please don't bow anywhere no one wants to clean the carpets after you sheeple pattie
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:28 PM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > name calling > > sad little monkey > ----------- > I bow to your superior talent. > > On Jun 21, 4:27 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > more name calling in place of thought > > > > sad little monkey > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:26 PM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Another look into the labyrinthine genius we call "Republican" > > > > > On Jun 21, 4:00 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > you could not follow an analysis deep or otherwise > > > > > > you are only capable of being dupe and repeating your masters smears > as > > > you > > > > did below > > > > > > you are worthless subhuman detritus > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM, euwe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thank you for your deep analysis of the subject matter - tea > baggers > > > > > are famous for correctly dividing the word into its constituent > parts > > > > > and rendering a judgement that is completely divorced from even the > > > > > hint of a useful conclusion. You have advanced your lock-step > agenda > > > > > by one more goose step. > > > > > > > however, I find your disrespect for the rule of law disturbing. And > > > > > always remember and never forget - life is more important than > > > > > property. > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 2:01 pm, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > your gibberish always discredits itself > > > > > > > > you are a silly barking chihuahua > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:55 PM, euwe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Here we have the hypocricy - you guys are blaming Obama for the > > > Coast > > > > > > > Guard enforcing Maritime law, saying that there is no need for > the > > > > > > > barges to obey the law, fuck the law. I bring up the same thing > - > > > > > > > where Bush used his executive clemency to excuse Libby for > > > obstruction > > > > > > > of justice - and you say - it's the law - Bush was within his > > > rights > > > > > > > to commute the sentence of a law breaker... not "fuck the law" > - > > > you > > > > > > > are the ones who are hypocritical - you only want the law > obeyed > > > when > > > > > > > it is in your best interests. > > > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 1:30 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > No, it is exactly ON POINT and that, I fear, is the problem. > You > > > rail > > > > > > > > against the Bush use of executive privilege and or orders yet > > > will > > > > > not > > > > > > > > address the coinciding use of same by your party. It is > rather > > > > > > > hypocritical. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:06 AM, euwe <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Euwe, you claim....... > > > > > > > > > "it's a discussion about the authority of the government > > > through > > > > > Bush, > > > > > > > > > who undercut the authority of law." > > > > > > > > > Ok, so it is. Now just which one of Bushs' Executive > > > Abominations > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > Obama reversed and or removed from practice ??? > > > > > > > > > There is a speech (several) in which the skinny Kenyan > promised > > > to > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > just that. > > > > > > > > > I'll wait for that list... honesty counts... > > > > > > > > > ------------- > > > > > > > > > Too far afield - Bush and 9/11, Executive clemency, Obama > and > > > the > > > > > > > > > coast guard authority is already out on a rabbit trail - > start > > > a > > > > > new > > > > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 9:55 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Euwe, you claim....... > > > > > > > > > > > > "it's a discussion about the > > > > > > > > > > authority of the government through Bush, who undercut > the > > > > > authority > > > > > > > > > > of law." > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, so it is. Now just which one of Bushs' Executive > > > Abominations > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > Obama > > > > > > > > > > reversed and or removed from practice ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a speech (several) in which the skinny Kenyan > > > promised > > > > > to do > > > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll wait for that list... honesty counts... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:43 AM, euwe < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This discussion of Cheney > > > > > > > > > > > ------- > > > > > > > > > > > This is a discussion about authority and the respect it > > > > > deserves. > > > > > > > Bush > > > > > > > > > > > commuted Libby's sentence, not Cheney - it's a > discussion > > > about > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > authority of the government through Bush, who undercut > the > > > > > > > authority > > > > > > > > > > > of law. The idea that was put forth is that the Coast > Guard > > > has > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > > right to pull a barge out of action when the captain > can't > > > be > > > > > > > located, > > > > > > > > > > > and it does not have the proper mandated life saving > and > > > fire > > > > > > > fighting > > > > > > > > > > > equipment. Life is more important than property. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 9:37 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > euwe, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This discussion of Cheney is nothing more than your > > > ongoing > > > > > > > effort to > > > > > > > > > > > > deflect from or obfuscate the real issue, which is > that > > > the > > > > > Obama > > > > > > > > > > > > administration has, on more than a dozen occasions, > > > slowed or > > > > > > > blocked > > > > > > > > > > > > efforts to clean up the oil spill. You've proven your > > > > > political > > > > > > > > > agenda > > > > > > > > > > > > is more important than containing the disaster and > that > > > you > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > either > > > > > > > > > > > > foolish or naive enough to believe that the handling > of > > > the > > > > > > > disaster > > > > > > > > > > > > by this administration is anything short of gross > > > negligence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You're no better or worse than those who defended > Bush in > > > the > > > > > > > face of > > > > > > > > > > > > his many failings. Until the general population wakes > up > > > and > > > > > > > stops > > > > > > > > > > > > looking at events thru colored glasses we can forget > > > about > > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > > > > this country back on track. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 9:16 am, euwe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And again he did not pardon Libby > > > > > > > > > > > > > =--- > > > > > > > > > > > > > he commuted his sentence - that's a form of pardon, > but > > > not > > > > > a > > > > > > > full > > > > > > > > > > > > > pardon. It is covered under the same Presidential > power > > > of > > > > > > > > > executive > > > > > > > > > > > > > clemency. He merely didn't clear him of wrong doing > - > > > he > > > > > "just" > > > > > > > > > > > > > removed the inconvenience of serving jail time. > Bush > > > had a > > > > > > > stake in > > > > > > > > > > > > > Libby's obstruction of justice, and probably was > forced > > > > > into > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > compromise by Cheney. After that, they weren't so > > > chummy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 20, 9:42 pm, dick thompson < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And again he did not pardon Libby so your whole > point > > > is > > > > > > > moot. > > > > > > > > > What > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are saying is that in reality you have no leg > to > > > > > stand on > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just flailing around throwing mud but it won't > stick. > > > > > > > Typical > > > > > > > > > Dem > > > > > > > > > > > MO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > euwe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sovereign authority and the respect due. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 20, 7:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Just what does that have to do with the > subject at > > > > > hand. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> or "I pardoned Libby?" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> On Jun 20, 5:39 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Whatever happened to "Personal > Responsibility" > > > ?? > > > > > These > > > > > > > > > ships > > > > > > > > > > > were > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> not manned by tourists but by seasoned > sailors > > > who > > > > > are > > > > > > > just, > > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> more so, concerned with the preservation of > > > their > > > > > own > > > > > > > life > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> USCG. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Just which professional is more correct... > the > > > > > seasoned > > > > > > > > > sailor > > > > > > > > > > > or the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> seasoned sailor commanded by an organization > > > that > > > > > has > > > > > > > never > > > > > > > > > had > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> successful "private or public" enterprise ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Jun 18, 4:01 pm, euwe < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> oh, I get it - you're a libertoonian. So > have > > > you > > > > > got > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > own > > > > > > > > > > > carpet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> cleaning business? Or maybe you refinish > > > parking > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > > blacktops? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On Jun 18, 4:36 pm, bruce majors < > > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > http://libertarian2010.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/libertarians-say-gove. > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google > Groups. > > > > > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > > > > > > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > > > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp:// > > >www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our > > > polls. > > > > > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle H. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > > > > > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > > > > > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp:// > www.PoliticalForum.com/ > > > > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our > polls. > > > > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle H. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > > > > > > > For options & help seehttp:// > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป > > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
