Euwe,

This post says and or implies the same as your first. Repeating it
makes it no more correct nor does it affect my response to your first
post or it veracity. You are correct, they can not be sent to prison,
just "detainment centers" while awaiting processing. Arizona is
willing to hold all it detains while they await deportation, thus
relieving the federal government of this financial burden.

The constitution guarantees free passage amongst the 50 states and
various territories and possessions  to all who are inside these
borders legally... it is mute on whose responsibility these illegal
people are once here and inside a particular states frontiers and the
10th Amendment gives all rights not specifically mentioned in that
document to the states.

Arizonas new law is in direct compliance with present Federal statute
with one exception... they are not allowed to profile.. the Feds are.

Try again please.

On May 21, 3:57 pm, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
>  "Illegal presence" as the offense is called, is not a violation of
> the U.S. criminal code. A person cannot be sent to prison for being
> here without authorization from immigration authorities. It is,
> however, a violation of civil immigration laws, for which the federal
> government can impose civil penalties, namely deportation
>
> On May 21, 4:42 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I did not realize that that was ever a question put forth here. I do
> > know that if they cross with another person or persons or use the
> > services of a third party to do so it is a conspiracy and therefore IS
> > actually a felony under federal statute; to wit:
>
> > An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an
> > unlawful or criminal act, or an act that is innocent in itself but
> > becomes unlawful when done by the combination of actors.
>
> > Conspiracy is governed by statute in federal courts and most state
> > courts. Before its Codification in state and federal statutes, the
> > crime of conspiracy was simply an agreement to engage in an unlawful
> > act with the intent to carry out the act. Federal statutes, and many
> > state statutes, now require not only agreement and intent but also the
> > commission of an Overt Act in furtherance of the agreement.
>
> > Conspiracy is a crime separate from the criminal act for which it is
> > developed. For example, one who conspires with another to commit
> > Burglary and in fact commits the burglary can be charged with both
> > conspiracy to commit burglary and burglary.
>
> > Conspiracy is an inchoate, or preparatory, crime. It is similar to
> > solicitation in that both crimes are committed by manifesting an
> > intent to engage in a criminal act. It differs from solicitation in
> > that conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons,
> > whereas solicitation can be committed by one person alone.
>
> > Conspiracy also resembles attempt. However, attempt, like
> > solicitation, can be committed by a single person. On another level,
> > conspiracy requires less than attempt. A conspiracy may exist before a
> > crime is actually attempted, whereas no attempt charge will succeed
> > unless the requisite attempt is made.
>
> > The law seeks to punish conspiracy as a substantive crime separate
> > from the intended crime because when two or more persons agree to
> > commit a crime, the potential for criminal activity increases, and as
> > a result, the danger to the public increases. Therefore, the very act
> > of an agreement with criminal intent (along with an overt act, where
> > required) is considered sufficiently dangerous to warrant charging
> > conspiracy as an offense separate from the intended crime.
>
> > Try again please.
>
> > On May 21, 2:05 pm, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Theirs is a civil infraction, not prosecutable in criminal courts
> > > until they have been deported at least once.
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to