LITTLE THAT CONGRESS DOES IS CONSTITUTIONAL! Most of our supposed representatives in Washington consider themselves to be our… elected dictators. With Barack Obama setting the tone, apparently, it’s more important for those in power to carry out the last election’s campaign promises than it is, simply, to do what the majority of American’s want. And what might that be? STOP spending this country into bankruptcy! Our Federal Government has long since past “critical mass”. It’ll surely explode on us all unless we do something really prudent: Ratify my New Constitution of the United States of America, and put the American People back at the top of the pecking order!
This week, that on-again-off-again, he’s loosing-it man, Glenn Beck, chalked on his blackboard: “Is mandatory health care constitutional?” Beck pointed out that that basic question has been sidestepped by Democrats. He cited the fact that Benjamin Franklin, who was in great pain due to kidney stones, didn’t recommend to the Constitutional Convention that this country provide national health care. But is it necessary for there to be a reference in the Constitution to national health care in order for such to be sanctioned? No! And that can work only ONE way. The 10th Amendment to the Constitution says: “… Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.” Be it known: National Health Care, NOT referred to anywhere in the Constitution, is automatically an issue controlled either by the expressed wishes of each individual state, or such POWER shall be reserved to the PEOPLE. The Constitution doesn’t grant Congress the power to do a single thing that goes against the wishes of the majority of Americans!!!!! And being the ‘majority party’ in Washington shall never negate that important fact!!!!! Like Glenn Beck, Senator Orrin Hatch—a staunch proponent for sensible government and fiscal responsibility—is now raising the issue of constitutionality regarding how the Democratic-controlled Congress is trying to change the very fabric of this country, with little or no concern for the disastrous economic consequences. Hatch discussed the latter with a look of desperation and maybe even hopelessness… Perhaps he feels that the courts might could save us from our desperate hours simply by declaring that what Sen. Harry Reid and Rep. Nancy Pelosi are doing—bribing their way to the required votes—isn’t Constitutional. Folks, the MAJORITY of what Congress has done, and the majority of the laws that have been made aren’t constitutional! The most simple, underlying, though tacit, statement of what our Constitution is all about is this one sentence: “Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in America.” If only that sentence were our constitution, the USA would be in far better shape than it is, now. Orrin Hatch, however well intended, is a member of the US Senate, an ANTI democracy body of our government. Allowing 100 men and women to have, effectively, half of the total power of Congress is an inexcusable error by our Founding Fathers! Such happened because smaller states, fearing oppression by larger states, demanded that there be a US Senate to counter the RIGHTFUL power of DEMOCRACY. The US Senate has been the haven for career politician who keep getting re elected because of their… power. As I’ve recently stated, career politicians—the elitists who are constantly in the media spotlight— have made our government into a mindless RULING CLASS, against the specific wishes of George Washington and the majority of the Founding Fathers, that we have no… kings. Senator Orrin Hatch, instead of seeming hopeless in the face of abuses by the Democratic Party, should orate TO THE RAFTERS, that national health care, because such is against the wishes of the majority of Americans, is, therefore, ABSOLUTELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL! There are no required rulings by any court to determine if that’s true; the Constitution says so in the 10th Amendment!!!!! Barack Obama made a Freudian Slip this week when he likened how close health care is to passing, to… being on a “precipice”. The latter is like a CLIFF that will take the lives of all who go over the edge. In Obama’s COLD heart, he knows that his national health care reform will be taking the American People over that “precipice” and to their figurative deaths. The only people who should be standing on the edge of that precipice—and with tight nooses around their necks—are the likes of Reid, Pelosi, and Obama, each of whom would rather destroy our could-be FAIR and pro democracy government, as well as the American way of life, than to admit that their ideals for America are simply wrong. A solution is in the offing: Each one of you who reads this should start demanding to all who will listen—not just constitutional counters to Congress’s actions—but the simple, one-day ratification of my powerful New Constitution! Such will make our government subordinate to the Will of the People. Our SURVIVAL as a nation could well depend on