This is a silly piece that shows how little intelligence the author of the piece has
Beck is one of the few people on TV uncovering any news You are too stupid to understand that This group has a sad collection of moronic bitches in it On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:47 AM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > GLENN BECK’S SNOWBALLS ARE MELTING IN HELL. > > Beck is now back at work following surgery. Like before, he teases us > with the revelations of government corruption and shady dealings that > he will reveal on his next show. Mostly those relate to the Obama > White House, composed of radical thinkers who are unsatisfied with our > having a government with any semblance of the ideals of our founding > fathers—like giving every citizen fair and democratic control over > their individual destinies. Unless a person is a corruption junky, > we’ve probably already past our tolerance for hearing more… negativity > from Beck. > > Beck enjoys being in the spotlight, though he sometimes blushes that > he is. Comics mimic his “thinker” gestures and sideways glances at > the camera. He is a big celebrity and his shows have high ratings. > As he has done so often before, he manages to wow us with more and > more concise proofs that this country is going-down-the-tubes. > Usually, that’s because of Obama’s radical, liberal thinking, propped- > up by corrupt and anti-democracy rascals like Nancy Pelosi and Harry > Reid. When the American People don’t want the USA going into terminal > debt, and don’t want government controlling what sort of health care > we can have, the Democratic Party that is in power considers doing > just those things to be a mandate; i.e., if the American People want > one thing, then, the Democrats say ramrod through the exact opposite, > and do so before the holiday recess, to reduce the chances that the > voters might dissuade any of the liberal… poop orifices to abandon > Obama’s runaway, pilot-less cruise ship. Hasn’t ‘that’ movie already > been made? > > Those regularly tuning-in to Glenn Beck’s shows must get satisfied > feelings knowing that Beck, the ultimate detective, is on Obama’s > case. But it’s much too likely that those same viewers will expend > their individual frustrations that might otherwise have motivated them > into individual patriotic service. Instead of inspiring the needed > participation of every American who watches, Glenn Beck keeps touting > that… Refounding of our nation is all that we need. If only we will > elect enough Mr. Smiths to Congress, the errant course of big > government can be reversed, one step at a time… All the while, Glenn > Beck and his clones, such as Rush Limbaugh, will keep right on belly- > aching, while the country goes spiraling down-the-tubes… > > At no point do Beck and his ilk consider that our errant government > requires that corrections be made to government—as by my New > Constitution. To do so, would correct most problems with government > as early as November of 2010. If there are no problems, then, there > won’t be a need for Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh to do any more belly- > aching. Apparently, those selfish fools place more value on having > themselves remain high in the negativity ratings than they place on > actually SOLVING the problems that are bring down this once great > nation. While the USA… ‘burns’ Fox News will keep right on doing its > impotent commentary, as is approved by the likes of Brit Hume. Hume, > supposedly a research journalist a decade or so back, was fully > apprised of the to-the-bone corruption of one US Senator Strom > Thurmond of SC. But, apparently, Hume valued having Republican > loudmouths be allowed to reign free in Washington more than he valued > having only those of honesty and integrity—Mr. Smiths as it were—be in > charge. The laxity of those in the media to the spiraling corruption > in Washington, as it happened, is a big reason why government is so > out of control, now. Do we really need an IMPOTENT Fox News favoring > the disease over the cure? > > Sarah Palin’s new book is a runaway best seller. During the 2008 > presidential campaign, Palin said: “Government isn’t the solution; > government is the problem!” Of course, those were words which I used > as a frequent close to my remarks about the election, and about my New > Constitution that is in the offing. The fact that she quoted me > confirms that Palin would be at top choice to be not only the first > woman President of the United States, but the first President to serve > under my New Constitution! Unless she is a masochist, there is zero > benefit to her, nor to the country, to have her serve as President > while our government is totally screwed up. Where are the principles > of fairness and democracy that caused this nation to be founded in the > first place? Answer: They are the foundation of my New Constitution, > as they had been the foundation in the original Constitution! > > News commentary shows to be shut down by my New Constitution have > already begun “putting Palin down”. And pollsters are asking > “Democrats” whether they like Palin for President. After 2010, anyone > polling regarding an election or referenda will be committing a > felony. And anyone, such as that count-backwards-from-ten David > Letterman, who airs his personal political preferences as “humor”, or > otherwise, will shut down CBS or be fired. The