Libby just refused to answer ---- he should've been imprison and then deported home to Israel
On Jun 21, 8:10 am, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > So Libby just refused to answer because he had a sudden anxiety > attack? - that fits the facts, doesn't it. > > On Jun 20, 9:41 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Suppose you then find out what the FBI did with the original interview > > of Tom Russet. They claimed they could not find it at all. Then you > > have a member of the jury who was a former assistant to Russet and was > > releasing notes he took so he could write a book about the trial and the > > jury deliberations. That is patently illegal. Then you have a judge > > that claims that the prosecution cannot bring up new things in the > > summation and Fitz brought up a slew of things that could not be > > answered because the defense had already spoken. The judge permitted > > it. And to this day the man who really released the fact that Plame > > was CIA ,Richard ARmitage of the State Dept, was left alone totally and > > he was the one who should have been on trial. That is the truth and > > you cannot deny it. There were so many mangled points in that trial > > that it should have been null processed and restarted to keep within > > legal constraints. > > > euwe wrote: > > > Have your fun, but the difference between commuting a sentence and > > > pardoning doesn't change the fact that he was sympathetic to those who > > > were involved in the Plame affair. Your complaints are nothing but > > > legalistic obfuscation of the truth - as was Bush. > > > > On Jun 20, 5:37 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> FS. You lied. Out and out lied. And did it on purpose. If nobody > > >> called you on it then it might stuck like that claims that Sarah said > > >> she could see Russia from her back yard. Never happened. That was > > >> Tina Fey. You are trying to do the same thing again. Liar. Big > > >> plain old liar. > > > >> euwe wrote: > > > >>> I didn't lie, I "misspoke" - you know, like Cheney when he said "I > > >>> think he has indeed, reconstituted nuclear weapons." > > > >>> On Jun 20, 5:21 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>> so he did not pardon him. You lied again as usual. > > > >>>> euwe wrote: > > > >>>>> right you are - he was just spared prison time for obstruction of > > >>>>> justice. > > > >>>>> My decision to commute his prison sentence leaves in place a harsh > > >>>>> punishment for Mr. Libby. The reputation he gained through his years > > >>>>> of public service and professional work in the legal community is > > >>>>> forever damaged. His wife and young children have also suffered > > >>>>> immensely. He will remain on probation. The significant fines imposed > > >>>>> by the judge will remain in effect. The consequences of his felony > > >>>>> conviction on his former life as a lawyer, public servant, and private > > >>>>> citizen will be long-lasting. > > > >>>>> The Constitution gives the President the power of clemency to be used > > >>>>> when he deems it to be warranted. It is my judgment that a commutation > > >>>>> of the prison term in Mr. Libby's case is an appropriate exercise of > > >>>>> this power. > > > >>>>> On Jun 20, 5:09 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>>>> There you go again. Bush did not pardon Libby. However your boy > > >>>>>> Bubba > > >>>>>> pardoned all sorts of people to get support for his wife and to gain > > >>>>>> big > > >>>>>> bucks (remember Mark Rich?). > > > >>>>>> euwe wrote: > > > >>>>>>> Whatever happened to "Personal Responsibility" ? > > >>>>>>> --------- > > >>>>>>> You mean "I forgot?" > > > >>>>>>> or "I pardoned Libby?" > > > >>>>>>> On Jun 20, 5:39 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> Whatever happened to "Personal Responsibility" ?? These ships were > > >>>>>>>> not manned by tourists but by seasoned sailors who are just, if not > > >>>>>>>> more so, concerned with the preservation of their own life as the > > >>>>>>>> USCG. > > > >>>>>>>> Just which professional is more correct... the seasoned sailor or > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>> seasoned sailor commanded by an organization that has never had a > > >>>>>>>> successful "private or public" enterprise ?? > > > >>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 4:01 pm, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> oh, I get it - you're a libertoonian. So have you got your own > > >>>>>>>>> carpet > > >>>>>>>>> cleaning business? Or maybe you refinish parking lot blacktops? > > > >>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 4:36 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>http://libertarian2010.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/libertarians-say-gove... -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
