Plain, My mind works just fine. In the nuclear age we are ALL at least potential "war fodder". BTW, the correct term is "cannon fodder".
Why do you assume it was "blind"? EVERYONE fights for the lies of some politicians somewhere. The people that have to do the fighting rarely, if ever, are given the authority/ right to decide who, when, why and where to fight Then why the fuck do you lads scream SOCIALISM at Obama's economic decisions/policies On Oct 23, 4:05 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > As a chickenshit civilian I realize you never took the oath I did > when > I joined the Marine Corps. > --- > yeah, you were nothing but a mindless turned into war fodder > > You can Google it and see how accurate I am > if you wish. It's the same oath ALL military people take and very > similar to the one AA elected officials take. > --- > blind allegiance is foolish > > It goes something like this:" I swear to preserve and protect the > Constituion of the United Staes from all enemies both domestic and > foreign > --- > the gooks in VN never attacked the USA - you were fighting for the > lies of politicians > > and to obey the orders (legal orders) or the NCO's and > officers appointed over me" > --- > a mindless warmonger > > NOW dumbass. > --- > what, dickhead? > > Tell me where I swore to protect a particular ECONOMIC > SYSTEM, a particular ideaology, a particular religion, a particular > political party, or any individual. > --- > you joined giving them the right to send you into a suicide mission > only warmongers and religious nuts allow themselves to be sacrificed > > TELL me where the U.S. Constituion requires the U.S. to follow a > certain economic system? > --- > socialism is not an economic system > did you ever go to school? > > Trumped? > --- > and trounced > > My dying ass chickenshit BOB. > --- > you wanna live forever? > > On Oct 23, 11:05 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Plain, > > > As a chickenshit civilian I realize you never took the oath I did when > > I joined the Marine Corps. You can Google it and see how accurate I am > > if you wish. It's the same oath ALL military people take and very > > similar to the one AA elected officials take. > > It goes something like this:" I swear to preserve and protect the > > Constituion of the United Staes from all enemies both domestic and > > foreign and to obey the orders (legal orders) or the NCO's and > > officers appointed over me" > > > NOW dumbass. Tell me where I swore to protect a particular ECONOMIC > > SYSTEM, a particular ideaology, a particular religion, a particular > > political party, or any individual. > > TELL me where the U.S. Constituion requires the U.S. to follow a > > certain economic system? > > > Trumped? My dying ass chickenshit BOB. > > > On Oct 23, 10:18 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > you really ARE a traitor to the U.S. Constituion. > > > --- > > > no, you are by helping socialists take control of our nation > > > > Fucking hypocritical > > > traitor. > > > --- > > > fuck you and your dead mother, socialist warmonger > > > > as you can see, your insults will always be trumped, old man > > > > On Oct 23, 9:57 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Plain, > > > > > OH, so you really ARE a traitor to the U.S. Constituion. Freedom just > > > > fine you say, just so as the voting so your way. Fucking hypocritical > > > > traitor. > > > > > On Oct 22, 10:40 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > How about coming up with > > > > > BETTER ideas and winning at the voting booth? > > > > > --- > > > > > no > > > > > > the USA is not a democracy > > > > > we cannot leave allow the socialists to "purchase" our nation > > > > > > On Oct 22, 9:31 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Plain, > > > > > > > Here's a crazy idea BOB (Buckets Of Blood). How about coming up > > > > > > with > > > > > > BETTER ideas and winning at the voting booth? > > > > > > > On Oct 22, 7:39 am, plainolamerican <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Barack Obama is anti-American because he wants to change this > > > > > > > American > > > > > > > essence. His domestic policy is directed at increasing government > > > > > > > control > > > > > > > in every area, which decreases individual liberty > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > spot on! > > > > > > > > it just may take buckets of blood to remove these socialists from > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > nation > > > > > > > > On Oct 21, 3:49 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > « Obama and Ahmadinejad — the Love > > > > > > > > Song<http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/obama-and-ahmadinehad-the-love...> > > > > > > > > > The gay agenda > > > > > > > > <http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/the-gay-agenda/> » > > > > > > > > > Is Barack Obama anti-American? > > > > > > > > *UPDATED*<http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/18/is-barack-obama-anti-american/> > > > > > > > > > Bookworm <http://www.bookwormroom.com/author/bookworm/> on Oct > > > > > > > > 18 2009 at > > > > > > > > 12:48 pm | Filed under: > > > > > > > > Anti-Americanism<http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/anti-americanism/>, > > > > > > > > Barack Obama > > > > > > > > <http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/barack-obama/>, > > > > > > > > Freedom<http://www.bookwormroom.com/category/freedom/> > > > > > > > > > 23 <http://tweetmeme.com/story/219069223/> > > > > > > > > > tweets <http://tweetmeme.com/story/219069223/> > > > > > > > > > retweet > > > > > > > > > A couple of weeks ago, I included