22.  euwe
May 23, 5:41 pm
I've heard you reiterating a point that doesn't apply. Your
references
apply to smuggler
----
still defending illegal immigrants I see




Establishing that somMay 23, 5:41 pm, euwe <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I've heard you reiterating a point that doesn't apply. Your references
> apply to smugglers.
>
> Establishing that someone who is simply "present" without
> documentation helped someone to come in, and is therefore guilty of a
> felony is not a forgone conclusion - it requires at least one witness,
> evidence, or confession, since criminal violations assume innocence.
> Neither witness, evidence or testimony that the immigrant was guilty
> of helping somoene across would be available during a simple
> discovery, nor would one think, at any time from then until  they are
> deported.
>
> You might insist on repeating your "analysis" again, but it' would not
> make "being an illegal alien" a felony. Even after another 10 or so
> repetitions, it will still be a civil violation to be illigally
> present in the United States.
>
> Try again.
>
> On May 23, 3:45 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > As I keep saying.... it is on the books as a felony.... I would imagine that
> > the research done by these people is a whole lot more thorough than yours.
>
> > The Congressional Research Service (CRS), in an Apr. 6, 2006 report entitled
> > "Immigration Enforcement Within the United States," offered the following:
>
> > "The INA [Immigration and Nationality Act] includes both criminal and civil
> > components, providing both for criminal charges (e.g., alien smuggling,
> > which is prosecuted in the federal courts) and for civil violations (e.g.,
> > lack of legal status, which may lead to removal through a separate
> > administrative system in the Department of Justice). Being illegally present
> > in the U.S. has always been a civil, not criminal, violation of the INA, and
> > subsequent deportation and associated administrative processes are civil
> > proceedings. For instance, a lawfully admitted nonimmigrant alien may become
> > deportable if his visitor's visa expires or if his student status changes.
> > Criminal violations of the INA, on the other hand, include felonies and
> > misdemeanors and are prosecuted in federal district courts. These types of
> > violations include the bringing in and harboring of certain undocumented
> > aliens, the illegal entry of aliens, and the reentry of aliens previously
> > excluded or deported."
> > *
> > *
>
> > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:29 PM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > CIVIL CONSPIRACY
> > > 'The elements of an action for civil conspiracy are the formation and
> > > operation of the conspiracy and damage resulting to plaintiff from an
> > > act or acts done in furtherance of the common design. . . . In such an
> > > action the major significance of the conspiracy lies in the fact that
> > > it renders each participant in the wrongful act responsible as a joint
> > > tortfeasor for all damages ensuing from the wrong, irrespective of
> > > whether or not he was a direct actor and regardless of the degree of
> > > his activity.'' (Doctors' Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 49 Cal.3d 44,
> > > citing Mox Incorporated v. Woods (1927) 202 Cal. 675, 677-78.)' (Id.
> > > at 511.)
>
> > > 'Conspiracy is not a cause of action, but a legal doctrine that
> > > imposes liability on persons who, although not actually committing a
> > > tort themselves, share with the immediate tortfeasors a common plan or
> > > design in its perpetration. By participation in a civil conspiracy, a
> > > coconspirator effectively adopts as his or her own the torts of other
> > > coconspirators within the ambit of the conspiracy. In this way, a
> > > coconspirator incurs tort liability co-equal with the immediate
> > > tortfeasors. Standing alone, a conspiracy does no harm and engenders
> > > no tort liability. It must be activated by the commission of an actual
> > > tort. ''A civil conspiracy, however atrocious, does not per se give
> > > rise to a cause of action unless a civil wrong has been committed
> > > resulting in damage.'' 'A bare agreement among two or more persons to
> > > harm a third person cannot injure the latter unless and until acts are
> > > actually performed pursuant to the agreement. Therefore, it is the
> > > acts done and not the conspiracy to do them which should be regarded
> > > as the essence of the civil action.' [para.s] By its nature, tort
> > > liability arising from conspiracy presupposes that the coconspirator
> > > is legally capable of committing the tort, i.e., that he or she owes a
> > > duty to plaintiff recognized by law and is potentially subject to
> > > liability for breach of that duty.' (Allied Equipment Corp. v. Litton
> > > Saudi Arabia Ltd., supra, 7 Cal.4th at 510-11.)
