Obama didn't stop it, the Coast Guard did - to insure the safety of the barges - they didn't want another explosion and loss of life by cutting corners like bp did.
On Jun 21, 7:21 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > You are not answering the question. You are just trying to push the > question somewhere else. Meanwhile back to Zero trying to stop the > clean up so he can have a bigger crisis not to waste (thank you, Rahm, > for telling us your philosophy of government - explains the terrible job > this admin is doing). Guess you have problems answering that > truthfully so you try to hijack the subject. Typical of Dem liars. > > > > euwe wrote: > > So Libby just refused to answer because he had a sudden anxiety > > attack? - that fits the facts, doesn't it. > > > On Jun 20, 9:41 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Suppose you then find out what the FBI did with the original interview > >> of Tom Russet. They claimed they could not find it at all. Then you > >> have a member of the jury who was a former assistant to Russet and was > >> releasing notes he took so he could write a book about the trial and the > >> jury deliberations. That is patently illegal. Then you have a judge > >> that claims that the prosecution cannot bring up new things in the > >> summation and Fitz brought up a slew of things that could not be > >> answered because the defense had already spoken. The judge permitted > >> it. And to this day the man who really released the fact that Plame > >> was CIA ,Richard ARmitage of the State Dept, was left alone totally and > >> he was the one who should have been on trial. That is the truth and > >> you cannot deny it. There were so many mangled points in that trial > >> that it should have been null processed and restarted to keep within > >> legal constraints. > > >> euwe wrote: > > >>> Have your fun, but the difference between commuting a sentence and > >>> pardoning doesn't change the fact that he was sympathetic to those who > >>> were involved in the Plame affair. Your complaints are nothing but > >>> legalistic obfuscation of the truth - as was Bush. > > >>> On Jun 20, 5:37 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> FS. You lied. Out and out lied. And did it on purpose. If nobody > >>>> called you on it then it might stuck like that claims that Sarah said > >>>> she could see Russia from her back yard. Never happened. That was > >>>> Tina Fey. You are trying to do the same thing again. Liar. Big > >>>> plain old liar. > > >>>> euwe wrote: > > >>>>> I didn't lie, I "misspoke" - you know, like Cheney when he said "I > >>>>> think he has indeed, reconstituted nuclear weapons." > > >>>>> On Jun 20, 5:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> so he did not pardon him. You lied again as usual. > > >>>>>> euwe wrote: > > >>>>>>> right you are - he was just spared prison time for obstruction of > >>>>>>> justice. > > >>>>>>> My decision to commute his prison sentence leaves in place a harsh > >>>>>>> punishment for Mr. Libby. The reputation he gained through his years > >>>>>>> of public service and professional work in the legal community is > >>>>>>> forever damaged. His wife and young children have also suffered > >>>>>>> immensely. He will remain on probation. The significant fines imposed > >>>>>>> by the judge will remain in effect. The consequences of his felony > >>>>>>> conviction on his former life as a lawyer, public servant, and private > >>>>>>> citizen will be long-lasting. > > >>>>>>> The Constitution gives the President the power of clemency to be used > >>>>>>> when he deems it to be warranted. It is my judgment that a commutation > >>>>>>> of the prison term in Mr. Libby's case is an appropriate exercise of > >>>>>>> this power. > > >>>>>>> On Jun 20, 5:09 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> There you go again. Bush did not pardon Libby. However your boy > >>>>>>>> Bubba > >>>>>>>> pardoned all sorts of people to get support for his wife and to gain > >>>>>>>> big > >>>>>>>> bucks (remember Mark Rich?). > > >>>>>>>> euwe wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Whatever happened to "Personal Responsibility" ? > >>>>>>>>> --------- > >>>>>>>>> You mean "I forgot?" > > >>>>>>>>> or "I pardoned Libby?" > > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 20, 5:39 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> Whatever happened to "Personal Responsibility" ?? These ships were > >>>>>>>>>> not manned by tourists but by seasoned sailors who are just, if not > >>>>>>>>>> more so, concerned with the preservation of their own life as the > >>>>>>>>>> USCG. > > >>>>>>>>>> Just which professional is more correct... the seasoned sailor or > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> seasoned sailor commanded by an organization that has never had a > >>>>>>>>>> successful "private or public" enterprise ?? > > >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 4:01 pm, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> oh, I get it - you're a libertoonian. So have you got your own > >>>>>>>>>>> carpet > >>>>>>>>>>> cleaning business? Or maybe you refinish parking lot blacktops? > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 4:36 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>http://libertarian2010.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/libertarians-say-gove...- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