status quo CRAP going > on in the media and in our government must be stopped if this nation > is to survive! > > All thinking Americans should ask themselves these five questions: > > (1.) Is government responsive to the Will of the People? > (2.) Is government honest and trustworthy? > (3.) Does government consider who must pay the costs? > (4.) Should lobbyists have more influence on government than… the > People? > (5.) Can the needed changes be made by voting-in better congressmen? > > When most Americans can answer each of those questions with a NO, then > the resolve will have been reached to ratify my New Constitution of > the United States of America. Please tell your friends, relatives and > associates that a South Carolina man has penned and polished a New > Constitution to finally put the People at the top of the pecking-order > in this country! — John A. Armistead — > > > On Oct 16, 3:31 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL. > > > > The greater the hardships that people experience, the more they will > > expect from the groups with which they’re affiliated. Those > > experiencing hardships—such as being out of work—often look to > > government either for a job, or for monetary relief. During his > > campaign, Barack Obama promised “jobs” and “tax breaks” for the middle > > class. They rewarded him for those promises by “electing” him > > President. Now, his supporters are impatient to have the ‘free’ > > things that Obama promised. > > > > Presently, Obama is experiencing a bounce in the polls following his > > being named this year’s winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. What that > > says is: About half of the population still clings to the hope that > > government is this magic cornucopia that will always provide. Since > > Democrats control both houses of Congress, Democrats figure their time > > has come to sock-it-to rich individuals and successful business > > interests. In the process, generations of Americans are being > > indebted so that the crying Democrats can get their rewards from > > government. > > > > During the 9/12 rallies, numbers of older Americans said that > > hardships being placed on them, personally, were more tolerable than > > the thought of government placing hardships on their children and > > grandchildren. Because of Obama’s spend-craziness thus far in his > > presidency, economic considerations are now outweighing the had-seemed- > > desirable goals such as having a better system of health care in this > > country. But Congress and the President aren’t heeding the call to > > retreat… Those fools mistakenly believe that government is the USA > > and that they are in charge. Until the 40% to 50% of Americans who > > blindly supported Obama finally see-the-light, the nation-killing > > legislation that’s likely to continue coming from Washington will be > > sealing our fate. > > > > One-way-wrong-way Obama is bent on destroying the last vestige of a > > work ethic in this country. By his magic… redistribution of wealth, > > he plots getting re elected. He promised those things which weren’t > > his to give in order to get “elected” in 2008. And he’s continuing to > > make those same type economic promises. Senior Americans won’t be > > getting a cost-of-living increase in Social Security next year, > > because the cost of living didn’t go up this year. Barack Obama said… > > “How terrible!” and immediately starts promising 13 billion dollars or > > so to dole out to seniors so that they will begin to side with… him. > > Seniors lived and survived before government got a mind-of-its-own. > > They know what budgets are and they know that families nor this nation > > can long survive by living beyond their means. They also can > > recognize an Obama BRIBE when they see one. And it’s a bribe that > > shifts the debt to children not yet born… > > > > America is more polarized by disparate group interests during hard > > times. Obama and the Democrats think it’s perfectly fine to take from > > the rich to give to the lazy poor. But remove the incentive to be > > successful, and you remove the incentive to start new businesses and > > create new jobs. When the taxes on a typical family exceeded 1/3rd of > > their gross income, the USA had passed the threshold to socialism. > > Give too many people meal tickets, and there won’t be anyone left to > > pay the cost. > > > > Glenn Beck’s red hot-line phone to the White House has yet to be > > used. Democrats are perfectly happy to generalize that “Republicans” > > have been misrepresenting things, but they aren’t willing to say what > > those things are. It would come as a shock to Obama and Congress to > > learn that my New Constitution requires that our elected > > representatives SERVE ALL OF THE PEOPLE, regardless of their > > ideology. To wit: > > > > “… Article 1: > > > > Section 1 & 2: Legislative power shall be vested in the House of > > Representatives. Members shall be Citizens at least 25 years old who > > have been residents of their respective states for 7 or more years and > > for the entire year prior to election. Except for military service, a > > representative shall not have held any full-time public office nor > > government employment, nor shall he or she be sponsored by a political > > party. Representatives’ districts shall have clearly defined, regular > > shaped geographical boundaries drawn without regard to the race, > > creed, age, nor