>
> > > On May 23, 3:27 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Presence in the United states without permission is a civil
> > > > infraction. For it to be a criminal offience, the offender has to have
> > > > been deported.
>
> > > > That is assuming he/she acted alone.
>
> > > > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > One of the most fundamental distinctions between civil and criminal
> > > > > law is in the notion of punishment.
>
> > > > > criminal law
> > > > > In criminal law, a guilty defendant is punished by either (1)
> > > > > incarceration in a jail or prison, (2) fine paid to the government,
> > > > > or, in exceptional cases, (3) execution of the defendant: the death
> > > > > penalty. Crimes are divided into two broad classes: felonies have a
> > > > > maximum possible sentence of more than one year incarceration,
> > > > > misdemeanors have a maximum possible sentence of less than one year
> > > > > incarceration.
>
> > > > > civil law
> > > > > In contrast, a defendant in civil litigation is never incarcerated and
> > > > > never executed. In general, a losing defendant in civil litigation
> > > > > only reimburses the plaintiff for losses caused by the defendant's
> > > > > behavior.
>
> > > > > So-called punitive damages are never awarded in a civil case under
> > > > > contract law. In a civil case under tort law, there is a possibility
> > > > > of punitive damages, if the defendant's conduct is egregious and had
> > > > > either (1) a malicious intent (i.e., desire to cause harm), (2) gross
> > > > > negligence (i.e., conscious indifference), or (3) a willful disregard
> > > > > for the rights of others. The use of punitive damages makes a public
> > > > > example of the defendant and supposedly deters future wrongful conduct
> > > > > by others. Punitive damages are particularly important in torts
> > > > > involving dignitary harms (e.g., invasion of privacy) and civil
> > > > > rights, where the actual monetary injury to plaintiff(s) may be
> > > > > small.
>
> > > > > One can purchase insurance that will pay damages and attorney's fees
> > > > > for tort claims. Such insurance coverage is a standard part of
> > > > > homeowner's insurance policies, automobile insurance, and insurance
> > > > > for businesses. In contrast, it is not possible for a defendant to
> > > > > purchase insurance to pay for his/her criminal acts.
>
> > > > > While a court can order a defendant to pay damages, the plaintiff may
> > > > > receive nothing if the defendant has no assets and no insurance, or if
> > > > > the defendant is skillful in concealing assets. In this way, large
> > > > > awards for plaintiffs in tort cases are often an illusion.
> > > > > -------------------
> > > > > Presence in the United states without permission is a civil
> > > > > infraction. For it to be a criminal offience, the offender has to have
> > > > > been deported.
>
> > > > > On May 23, 3:09 pm, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Immigration law is civil law; law enforcement never enforces civil
> > > > > > law,
>
> > > > > > On May 23, 12:05 pm, Harry Beck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >  I agree, therefore the name ILLEGAL aliens.
>
> > > > > > >  Harry Beck
> > > > > > > Capt. US Army, Ret.
> > > > > > > Montrose, New York
>
> > > > > > > Wherever you go, no matter what the weather, bring your own
> > > sunshine.
>
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: plainolamerican <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > To: PoliticalForum <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > Sent: Sun, May 23, 2010 11:49 am
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Illegal aliens are not criminals
>
> > > > > > > yeah, I heard this defense from an ACLU lawyer once
>
> > > > > > > those who break the law are considered criminals
>
> > > > > > > On May 21, 3:05 pm, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Theirs is a civil infraction, not prosecutable in criminal 
> > > > > > > > courts
> > > > > > > > until they have been deported at least once.
>
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > * Visit our other
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Reply via email to