You could not be more wrong. ---- no - you're wrong Please show me ONE clause in the constitution that allows the FEDS to protect and place themselves and their interests (regardless of what they are) above that/those of the individual person or state. --- privacy is not guaranteed per se by the Constitution of the United States. The Supreme Court of the United States has found that other guarantees have "penumbras" that implicitly grant a right to privacy against government intrusion, for example in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965).
On Nov 9, 8:22 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > Plaino...... > > You could not be more wrong. The very existence of the federal > government is to assure the individual citizens' and state rights as > guaranteed by the constitution, NOT to diminish them in ANY way. > > No where in the constitution are "Federal rights" listed; only the > duties to protect mine, yours and those of the individual states. > > Please show me ONE clause in the constitution that allows the FEDS to > protect and place themselves and their interests (regardless of what > they are) above that/those of the individual person or state. > > On Nov 2, 10:49 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > sorry - natl security trumps personal privacy > > > On Nov 2, 4:35 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > quite an admission... Clearly he did not add "Bush was right all > > > along... > > > > Original court document > > > >http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/38-1%20MTD%20and%20MSJ%20Ex.1%20... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
