Plain, As a chickenshit civilian I realize you never took the oath I did when I joined the Marine Corps. You can Google it and see how accurate I am if you wish. It's the same oath ALL military people take and very similar to the one AA elected officials take. It goes something like this:" I swear to preserve and protect the Constituion of the United Staes from all enemies both domestic and foreign and to obey the orders (legal orders) or the NCO's and officers appointed over me"
NOW dumbass. Tell me where I swore to protect a particular ECONOMIC SYSTEM, a particular ideaology, a particular religion, a particular political party, or any individual. TELL me where the U.S. Constituion requires the U.S. to follow a certain economic system? Trumped? My dying ass chickenshit BOB. On Oct 23, 10:18 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > you really ARE a traitor to the U.S. Constituion. > --- > no, you are by helping socialists take control of our nation > > Fucking hypocritical > traitor. > --- > fuck you and your dead mother, socialist warmonger > > as you can see, your insults will always be trumped, old man > > On Oct 23, 9:57 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Plain, > > > OH, so you really ARE a traitor to the U.S. Constituion. Freedom just > > fine you say, just so as the voting so your way. Fucking hypocritical > > traitor. > > > On Oct 22, 10:40 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > How about coming up with > > > BETTER ideas and winning at the voting booth? > > > --- > > > no > > > > the USA is not a democracy > > > we cannot leave allow the socialists to "purchase" our nation > > > > On Oct 22, 9:31 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Plain, > > > > > Here's a crazy idea BOB (Buckets Of Blood). How about coming up with > > > > BETTER ideas and winning at the voting booth? > > > > > On Oct 22, 7:39 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Barack Obama is anti-American because he wants to change this > > > > > American > > > > > essence. His domestic policy is directed at increasing government > > > > > control > > > > > in every area, which decreases individual liberty > > > > > --- > > > > > spot on! > > > > > > it just may take buckets of blood to remove these socialists from our > > > > > nation > > > > > > On Oct 21, 3:49 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > « Obama and Ahmadinejad — the Love > > > > > > Song<http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/obama-and-ahmadinehad-the-love...> > > > > > > > The gay agenda > > > > > > <http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/the-gay-agenda/> » > > > > > > > Is Barack Obama anti-American? > > > > > > *UPDATED*<http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/is-barack-obama-anti-american/> > > > > > > > Bookworm <http://www.bookwormroom.com/author/bookworm/> on Oct 18 > > > > > > 2009 at > > > > > > 12:48 pm | Filed under: > > > > > > Anti-Americanism<http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/anti-americanism/>, > > > > > > Barack Obama <http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/barack-obama/>, > > > > > > Freedom<http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/freedom/> > > > > > > > 23 <http://tweetmeme.com/story/219069223/> > > > > > > > tweets <http://tweetmeme.com/story/219069223/> > > > > > > > retweet > > > > > > > A couple of weeks ago, I included in a post the statement that > > > > > > Barack Obama > > > > > > is anti-American. A dear and respected friend suggested that I was > > > > > > exaggerating. Obama may have a different vision of or goal for > > > > > > America, he > > > > > > said, but that’s scarcely the same as being anti-American. I’ve > > > > > > been > > > > > > thinking that over for a while and, after a lot of mental give and > > > > > > take > > > > > > about what it means to be “anti-” anything, have now decided that > > > > > > Barack > > > > > > Obama is indeed anti-American. > > > > > > > Everything has a fundamental essence, a quality that makes it > > > > > > uniquely > > > > > > itself. Take an orange, for example. It’s not only citrus fruit, > > > > > > *it’s an > > > > > > orange colored *citrus fruit. Horticulturists can alter its size, > > > > > > its > > > > > > texture, it’s sweetness, and the purity of its orange color, but it > > > > > > still > > > > > > remains an orange because that color is its definition. Change the > > > > > > color, > > > > > > however, and suddenly, you have the un-orange, the anti-orange. > > > > > > You have > > > > > > something completely different that no longer contains within it > > > > > > the essence > > > > > > of the original fruit. Lose the essence and you lose the orange. > > > > > > > America has an essence too, and that essence is liberty. America > > > > > > since its > > > > > > inception has been defined by liberty, both the liberty of the > > > > > > individual > > > > > > and the liberty of the nation. Individual liberty means that > > > > > > Americans > > > > > > should be subject to minimal government constraints. The state > > > > > > exists to > > > > > > serve the individual (commerce, transportation, security), not to > > > > > > control > > > > > > the individual. That’s why the Bill of Rights focuses so closely on > > > > > > individual freedoms: the freedom to speak, the freedom to write, > > > > > > the > > > > > > freedom to worship, the freedom to defend oneself with arms, the > > > > > > freedom > > > > > > from searches and seizures, etc. Liberty also extends to the > > > > > > nation. Both > > > > > > the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are replete > > > > > > with > > > > > > examples of the Founders’ absolute obsession with national > > > > > > sovereignty. > > > > > > Just recently, we’ve been reminded