, his dream is to create a
> >    civilian national security
> > force<http://forthardknox.com/2008/07/16/say-what-a-400b-national-security-...>,
> >    subordinate to the administration, which would be larger than the 
> > American
> >    military.  The military, please note, is controlled by the Constitution 
> > and
> >    has traditionally existed as a separate entity from any government.
> >    - He wants to take away the right to bear arms.  He’ll pay lip service to
> >    supporting the Second Amendment, but his fundamental goal is to use
> >    government to remove arms from
> > individuals<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/06/AR200...>.
> >    I’ve never held a gun in my life, but I know that the Founders understood
> >    that, for individuals, their single biggest defense against an 
> > overreaching
> >    government, is the right to arm themselves.  Statists never allow their
> >    citizens to bear arms.  Indeed, the first thing the Nazis did was ban 
> > guns
> >    in citizen’s hands.
> >    - He wants to redistribute
> > wealth<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRPbCSSXyp0>.
> >    Without money, people have no choices.  The more money the government
> >    siphons to itself, the fewer choices we, as individuals have, which 
> > makes us
> >    increasingly subordinate to the government.
>
> > Of course, not all these Obama dreams will become reality.  As I noted
> > above, Obama has been trying to delete evidence that he ever dreamt about a
> > huge civilian security force at his beck and call.  And with other dreams
> > (for example, the Second Amendment) he’s doing a fancy dance by which he
> > tries to hide his authoritarian impulses.  But it doesn’t matter.  This post
> > isn’t about what Obama will actually do.  It’s about what he wants to do,
> > what his desires are *vis a vis* the American people — and it’s very clear
> > that his desire is antithetical to the American essence.  He wants to limit
> > or destroy individual liberties.
>
> > Politically, too, Obama’s impulses are all antithetical to liberty.  Again,
> > some examples:
>
> >    - He has turned against the only democratic nation in the Middle East
> >    (that would be Israel), in favor of the bloodied tyrannical theocracies 
> > on
> >    her borders.
> >    - By reversing his pledge to keep a missile defense system in place in
> >    Poland and the Czech Republic, he has favored Iran’s Muslim tyranny over
> >    these democratic nations only so recently freed from Communism.
> >    - Figuratively and literally, he bows to dictators (Saudis, Venezuelans,
> >    Russians, Iranians, Cubans).  They ask, he gives.  In other words, 
> > contrary
> >    to America’s hundred year history of siding with the people against their
> >    tyrants, he sides with the tyrants against their people.
> >    - In Honduras, he sided with the delusional Zelaya against the people and
> >    the Constitution.
> >    - In Iran, when the people took to the streets, he sided with the
> >    megalomaniac theocracy, against the people.
> >    - In his much-heralded speech to the Muslim world, in addition to
> >    grounding Israel’s right to exist solely on a Holocaust the Muslim world
> >    denies, he repeatedly and noisily
> > trumpeted<http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/09/01/obama-again-celebrates-putting...>the
> > right of Muslim men to control Muslim women, a
> >    trope he 
> > reiterated<http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/09/01/obama-again-celebrates-putting...>in
> > subsequent speeches.  This goes beyond the idiocy of multiculturalism
> > and
> >    actively supports the subordination of an eighth of the world’s 
> > population.
> >    (If 1/4 of the world is Muslim, and half of those Muslims are women….)
> >    - In his speeches, he assures the tyrannies of the world that America is
> >    abandoning her century old role of America’s policeman.  They are freed 
> > from
> >    any constraint.
> >    - By joining the farce that is the U.N. Human Rights Council, he is
> >    lending America’s imprimatur to
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to