Then your claim is ridiculous in the first place. As you say, it was
too far afield. You started it and now you want to stop it - guess it
must hurt to lose so badly that you can't even begin to come up with an
answer.
euwe wrote:
Euwe, you claim.......
"it's a discussion about the authority of the government through Bush,
who undercut the authority of law."
Ok, so it is. Now just which one of Bushs' Executive Abominations has
Obama reversed and or removed from practice ???
There is a speech (several) in which the skinny Kenyan promised to do
just that.
I'll wait for that list... honesty counts...
-------------
Too far afield - Bush and 9/11, Executive clemency, Obama and the
coast guard authority is already out on a rabbit trail - start a new
thread.
On Jun 21, 9:55 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
Euwe, you claim.......
"it's a discussion about the
authority of the government through Bush, who undercut the authority
of law."
Ok, so it is. Now just which one of Bushs' Executive Abominations has Obama
reversed and or removed from practice ???
There is a speech (several) in which the skinny Kenyan promised to do just
that.
I'll wait for that list... honesty counts...
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:43 AM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
This discussion of Cheney
-------
This is a discussion about authority and the respect it deserves. Bush
commuted Libby's sentence, not Cheney - it's a discussion about the
authority of the government through Bush, who undercut the authority
of law. The idea that was put forth is that the Coast Guard has no
right to pull a barge out of action when the captain can't be located,
and it does not have the proper mandated life saving and fire fighting
equipment. Life is more important than property.
On Jun 21, 9:37 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
euwe,
This discussion of Cheney is nothing more than your ongoing effort to
deflect from or obfuscate the real issue, which is that the Obama
administration has, on more than a dozen occasions, slowed or blocked
efforts to clean up the oil spill. You've proven your political agenda
is more important than containing the disaster and that you are either
foolish or naive enough to believe that the handling of the disaster
by this administration is anything short of gross negligence.
You're no better or worse than those who defended Bush in the face of
his many failings. Until the general population wakes up and stops
looking at events thru colored glasses we can forget about getting
this country back on track.
On Jun 21, 9:16 am, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
And again he did not pardon Libby
=---
he commuted his sentence - that's a form of pardon, but not a full
pardon. It is covered under the same Presidential power of executive
clemency. He merely didn't clear him of wrong doing - he "just"
removed the inconvenience of serving jail time. Bush had a stake in
Libby's obstruction of justice, and probably was forced into the
compromise by Cheney. After that, they weren't so chummy.
On Jun 20, 9:42 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
And again he did not pardon Libby so your whole point is moot. What
you are saying is that in reality you have no leg to stand on so you
are
just flailing around throwing mud but it won't stick. Typical Dem
MO.
euwe wrote:
sovereign authority and the respect due.
On Jun 20, 7:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]>
wrote:
Just what does that have to do with the subject at hand.
or "I pardoned Libby?"
On Jun 20, 5:39 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]>
wrote:
Whatever happened to "Personal Responsibility" ?? These ships
were
not manned by tourists but by seasoned sailors who are just, if
not
more so, concerned with the preservation of their own life as
the
USCG.
Just which professional is more correct... the seasoned sailor
or the
seasoned sailor commanded by an organization that has never had
a
successful "private or public" enterprise ??
On Jun 18, 4:01 pm, euwe <[email protected]> wrote:
oh, I get it - you're a libertoonian. So have you got your own
carpet
cleaning business? Or maybe you refinish parking lot blacktops?
On Jun 18, 4:36 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]>
wrote:
http://libertarian2010.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/libertarians-say-gove...text -
- Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