political ideology of the residents therein. > > Boundaries may be redrawn from time to time, but the number of > > representatives shall not exceed 500. When vacancies happen in the > > representation from a state, the executive authority thereof shall > > issue writs of election to fill such. The House shall choose its > > speaker and other officers without regard to political affiliation, > > seniority or ideology. With the assent of 33% it can impeach and try > > impeachment. With the assent of 67%, it can convict and remove the > > one tried from office, who is still liable and subject to other lawful > > indictments, trials, judgments and punishments. > > Representatives shall be elected to two year terms by the vote of > > the People of their districts on the first Tuesday in November of even > > number years, *** and shall fairly represent all blocs of their > > electorate, or face expulsion. *** The House shall meet at the same > > times and for no less than three months, nor more than six months of > > each year, except that in times of war or internal crisis, such time > > may be extended on a monthly basis with the assent of 60% of the > > members. No House member shall serve more than 10 years in office, > > but existing representatives with 6 plus years in office may seek one > > additional two year term beyond the initial two year grace period > > allowed for all existing House members. …” > > > > Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are, hopefully, the last, largely > > tacit, group spokespersons for Blacks. My New Constitution empowers > > all law-abiding Citizens while disempowering and even criminalizing > > those who would claim to speak on a group’s behalf. Doing the latter > > is essentially lobbying, which shall be outlawed. And since group > > influences aren’t democratic, nor fair, and because groups polarize > > and divide this country, those will be disallowed from having undue > > influence on government. But not-to-worry! No spokespersons will be > > needed if the rightful influence of one-person-one-vote is allowed to > > determine our laws and course as a nation! Disparate Americans have > > far more in common than you may realize. > > > > Under my New Constitution Rush Limbaugh can’t be denied an opportunity > > to purchase an NFL team because he exercised (or exercises) free > > speech. Such wouldn’t be fair, nor democratic! But having Rush > > continue to belly-ache about liberal vs. conservative issues would be > > in direct violation. NBC News, CNN and etc., and any so-called > > conservative talk radio or etc. will be disallowed. To wit: > > > > “ … Bill of Rights and Amendments: > > > > 1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall > > be secular. *** No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the > > freedom of speech; the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or > > other medium ***; the right of People to peaceably assemble; and the > > right of any Citizen or group to petition government or any of its > > branches or departments for redress of grievances. Citizens so > > petitioning government shall receive appropriate, relevant, timely, > > comprehensive, helpful and just responses from proper authorities who > > have thoroughly read, understood, and addressed each salient aspect of > > the grievances or requests for directions or clarifications. Failure > > to so respond to a rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, > > on a single provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, > > especially those in management or public office—including judges and > > justices—who ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent > > Citizen who has been diligent in having a grievance properly > > addressed, or in having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No > > judge or justice shall presume that by performing the above required > > duties, that they in any way might be compromising their objectivity > > or fairness in court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. > > Freedom of the press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable > > truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or > > deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or > > satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news > > medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any issue is > > prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials; regularly > > occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs financed by, or > > ideologically screened by, the same news medium; editorials named as > > being authored by management; editorial comments by others that are in > > any way ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments > > occurring at specific times or designated locations that most would > > come to associate with the management of such medium, even if such are > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of lose of > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any > > pending election or referendum. Nor shall they invite others outside > > of the media to do so. But factual, thorough coverage of the > > candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed, > > provided there are no comments, nor actions, as above, and provided > > the same unbiased coverage is given ... > > > > read more » > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