it. — John A. Armistead — > On Nov 29, 10:48 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > CHUCK WOOLERY’S IDEAS ARE MIRRORED IN NEW CONSTITUTION. > > The week, Mike Huckabee had TV personality Chuck Woolery—former host > of ‘Love Connection’—as a guest. Contrary to the usual Hollywood > liberalism, Woolery has joined the conservative movement. In > introducing Woolery, Huckabee paraphrased him as having said: > “Politicians who are too in love with power shouldn’t get too > connected to their jobs.” > > Recently, I’ve said that democracy isn’t about sending the most > powerful officials to Washington to… ‘fight for you’ (as SC Senator > Lindsey Graham said this week in a TV ad). Democracy gives all the > people an equal vote, regardless of that person’s oratory or ability > to win arguments. Incumbents keep getting elected because they have > convinced the voters that having powerful representatives is an > advantage. But fighting… across-the-aisles in Washington just isn’t > getting the job done. > > In his opening remarks, Woolery said, “ ‘Career’ and ‘politician’ > should never be linked together.” My New Constitution will have 100% > of the career politicians gone within four years. The reason they > won’t all be gone from day one is because those familiar with the > workings of the House should stay around for a while to help edify the > new guys how things work. After four years, those new guys should > know the processes well enough not to need any of the career > politicians. > > Mike Huckabee asked Woolery if he thinks there should be term limits > for Congress. Chuck said, “Yes. But I’m not sure how it gets done… > Power **seduces career politicians.” He supposed that two terms, like > for the President, should be sufficient. That would be four years for > representatives and twelve years for senators. Well, Chuck, it can > ‘get done’ simply by ratifying my New Constitution as soon as > possible! Because the US Senate will be GONE from day one, I > recommend that terms totaling one decade be the maximum for House > members and for Justices of the Supreme Court. > > **I had said, in referring to Rep. Ron Paul, “He has been seduced by > the pomp and circumstances in Washington. He could have been > President if only he had said too hell with Washington, and > recommended that we ratify my New Constitution." > > Woolery lamented that Washington has the IRS and other ways to cause > the public to be fearful. Then, he insisted, “Washington needs to be > afraid of US! We need to drill them.” (Perhaps like a drill > sergeant.) My New Constitution removes restrictions on who can sue > whom. Those in government who wrong any citizen will no longer be > able to escape by claiming they were only doing their public job. > Those working in government shall respect the general public, because > any law-abiding citizen who catches any government official or > employee violating the New Constitution can FIRE that person on-the- > spot! “It’s our government, not theirs!”, Woolery said. > > Along the way, Mike Huckabee said, “Tea parties are one of the > greatest movements in America.” > > Woolery replied, “People should really turn on the government!” > > Very importantly, Woolery said, “Lawyers should not be voted into > office!” Clearly, lawyers are on of the main groups responsible for > the decline of our once great country, and of our government. Below > are some of the much needed restrictions on how lawyers can do > business in the future: > > “… Obtaining a lawyer in civil cases is as fundamental to justice as > obtaining a lawyer in criminal cases. No statute of limitation shall > apply to any case in which a plaintiff or defendant diligently seeks > but can’t find a lawyer. Upon request to the court, an unbiased > lawyer shall be appointed. In federal cases licensed lawyers from any > state or territory may be used regardless of where the trial takes > place. The right of the People to obtain justice for any criminal or > civil injury is fundamental. Justice departments, law enforcement > agencies, and/or the courts shall be the instruments of justice. > Should such in any way obstruct justice by improper procedure, bias, > or intentional neglect of duty, such persons shall be held as > criminally accountable as anyone else for obstruction of justice—a > felony. Undue delay by a defendant or their counsel in a civil case— > as a defensive tactic—is prohibited, and if present may be considered > as evidence supporting guilt. Causing undue delay of appeals, > similarly, is prohibited. > > Section 8: It’s a felony for any person, organization, group, or > special interest—publicly or privately—to lobby judges or justices for > influencing their rulings; also, for any judge or justice to accept a > bribe in exchange for a judicial favor. It’s a capital offense for > such to accept a bribe that directly results in a person’s death. > It’s a felony to extort an innocent defendant into pleading guilty by > threatening to try them for a greater