You are not answering the question. You are just trying to push the
question somewhere else. Meanwhile back to Zero trying to stop the
clean up so he can have a bigger crisis not to waste (thank you, Rahm,
for telling us your philosophy of government - explains the terrible job
this admin is doing). Guess you have problems answering that
truthfully so you try to hijack the subject. Typical of Dem liars.
euwe wrote:
So Libby just refused to answer because he had a sudden anxiety
attack? - that fits the facts, doesn't it.
On Jun 20, 9:41 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
Suppose you then find out what the FBI did with the original interview
of Tom Russet. They claimed they could not find it at all. Then you
have a member of the jury who was a former assistant to Russet and was
releasing notes he took so he could write a book about the trial and the
jury deliberations. That is patently illegal. Then you have a judge
that claims that the prosecution cannot bring up new things in the
summation and Fitz brought up a slew of things that could not be
answered because the defense had already spoken. The judge permitted
it. And to this day the man who really released the fact that Plame
was CIA ,Richard ARmitage of the State Dept, was left alone totally and
he was the one who should have been on trial. That is the truth and
you cannot deny it. There were so many mangled points in that trial
that it should have been null processed and restarted to keep within
legal constraints.
euwe wrote:
Have your fun, but the difference between commuting a sentence and
pardoning doesn't change the fact that he was sympathetic to those who
were involved in the Plame affair. Your complaints are nothing but
legalistic obfuscation of the truth - as was Bush.
On Jun 20, 5:37 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
FS. You lied. Out and out lied. And did it on purpose. If nobody
called you on it then it might stuck like that claims that Sarah said
she could see Russia from her back yard. Never happened. That was
Tina Fey. You are trying to do the same thing again. Liar. Big
plain old liar.
euwe wrote:
I didn't lie, I "misspoke" - you know, like Cheney when he said "I
think he has indeed, reconstituted nuclear weapons."
On Jun 20, 5:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
so he did not pardon him. You lied again as usual.
euwe wrote:
right you are - he was just spared prison time for obstruction of
justice.
My decision to commute his prison sentence leaves in place a harsh
punishment for Mr. Libby. The reputation he gained through his years
of public service and professional work in the legal community is
forever damaged. His wife and young children have also suffered
immensely. He will remain on probation. The significant fines imposed
by the judge will remain in effect. The consequences of his felony
conviction on his former life as a lawyer, public servant, and private
citizen will be long-lasting.
The Constitution gives the President the power of clemency to be used
when he deems it to be warranted. It is my judgment that a commutation
of the prison term in Mr. Libby's case is an appropriate exercise of
this power.
On Jun 20, 5:09 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
There you go again. Bush did not pardon Libby. However your boy Bubba
pardoned all sorts of people to get support for his wife and to gain big
bucks (remember Mark Rich?).
euwe wrote:
Whatever happened to "Personal Responsibility" ?
---------
You mean "I forgot?"
or "I pardoned Libby?"
On Jun 20, 5:39 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
Whatever happened to "Personal Responsibility" ?? These ships were
not manned by tourists but by seasoned sailors who are just, if not
more so, concerned with the preservation of their own life as the
USCG.
Just which professional is more correct... the seasoned sailor or the
seasoned sailor commanded by an organization that has never had a
successful "private or public" enterprise ??
On Jun 18, 4:01 pm, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
oh, I get it - you're a libertoonian. So have you got your own carpet
cleaning business? Or maybe you refinish parking lot blacktops?
On Jun 18, 4:36 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote:
http://libertarian2010.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/libertarians-say-gove...
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