in a post the statement that > > > > > > > > Barack Obama > > > > > > > > is anti-American. A dear and respected friend suggested that I > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > exaggerating. Obama may have a different vision of or goal for > > > > > > > > America, he > > > > > > > > said, but that’s scarcely the same as being anti-American. > > > > > > > > I’ve been > > > > > > > > thinking that over for a while and, after a lot of mental give > > > > > > > > and take > > > > > > > > about what it means to be “anti-” anything, have now decided > > > > > > > > that Barack > > > > > > > > Obama is indeed anti-American. > > > > > > > > > Everything has a fundamental essence, a quality that makes it > > > > > > > > uniquely > > > > > > > > itself. Take an orange, for example. It’s not only citrus > > > > > > > > fruit, *it’s an > > > > > > > > orange colored *citrus fruit. Horticulturists can alter its > > > > > > > > size, its > > > > > > > > texture, it’s sweetness, and the purity of its orange color, > > > > > > > > but it still > > > > > > > > remains an orange because that color is its definition. Change > > > > > > > > the color, > > > > > > > > however, and suddenly, you have the un-orange, the anti-orange. > > > > > > > > You have > > > > > > > > something completely different that no longer contains within > > > > > > > > it the essence > > > > > > > > of the original fruit. Lose the essence and you lose the > > > > > > > > orange. > > > > > > > > > America has an essence too, and that essence is liberty. > > > > > > > > America since its > > > > > > > > inception has been defined by liberty, both the liberty of the > > > > > > > > individual > > > > > > > > and the liberty of the nation. Individual liberty means that > > > > > > > > Americans > > > > > > > > should be subject to minimal government constraints. The state > > > > > > > > exists to > > > > > > > > serve the individual (commerce, transportation, security), not > > > > > > > > to control > > > > > > > > the individual. That’s why the Bill of Rights focuses so > > > > > > > > closely on > > > > > > > > individual freedoms: the freedom to speak, the freedom to > > > > > > > > write, the > > > > > > > > freedom to worship, the freedom to defend oneself with arms, > > > > > > > > the freedom > > > > > > > > from searches and seizures, etc. Liberty also extends to the > > > > > > > > nation. Both > > > > > > > > the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are > > > > > > > > replete with > > > > > > > > examples of the Founders’ absolute obsession with national > > > > > > > > sovereignty. > > > > > > > > Just recently, we’ve been reminded of the fact that the > > > > > > > > Founders didn’t even > > > > > > > > want the appearance of impropriety and the risk of influence, > > > > > > > > since they > > > > > > > > specifically prohibited foreign emoluments for our presidents. > > > > > > > > > Despite blunders of enormous magnitude (slavery, the treatment > > > > > > > > of Native > > > > > > > > Americans, and the imprisonment of American Japanese), > > > > > > > > Americans have, for > > > > > > > > the most part, taken these freedoms with the utmost > > > > > > > > seriousness. We are a > > > > > > > > nation “of the people, by the people and for the people.” We > > > > > > > > have not > > > > > > > > allowed ourselves to be ruled by tyrannies, dictators or > > > > > > > > bureaucracies. We > > > > > > > > like our taxes low and our freedoms high. In the past 100 > > > > > > > > years, when we > > > > > > > > fight wars, we do not fight wars to conquer other people, we > > > > > > > > fight wars to > > > > > > > > free other people from tyrannies. Those on the Left who sneer > > > > > > > > at our > > > > > > > > “imperialist ventures” implicitly side with Hitler, with the > > > > > > > > North Koreans, > > > > > > > > with the Communist North Vietnamese, and with Saddam Hussein > > > > > > > > (mass murderer > > > > > > > > of his own people). While ordinary Americans shed blood so > > > > > > > > that others on > > > > > > > > foreign shores can live free, the Left cheers on those who > > > > > > > > would deny their > > > > > > > > own citizens (or the citizens of conquered nations) the same > > > > > > > > freedoms we > > > > > > > > unthinkingly enjoy. > > > > > > > > > All the freedoms I’ve discussed can very quickly be distilled > > > > > > > > into a single > > > > > > > > essence, *an American essence*: American individuals are free > > > > > > > > from control > > > > > > > > by and fear of their own government, and the American nation is > > > > > > > > free from > > > > > > > > control by other nations. > > > > > > > > > Barack Obama is anti-American because he wants to change this > > > > > > > > American > > > > > > > > essence. His domestic policy is directed at increasing > > > > > > > > government control > > > > > > > > in every area, which decreases individual liberty. Here’s an > > > > > > > > incomplete > > > > > > > > bullet-point list of his anti-liberty goals on the home front: > > > > > > > > > - He wants to remove any last vestiges of the marketplace > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > individuals’ control over their own health care, and put the > > > > > > > > government > > > > > > > > entirely in charge. > > > > > > > > - He’s willing to give government control over American > > > > > > > > businesses (i.e., > > > > > > > > Bank takeover ands Government Motors). > > > > > > > > - His administration, while on record as opposing the > > > > > > > > Fairness Doctrine, > > > > > > > > is aggressively exploring a backdoor regulatory > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