crime; ipso facto, the greater > crime is excused. Law enforcement and the courts shall be responsive > rather than proactive, protective without being subjugative, and shall > enforce the New Constitution ahead of any other laws or employment > hierarchies. Racial or other statistical profiling, preemptive > arrests, detention or sentencing are illegal if a person’s > constitutional rights are violated. In a national emergency the > President may waive the latter. It’s a felony for an attorney to > acquiesce to their client’s ongoing violations of this constitution, > and/or their criminal conduct, without censure; or for any reason to > conspire to violate, or violate, another person’s civil rights; or to > stonewall the easy resolution of justified complaints by non action, > legal shenanigans or personal bias. Similarly, it’s a civil offense > for an individual, group or business to require that a justified > plaintiff have an attorney before moving to make agreeable amends. > States shall license no attorney on the payroll or board of another > type business, organization or non-judicial governmental agency; nor > one who violates this constitution; nor one who because of personal > bias, fails to competently defend the civil rights of any Citizen. > Incorporation doesn’t protect those in such from personal > responsibility for maliciousness in: harming any person; irremediably > harming local or world environs; or endangering the likely health and > safety of local or world Citizens. A crime’s seriousness shall be > consistent with the mores of the People and the apt juries rather than > with government. Judges & justices shall be well mannered, forthright > and succinct; courtrooms aren’t their property nor forums for venting > their feelings. A Citizen can sanction a judge or justice in court > for deviating from this constitution or its spirit. Rightful behavior > by any law abiding Citizen is appropriate, implicitly, and no Citizen > so acting shall be subordinate in or to any court, nor be made to > defer to overly drawn-out legal processes or pending rulings. > > 33rd Amendment: Diverse backgrounds of representatives in the House > are desirable for fair government. Therefore, if any profession shall > be present in numbers exceeding 20% of the total of all > representatives, in the next election of representatives, those > candidates from such profession shall be required to win by a margin > of at least 5% of the final total vote in that district. Should the > next term’s number of representatives from such profession still > exceed 20%, the margin required to win shall be raised to 10%, and > etc., until the proportion from such profession is 20% or less. Such > margin reverts, in steps, at 20% or less. After three elections, any > profession still constituting more than 20% of the house shall never > again be taught as a major at any public institution, and thereafter, > no public financing shall be allowed toward such major at any private > institution. …” > > Mr. Nice Guy, Mike Huckabee—a possible candidate for President in 2012— > needs to TOUGHEN UP and realize that the best… and thus the “nicest” > thing for the most Americans will be to get the rascals and career > politicians out of Washington! There are literally thousands of clear- > thinking, business-like men and women who will be willing to cooperate > to revamp and streamline our government, IF they know that the media > won’t be publicizing their every word or deed. In the future, when a > representative goes to work in Washington, ‘bib overalls’ will be just > as appropriate an attire as custom-made suits and… ‘power’ ties. The > latter vestments have gotten this country into enough problems, don’t > you think? — John A. Armistead — > > > > On Nov 26, 11:28 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > WILL THE USA SINK OR SWIM ON HAVING GLENN BECK SHAME CONGRESS? > > > Sara Palin’s new autobiography is headed for its first million copies > > sold. A serial author who is more notorious—Glenn Beck—is now rated > > right up there with Palin as a person of national media interest. > > Beck is one of President Barack Obama’s main detractors who regularly > > points out every folly and foible of the nuts supposedly ‘representing > > us’ in Washington. > > > This week Beck delivered a most damming put-down of Congress— > > essentially telling Congress: “Shame on you!” The declining support > > in the polls for Obama Care, or for having Congress increase spending > > in any way, has managed to escape Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, et al. > > Like the computer “HAL” in the movie ‘2001, A Space Odyssey’, > > Congress, quite literally, needs to be unplugged. > > > We now have no semblance of a government like the Founding Fathers > > wanted. Those men had disdained the kings and oppressive governments > > as were known in Europe. They wanted to be sure that government in > > America would always > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
