Yes, I still pay taxes on my retirement after paying taxes 21 years in the  
job I retired from.  My job offered an early retirement and since, thanks  
to an inheritance from my late parents, I was able to buy my house outright 
I  took it at age 55.  Unless you make over $250,000/year your taxes were  
reduced.  Period.
 
 
In a message dated 5/17/2010 5:34:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Do you pay taxes Proud  Liberal Number 7???
 
By no means am I rich, but I am  paying more in taxes now, and I have 
worked for thirty-nine years, than I ever  have before.
 
 
 



On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:27 PM, <[email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) >  wrote:


Yup, time for the rich's free ride to end and for them to pay their  fair 
share of the freight.  Bummer for them - I'm sure the millions  they'll have 
left AFTER taxes will put them straight into the  poorhouse.  Oh, the agony!
 
Conservatives whine and Conservatives  bitch
"Our rich are too poor and our poor are too  rich!"
 
 
 

 
In a message dated 5/17/2010 5:24:27 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  writes:



 

 
The tax rate on  who??  Despite the charges by liberals and socialists that 
the  tax cuts favored the “rich,” these cuts actually reduced the tax  
burden of low- and middle-income taxpayers and shifted the tax burden onto  
wealthier taxpayers. 
 

Updated April 16, 2010 
Guess Who Didn't Pay Taxes On Tax Day
By Elizabeth Factor and & Mallory Factor  
- FOXNews.com  
_http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/16/elizabeth-factor-mallory-factor-f
ederal-income-tax-tax-day-americans-democrats/_ 
(http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/16/elizabeth-factor-mallory-factor-federal-income-tax-tax-day-am
ericans-democrats/)  
Progressive Democrats are using “tax reform” to create a group of  
Americans who pay no federal income tax at all. 
Did you file your federal _income  taxes  _ 
(https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#)  

on or before April 15? Almost 50% of American households won’t be  paying 
any federal income tax this year, and the reasons why have profound  
implications for our democracy as well as our economy now. 
A series of tax reforms, generous exemptions and tax credits, including  
last year’s _economic_ 
(https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#)   
stimulus bill, have dropped millions of Americans 
from the federal tax  rolls. Huge numbers of Americans are simply no longer 
affected by the  federal income tax. The Tax Policy Center projects that 47 
percent of all  U.S. households will pay no federal income tax for 2009. And, 
the bottom  40 percent of income earners actually receive a cash payment  
from the government at tax time. This cash payment is styled as a  “refund” 
but it is actually a net cash transfer from the government--not a  refund of 
taxes actually withheld on income. And for many Americans, this  cash 
transfer from Uncle Sam actually exceeds all federal, state and local  taxes 
that 
they pay in any form during the year including _sales_ 
(https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#)   
taxes and social 
security taxes. 
Of course, we are accustomed to the idea that high income earners pay  more 
in taxes both in absolute terms and as a percentage of their incomes.  But 
taxing only the top half of a society is not normal progressive  taxation. 
Instead, the recent changes to our tax system are an example of  politicians 
using the tax code for their own political ends. In this case,  the 
so-called progressive Democratic politicians are using “tax reform” to  grow 
their 
political base by creating a group of Americans that pay no  federal income 
tax. 
The people who don’t pay federal income taxes are, as the phrase goes,  “
rational economic actors” just as much as anyone. Like all people,  
non-taxpayers respond to economic incentives. Their demand for  entitlements 
and 
government programs is naturally insatiable because they  don’t care at all 
about the cost. Non-taxpayers don’t have any “skin in  the game” and are 
completely indifferent to the government raising income  taxes. So they will 
always support increasing government programs as a  long as they get even a 
small 
benefit from them because it does not cost  them a cent. It’s also 
perfectly rational for non-taxpayers to support  politicians who favor more 
spending. Non-taxpayers get something for  nothing, at least until the country 
becomes insolvent.  
The so-called progressive Democratic politicians are rational actors  too. 
By taking more and more Americans off the federal tax rolls, they are  
creating a permanent base of supporters for themselves. These politicians  may 
claim to support increased government spending because of their  concern for 
the less-fortunate but--hey, it also happens to be in their  own political 
self-interest. And these politicians will continue to spend  on these programs 
until our nation goes bust because they want to keep  their jobs and grow 
expensive programs for their political base. 
 
And what about the people paying all the federal taxes? Well,  taxpayers 
respond to incentives too. When faced with increasing tax rates,  taxpayers 
will reduce their income, which is why it is impossible to raise  a lot of 
revenue by increasing taxes above a certain point. As taxes on  income rise, 
taxpayers spend less time on work and more on leisure. They  avoid sales of 
investments and assets which could trigger income until  they can pair them 
with offsetting losses from other transactions. They  spend billions of 
dollars on tax advice and structuring to reduce their  tax burden, which makes 
economic sense for them but which is a waste of  resources for our society. In 
the aggregate, a tax system that is hostile  to investment and growth has a 
distortive effect which harms U.S.  productivity and reduces the standard of 
living of our whole  nation.

Under the Obama administration, many Americans accustomed to paying  their 
share of federal taxes are being taken off the tax rolls. Recent tax  law 
changes mean that for the first time, in 2009, a _family_ 
(https://mail.google.com/mail/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.html#)   
of four making 
$50,000 can pay no federal income tax at all. This family  may not change its 
behavior and outlook immediately from its taxpaying  days. But the family’s 
economic incentives are now to keep America taxing  and spending. And a 
family at this income level has surely suffered in  this recession, but should 
they really pay no federal income tax  at all? 
Ronald Reagan once said that a taxpayer is “someone who works for the  
Federal government but doesn’t have to take the civil service  examination.” 
Every American should have to work for the federal  government at least a 
little bit. We need to move back to a broad-based  tax system so that more 
Americans understand that there is no such thing  as free money—government 
spending actually has a huge cost for our  nation. 
The so-called "progressive" politicians have turned John Kennedy’s “Ask  
not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your  country”
 on its head. And telling so many Americans that they don’t need  to make 
sacrifices for our government, as we are now saying, is dangerous  new 
territory for our nation and for the health of our democracy and  economy. 
Elizabeth Factor is an international tax lawyer and former  investment 
banker.Mallory Factor is the co-chairman and co-founder of the  Monday Meeting, 
an influential meeting of economic conservatives,  journalists and corporate 
leaders in New York City. Mr. Factor is a  well-known merchant banker and 
speaks and writes frequently on economic  and fiscal topics for news 
stations, leading newspapers and other print  and online publications. Mr. 
Factor 
writes frequently for the Fox Forum.  Mr. Factor can be reached at 
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) . 



-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google  Groups.
For options & help see _http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum) 

*  Visit our other community at _http://www.PoliticalForum.com/_ 
(http://www.politicalforum.com/)  
* It's active and  moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking  news, and more.



 

 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google  Groups.
For options & help see _http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum) 

*  Visit our other community at _http://www.PoliticalForum.com/_ 
(http://www.politicalforum.com/)  
* It's active and  moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking  news, and more.




-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google  Groups.
For options & help see _http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum_ 
(http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum) 

*  Visit our other community at _http://www.PoliticalForum.com/_ 
(http://www.politicalforum.com/)  
*  It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the  latest breaking news, and more.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to