of the fact that the Founders > > > > > > didn’t even > > > > > > want the appearance of impropriety and the risk of influence, since > > > > > > they > > > > > > specifically prohibited foreign emoluments for our presidents. > > > > > > > Despite blunders of enormous magnitude (slavery, the treatment of > > > > > > Native > > > > > > Americans, and the imprisonment of American Japanese), Americans > > > > > > have, for > > > > > > the most part, taken these freedoms with the utmost seriousness. > > > > > > We are a > > > > > > nation “of the people, by the people and for the people.” We have > > > > > > not > > > > > > allowed ourselves to be ruled by tyrannies, dictators or > > > > > > bureaucracies. We > > > > > > like our taxes low and our freedoms high. In the past 100 years, > > > > > > when we > > > > > > fight wars, we do not fight wars to conquer other people, we fight > > > > > > wars to > > > > > > free other people from tyrannies. Those on the Left who sneer at > > > > > > our > > > > > > “imperialist ventures” implicitly side with Hitler, with the North > > > > > > Koreans, > > > > > > with the Communist North Vietnamese, and with Saddam Hussein (mass > > > > > > murderer > > > > > > of his own people). While ordinary Americans shed blood so that > > > > > > others on > > > > > > foreign shores can live free, the Left cheers on those who would > > > > > > deny their > > > > > > own citizens (or the citizens of conquered nations) the same > > > > > > freedoms we > > > > > > unthinkingly enjoy. > > > > > > > All the freedoms I’ve discussed can very quickly be distilled into > > > > > > a single > > > > > > essence, *an American essence*: American individuals are free from > > > > > > control > > > > > > by and fear of their own government, and the American nation is > > > > > > free from > > > > > > control by other nations. > > > > > > > Barack Obama is anti-American because he wants to change this > > > > > > American > > > > > > essence. His domestic policy is directed at increasing government > > > > > > control > > > > > > in every area, which decreases individual liberty. Here’s an > > > > > > incomplete > > > > > > bullet-point list of his anti-liberty goals on the home front: > > > > > > > - He wants to remove any last vestiges of the marketplace from > > > > > > individuals’ control over their own health care, and put the > > > > > > government > > > > > > entirely in charge. > > > > > > - He’s willing to give government control over American > > > > > > businesses (i.e., > > > > > > Bank takeover ands Government Motors). > > > > > > - His administration, while on record as opposing the Fairness > > > > > > Doctrine, > > > > > > is aggressively exploring a backdoor regulatory > > > > > > scheme<http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1484968/obama_and_the_fairne...>that > > > > > > would have precisely the same practical effect as the Fairness > > > > > > Doctrine: it would impose government restrictions on content, > > > > > > rather than > > > > > > allowing the market (that means us, the consumers) to control > > > > > > content. > > > > > > - His FCC wants to control the > > > > > > internet<http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/new_fcc_chairman_targets_inter...>, > > > > > > which is a humming beehive of free speech, much of it critical > > > > > > of Obama. > > > > > > - Although he’s mostly erased the record, his dream is to create > > > > > > a > > > > > > civilian national security > > > > > > force<http://forthardknox.com/2008/07/16/say-what-a-400b-national-security-...>, > > > > > > subordinate to the administration, which would be larger than > > > > > > the American > > > > > > military. The military, please note, is controlled by the > > > > > > Constitution and > > > > > > has traditionally existed as a separate entity from any > > > > > > government. > > > > > > - He wants to take away the right to bear arms. He’ll pay lip > > > > > > service to > > > > > > supporting the Second Amendment, but his fundamental goal is to > > > > > > use > > > > > > government to remove arms from > > > > > > individuals<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/06/AR200...>. > > > > > > I’ve never held a gun in my life, but I know that the Founders > > > > > > understood > > > > > > that, for individuals, their single biggest defense against an > > > > > > overreaching > > > > > > government, is the right to arm themselves. Statists never > > > > > > allow their > > > > > > citizens to bear arms. Indeed, the first thing the Nazis did > > > > > > was ban guns > > > > > > in citizen’s hands. > > > > > > - He wants to redistribute > > > > > > wealth<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRPbCSSXyp0>. > > > > > > Without money, people have no choices. The more money the > > > > > > government > > > > > > siphons to itself, the fewer choices we, as individuals have, > > > > > > which makes us > > > > > > increasingly subordinate to the government. > > > > > > > Of course, not all these Obama dreams will become reality. As I > > > > > > noted > > > > > > above, Obama has been trying to delete evidence that he ever dreamt > > > > > > about a > > > > > > huge civilian security force at his beck and call. And with other > > > > > > dreams > > > > > > (for example, the Second Amendment) he’s doing a fancy dance by > > > > > > which he > > > > > > tries to hide his authoritarian impulses. But it doesn’t matter. > > > > > > This post > > > > > > isn’t about what Obama will actually do. It’s about what he wants > > > > > > to do, > > > > > > what his desires are *vis a vis* the American people — and it’s > > > > > > very clear > > > > > > that his desire is antithetical to the American essence. He wants > > > > > > to limit > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
