you're in school? brace yourself for a lot more lies especially considering the liberal leaning of most college profs these days
On Jan 15, 3:16 pm, LadybugsTX <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm talking pre-Civil War. > > On Jan 15, 1:09 pm, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I guess what I'm looking for is how to > > combat this lie. > > --- > > it's not a lie > > > Like the lies about slavery. One of the favorites > > is that slaves were made 3/5 a person. This is true, > > --- > > then it's not a lie > > > because giving them a full count would have given the South an > > unbeatable majority in the House and Senate and we would have never > > had the chance to abolish slavery. > > --- > > hogwash > > > Most people know the battles and the generals, but they don’t > > understand why it was fought. They know it stopped slavery in the U.S. > > but they don’t know how this happened. There are many myths about why > > the Civil War was fought and how slaves were freed. Click below to > > find out the truth about each of the top ten myths about the Civil > > War. > > > Myth #1: The Civil War was the first argument over slavery. > > > Myth #2: The Civil War was fought over slavery. > > > Myth #3: The U.S. was the only country to allow slavery before the > > Civil War. > > > Myth #4: Before the Civil War all Blacks were slaves and all slaves > > were black. > > > Myth #5: All people in the north wanted to end slavery. > > > Myth #6: All people in the south wanted slavery. > > > Myth #7: All black people who fought in the Civil War fought for the > > north. > > > Myth #8: The Emancipation Proclamation freed all black people. > > > Myth #9: After the Civil War all black men had the right to vote. > > > Myth #10: At the end of Civil War all Blacks and Whites were treated > > as equals. > > >http://library.thinkquest.org/J0112391/civil_war.htm > > > On Jan 15, 2:59 pm, LadybugsTX <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ok, but there has to be some sort of half-truth that this came from, > > > or theory they base this on. I guess what I'm looking for is how to > > > combat this lie. Like the lies about slavery. One of the favorites > > > is that slaves were made 3/5 a person. This is true, but the reason > > > was because giving them a full count would have given the South an > > > unbeatable majority in the House and Senate and we would have never > > > had the chance to abolish slavery. Freed people of color and black > > > immigrants were counted as one just like anybody else. > > > > On Jan 14, 9:36 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ladybug, > > > > > It's actually not a theory but fabrication and distortion on > > > > the part of neo black groups and liberal socialist seeking to control > > > > the seat of government to further their socialist agenda. When things > > > > do not work their way the " race card " is their ace in the hole to > > > > use . > > > > > ****************************************************************************************************** > > > > > On Jan 14, 11:12 pm, LadybugsTX <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Oh, I get all that, but in a search for an event that would make > > > > > Democrats of old some how traded places with the Republicans and now > > > > > the Republicans are racist. What drives that ridiculous theory? > > > > > > On Jan 14, 6:02 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Ladybug, > > > > > > > It is typical Democrat double standards that Byrd ( D ) > > > > > > West > > > > > > Virginia aka; KKK Wizard, is more respectable than lets say Trent > > > > > > Lott (R) Tenn. ( senator with a bad joke ) or even Harry Reid (D) > > > > > > Nevada who said that " Obama was a light skinned without a Negro > > > > > > dialect unless he wanted one ". Of course what Harry does not > > > > > > understand ( like all dembots don't ) is that Obama is not Negro > > > > > > but > > > > > > a mulatto . Yes! They certainly have problems retaining or fact > > > > > > finding, especially if it suits their socialist liberal agenda. > > > > > > > ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* > > > > > > > On Jan 14, 8:50 pm, LadybugsTX <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, I read a fantastic book about the history of slavery in the > > > > > > > US and > > > > > > > all of the many, many lies told or facts omitted from the facts. > > > > > > > My > > > > > > > question is this. Where in the hell did the Victacrats and Neo- > > > > > > > Marxist/Socialist/Progressive/Populists theory come from that the > > > > > > > Republicans and Democrats of old have switched places and now the > > > > > > > Republicans are the racists? I have searched and searched and can > > > > > > > find nothing based in any kind of reality to support that claim. > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > mean really, there is still a hard core ex (so he says) KKK member > > > > > > > proudly holding a Senate seat. Can someone explain this to me?- > > > > > > > Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
